The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20230424062051/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1075547012475226?icid=int.sj-abstract.similar-articles.5
Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online February 25, 2013

Is There a Medialization of Climate Science? Results From a Survey of German Climate Scientists

Ana Ivanova, Mike S. Schäfer, Inga Schlichting, and Andreas SchmidtView all authors and affiliations
Volume 35, Issue 5
https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012475226

Abstract

The relation between science and the media has recently been termed a medialization of science. The respective literature argues that interaction of scientists with the media and journalists as well as scientists’ adaptation to media criteria has increased. This article analyzes whether German climate scientists are indeed “medialized.” The results of a survey among 1,130 scientists suggest that medialization phenomena exist in climate science but that they differ significantly among different subgroups. While media interactions are more common for high-ranking scientists, an adaptation to media criteria is more typical for scientists with less experience.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

Get Access

References

Altheide D. L., Snow R. P. (1988). Towards a theory of mediation. In Anderson J. A. (Ed.), Communication yearbook (pp. 194-223). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Anderson A. (2009). Media, politics and climate change: Towards a new research agenda. Sociology Compass, 3, 166-182.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Beck S. (2012). Between trust and tribalism: The IPCC under the “public microscope.” Nature & Culture, 7, 151-173.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Bonetta L. (2007). Scientists enter the blogosphere. Cell, 129, 443-445.
Crossref
PubMed
ISI
Google Scholar
Bonetta L. (2009). Should you be tweeting? Cell, 139, 452-453.
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
Boykoff M. T., Boykoff J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14, 125-136.
Crossref
ISI
Google Scholar
Bray D., von Storch H. (2007). Climate scientists’ perceptions of climate change science (GKSS Working Paper 2007/11). Geesthacht, Germany: GKSS-Forschungszentrum.
Google Scholar
Bray D., von Storch H. (2010). CliSci2008: A survey of the perspectives of climate scientists concerning climate science and climate change (GKSS Working Paper 2010/9). Geesthacht, Germany: GKSS-Forschungszentrum.
Google Scholar
Brossard D., Shanahan J., McComas K. (2004). Are issue cycles culturally constructed? A comparison of French and American coverage of global climate change. Mass Communication & Society, 7, 359-377.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Bucchi M. (1998). Science and the media: Alternative routes in scientific communication. New York, NY: Routledge.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Dohle M., Vowe G. (2006). Der Sport auf der “Mediatisierungstreppe”? Ein Modell zur Analyse medienbedingter Veränderungen des Sports [Sport on the “Staircase of Mediatization”? A Model to Analyze Media-Related Transformation in Sport]. Medien + Erziehung, Zeitschrift für Medienpädagogik, 50(6), 18-28.
Google Scholar
Franzen M., Weingart P., Rödder S. (2011). Exploring the impact of science communication on scientific knowledge production: An introduction. In Rödder S., Franzen M., Weingart P. (Eds.), The sciences’ media connection—Communication to the public and its repercussions. Sociology of the sciences yearbook (pp. 3-14). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Google Scholar
Goodell R. (1977). The visible scientists. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Grundmann R. (2012). The legacy of climategate: Revitalizing or undermining climate science and policy? WIREs Climate Change, 3, 281-288.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Hartmann M., Hepp A. (Eds.). (2010). Die Mediatisierung der Alltagswelt [The Mediatization of Everyday Life]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Hjarvard S. (2008). The mediatization of society. Nordicom Review, 29, 105-134.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Kaufman R. L. (1996): Comparing effects in dichotomous logistic regression: A variety of standardized coefficients. Social Science Quarterly, 77, 90-109.
ISI
Google Scholar
Kepplinger H. M. (2002). Mediatization of politics: Theory and data. Journal of Communication, 52, 972-986.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Kepplinger H. M., Zerback T. (2009). Der Einfluss der Medien auf Richter und Staatsanwälte. Art, Ausmaß und Entstehung reziproker Effekte [Media Influence on Judges and Attorneys. Type, Dimension and Origin of Reciprocal Effects]. Publizistik, 54, 216-239.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Krauss W., Schäfer M. S., von Storch H. (2012). Post-normal climate science. Nature & Culture, 7, 121-132.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Krotz F. (2009). Mediatization: A concept with which to grasp media and societal change. In Lundby K. (Ed.), Mediatization: Concept, changes, consequences (pp. 21-40). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Google Scholar
Lederbogen U., Trebbe J. (2003). Promoting science on the web: Public relations for scientific organizations—Results of a content analysis. Science Communication, 24, 333-352.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Lehmkuhl M. (2012). Journalismus und Klimaforschung: Ausschnitte einer spannungsreichen Beziehung. Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen, 25(2), 63-67.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Lewenstein B. V. (1995). From fax to facts: Communication in the cold fusion saga. Social Studies of Science, 25, 403-436.
Crossref
ISI
Google Scholar
L.I.S.A. (2011). “Geisteswissenschaftler bevorzugen Zeitungen.” Das Verhältnis zwischen Wissenschaft und Medien [“Social Scientists Prefer Newspapers.” The Relation between Science and the Media]. Interview mit Prof. Dr. Hans Peter Peters. Retrieved from http://www.lisa.gerda-henkel-stiftung.de/content.php?nav_id=1802
Google Scholar
Lundby K. (Ed.). (2009). Mediatization: Concept, changes, consequences. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Google Scholar
Marcinkowski F. (2005). Die “Medialisierbarkeit” politischer Institutionen [The Potential to “Mediatize” Political Institutions]. In Rössler P., Krotz F. (Eds.), Mythen der Mediengesellschaft—The media society and its myths (pp. 341-370). Konstanz, Germany: UVK.
Google Scholar
Marcinkowski F., Steiner A. (2009). Was heißt “Medialisierung”? Autonomiebeschränkung und Ermöglichung von Politik durch Massenmedien [What is “Medialization”? Constraints of Autonomy and Enabling of Politics through the Mass Media]. In Arnold K., Classen C., Lersch E., Kinnebrock S., Wagner H. U. (Eds.), Von der Politisierung der Medien zur Medialisierung des Politischen? Zum Verhältnis von Medien und Politik im 20. Jahrhundert [The Relation between Media and Politics in the 20th Century]. Leipzig, Germany: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.
Google Scholar
Marr M., Marcinkowski F. (2006). Prominenz als Bedrohung. Zur Medialisierung des Spitzensports [The Threat of Being Prominent. On the Medialization of Elite Sports.]. Medien + Erziehung, Zeitschrift für Medienpädagogik, 50(6), 63-72.
Google Scholar
Merton R. K. (1985). Die normative Struktur der Wissenschaft [The Normative Structure of Science]. In Merton R. K. (Ed.), Entwicklung und Wandel von Forschungsinteressen [Origin and Transformation of Research Areas] (pp. 86-99). Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
Google Scholar
Meyen M. (2009). Medialisierung [Medialization]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 57, 23-38.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Neidhardt F. (2002). Wissenschaft als öffentliche Angelegenheit [Science as a Public Cause]. Berlin, Germany: Wissenschaftszentrum für Sozialforschung.
Google Scholar
Nelkin D. (1994). Promotional metaphors and their popular appeal. Public Understanding of Science, 3, 25-31.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Nentwich M. (2003). Cyberscience: Research in the age of the Internet. Vienna, Austria: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.
Google Scholar
Pajares F., Prestin A., Chen J., Nabi R. L. (2009). Social cognitive theory and media effects. In Nabi R. L., Oliver M. B. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 283-297). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Peters H. P. (Ed.). (2009). Medienorientierung biomedizinischer Forscher im internationalen Vergleich. Die Schnittstelle von Wissenschaft und Journalismus und ihre politische Relevanz [Media-Orientation of Biomedical Research: an International Comparison. The Intersection of Science and Journalism and its Political Impact]. Jülich, Germany: Forschungszentrum Jülich.
Google Scholar
Peters H. P., Brossard D., de Cheveigné S., Dunwoody S., Kallfass M., Miller S., Tsuchida S. (2008). Science-media interface. Science Communication, 30, 266-276.
Crossref
ISI
Google Scholar
Peters H. P., Heinrichs H., Jung A., Kallfass M., Petersen I. (2008). Medialization of science as a prerequisite of its legitimization and political relevance. In Cheng D., Claessens M., Gascoigne T., Metcalfe J., Schiele B., Shunke S. (Eds.), Communicating science in social contexts: New models, new practices (pp. 71-92). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Post S. (2009). Klimakatastrophe oder Katastrophenklima? Die Berichterstattung über den Klimawandel aus Sicht der Klimaforscher [Climate Catastrophe or Catastrophal Climate? Climate Change Coverage from a Scientist Perspective]. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
Google Scholar
Rödder S. (2009). Reassessing the concept of medialization of science: A story from the “book of life.” Public Understanding of Science, 18, 452-463.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Rödder S., Schäfer M. S. (2010). Repercussion and resistance: An empirical study in the interrelation between science and mass media. Communications, 35, 249-267.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Rödder S., Weingart P., Franzen M. (Eds.). (2011). The sciences’ media connection—Communication to the public and its repercussions. Sociology of the sciences yearbook. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Google Scholar
Rossmann C. (2011). Theory of reasoned action: Theory of planned behavior. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
Google Scholar
Schäfer M. S. (2007). Wissenschaft in den Medien. Die Medialisierung naturwissenschaftlicher Themen [Science in the Media. The Medialization of Scientific Subjects]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Google Scholar
Schäfer M. S. (2009). From public understanding to public engagement: An empirical assessment of changes in science coverage. Science Communication, 30, 475-505.
Crossref
ISI
Google Scholar
Schäfer M. S. (2012). Online communication about climate change and climate politics: A literature review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3, 527-543.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Schäfer M. S., Ivanova A., Schmidt A. (2011). Globaler Klimawandel, globale Öffentlichkeit? Medienaufmerksamkeit für den Klimawandel in 23 Ländern [Global Climate Change, Global Public Sphere? Climate Change Coverage in 23 Countries]. Studies in Communication/Media, 1, 131-148.
Google Scholar
Schäfer M. S., Ivanova A., Schmidt A. (2012). Issue-Attention: Mediale Aufmerksamkeit für den Klimawandel in 26 Ländern [Issue-Attention: Climate Change Coverage in 26 Countries]. In Neverla I., Schäfer M. S. (Eds.), Das Medien-Klima [The Media Climate] (pp. 149-174). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Schulz W. (2004). Reconstructing mediatization as an analytical concept. European Journal of Communication, 19, 87-101.
Crossref
ISI
Google Scholar
Schützenmeister F., Bußmann M. (2009). Online-Befragungen in der Wissenschaftsforschung [Online-Surveys in Science Research]. In Jackob N., Schoen H., Zerback T. (Eds.), Sozialforschung im Internet. Methodologie und Praxis der Online-Befragung [Social Sciences Online. Methodology and Implementation of Online-Surveys ] (pp. 245-260). Wiesbaden, Germany: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Schwägerl C. (2009). “Die Industrieländer stecken tief in der CO2-Insolvenz.” Interview mit Hans Joachim Schellnhuber [“The Industrialized Countries are Mired in a CO2-Bankruptcy.” Interview with Hans Joachim Schellnhuber]. Retrieved from http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/natur/0,1518,646049,00.html
Google Scholar
Shinn T., Whitley R. (1985). Expository science: Forms and functions of popularisation. Yearbook in the sociology of the sciences. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Speck D. L. (2010). A hot topic? Climate change mitigation policies, politics, and the media in Australia. Research in Human Ecology, 17, 125-134.
Google Scholar
Stichweh R. (1988). Differenzierung des Wissenschaftssystems [Differentiation of the Science System]. In Mayntz R., Rosewitz B., Schimank U., Stichweh R. (Eds.), Differenzierung und Verselbständigung [Differentiation and Spin-Off]. Zur Entwicklung gesellschaftlicher Teilsysteme [The Transformation of Social Sub-Systems] (pp. 45-115). Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlag.
Google Scholar
Stichweh R. (1994a). Professionen und Disziplinen: Formen der Differenzierung zweier Systeme beruflichen Handelns in modernen Gesellschaften [Professions and Disciplines: Types of Differentiation between Two Systems of Professional Action in Modern Societies]. In Stichweh R. (Ed.), Wissenschaft, Universität, Professionen. Soziologische Analysen [Science, University, Professions. Sociological Analyses] (pp. 278-336). Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
Google Scholar
Stichweh R. (1994b). Wissenschaft. Universität. Profession [Science. University. Professions]. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
Google Scholar
Thompson J. B. (1995). The media and modernity. Cambridge, England: Polity.
Google Scholar
Tsfati Y., Cohen J., Gunther A. C. (2011). The influence of presumed media influence on news about science and scientists. Science Communication, 33, 143-166.
Crossref
ISI
Google Scholar
Valiverronen E. (2001). From mediation to mediatization: The new politics of communicating science and biotechnology. In Kivikuru U., Savolainen J. (Eds.), The politics of public issues (pp. 157-177). Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki, Department of Communication.
Google Scholar
Vowe G. (2006). Mediatisierung der Politik? Ein theoretischer Ansatz auf dem Prüfstand [Mediatization of Politics? A Theoretical Approach on Trial]. Publizistik, 51, 437-455.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Waldrop M. M. (2008). Science 2.0. Scientific American, 298, 68-73.
Crossref
PubMed
ISI
Google Scholar
Weingart P. (2001). Die Stunde der Wahrheit? Zum Verhältnis der Wissenschaft zu Politik, Wirtschaft und Medien in der Wissensgesellschaft [A Moment of Truth? The question of Science’s relation to Politics, Economy and Media in a Knowledge Society]. Weilerswist, Germany: Velbrück.
Google Scholar
Weingart P. (2002). The moment of truth for science: The consequences of the “knowledge society” for society and science. EMBO Reports, 3, 703-706.
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
Weingart P. (2005a). Die Wissenschaft der Öffentlichkeit und die Öffentlichkeit der Wissenschaft [The Science of Public Spheres and the Publicity of Science]. In Weingart P. (Ed.), Die Wissenschaft der Öffentlichkeit. Essays zum Verhältnis von Wissenschaft, Medien und Öffentlichkeit [The Science of Public Spheres. Essays on the Relation of Science, the Media and the Public Sphere] (pp. 9-33). Weilerswist, Germany: Velbrück.
Google Scholar
Weingart P. (2005b). Die Wissenschaft der Öffentlichkeit. Essays zum Verhältnis von Wissenschaft, Medien und Öffentlichkeit [The Science of Public Spheres. Essays on the Relation of Science, the Media and the Public Sphere]. Weilerswist, Germany: Velbrück.
Google Scholar
Weingart P. (2011). The lure of the mass media and its repercussions on science. In Rödder S., Franzen M., Weingart P. (Eds.), The sciences’ media connection—Communication to the public and its repercussions. Sociology of the sciences yearbook (pp. 17-32). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Google Scholar
Weingart P., Engels A., Pansegrau P. (2000). Risks of communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 261-283.
Crossref
ISI
Google Scholar
Yoon Y. (2005). Examining journalists’ perceptions and news coverage of stem cell and cloning organizations. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82, 281-300.
Crossref
ISI
Google Scholar

Biographies

Ana Ivanova, MA, is a research associate in the research group “Media Constructions of Climate Change” at the University of Hamburg, “KlimaCampus.” She is currently conducting her PhD study on International Comparisons of Climate Change Coverage in the Mass Media.
Mike S. Schäfer is an assistant professor at the University of Hamburg’s Department of Journalism and Communications. He also heads the research group “Media Constructions of Climate Change” at Hamburg’s “KlimaCampus.”
Inga Schlichting, MA, is a research associate in the research group “Media Constructions of Climate Change” at the University of Hamburg, “KlimaCampus.” She is currently conducting her PhD study on the Credibility of Corporate Communication on Climate Change.
Andreas Schmidt, MA, is a research associate in the research group “Media Constructions of Climate Change” at the University of Hamburg, “KlimaCampus.” He is currently conducting his PhD study on Climate Justice Constructions in the Media.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the SAGE Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Volume 35, Issue 5
Pages: 626 - 653
Article first published online: February 25, 2013
Issue published: October 2013

Keywords

  1. medialization
  2. science communication
  3. climate change
  4. survey
  5. Germany

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2013.
Request permissions for this article.

History

Published online: February 25, 2013
Issue published: October 2013

Authors

Affiliations

Ana Ivanova
University of Hamburg, Germany
View all articles by this author
Mike S. Schäfer
University of Hamburg, Germany
View all articles by this author
Inga Schlichting
University of Hamburg, Germany
View all articles by this author
Andreas Schmidt
University of Hamburg, Germany
View all articles by this author

Notes

Ana Ivanova, KlimaCampus, University of Hamburg, Grindelberg 5, 20144 Hamburg, Germany. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Science Communication.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 1288

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016

Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores


Articles citing this one

Web of Science: 22 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 22

  1. Geoscientists' views about science communication: predicting willingne...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Mapping mental models of science communication: How academics in Germa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  3. Marine ecosystem science and the media: Exploring ways to improve news...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Representation of climate change consequences in British newspapers
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Beyond the ivory tower: Measuring and explaining academic engagement w...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Climate Feedback: Wissenschaft kommentiert Journalismus und entwickelt...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Does newspapers coverage influence the citations count of scientific p...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Toward narrowing the gap between science communication and science edu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Scientific networks on Twitter: Analyzing scientists’ interactions in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  10. Public communication by climate scientists: what, with whom and why?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Do newspapers preferentially cover biomedical studies involving nation...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  12. Adaptation in Mountain Agriculture: Food Security in the Hindu-Kush Hi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Partizipative Hochschulkommunikation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Strategische Kommunikation von Hochschulen in Governance-Prozessen
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Politicized Science Communication: Predicting Scientists’ Acceptance o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Scientists’ views about communication objectives
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  17. Defining criteria for good environmental journalism and testing their ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  18. Mapping Neuroscientists’ Perceptions of the Nature and Effects of Publ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Rhetorical Strategies for Scientific Authority: A Boundary-Work Analys...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Scientists, the Media, and the Public Communication of Science
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Medialization of Research Policy...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Between Consensus and Denial...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Subscribe to this journal

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

Start 2 week free trial
Need help?

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text
View full textDownload PDF

Also from SAGE Publishing