Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'd recommend looking at the square-cube law. Any giant with humanoid proportions but ten times the size of an ordinary person could never survive. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 4, 2019 at 19:42
  • $\begingroup$ @Gryphon That's something I've been concerned about, yes. My preference would be for the giant to be not overly much bigger than a human, maybe twice the stature at most. But I don't know what that does to the radius of the finger and whether my ring scenario would work. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 4, 2019 at 19:47
  • $\begingroup$ Your pretty much correct in your original question. The giant would have to be 10 times bigger. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 4, 2019 at 19:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ if you want to question to specifically adress "reality check", add that to the tags, otherwise everything is fair game (though I did the reality check anyway) $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 4, 2019 at 21:45
  • $\begingroup$ @Trish I wasn't sure whether that tag applied to this scenario or not, but I suppose it does really. I've added it as you suggest. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 4, 2019 at 21:56