Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Fifty hydrogen bombs will absolutely not sterilize a planet. That wouldn't even be enough to drive humanity extinct. Best it could do is set us back 5,000 years. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 13, 2022 at 20:24
  • $\begingroup$ @EthanManess Agreed. Robert should say "5 billion hydrogen bombs, each terratonne". After all, that isn't much harder. I think that would even boil the oceans. Earth's oceans take 10^27 J to boil (roughly). A KT is 4*10^12 J; need 10^15 KT of nukes to boil a planet's oceans. (TT is 10^9 KT, a billion of them is 10^18 KT, so a 100x safety factor). We could already build TT nukes; making a TT nuke factory in their system seems plausible. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 13, 2022 at 20:55
  • $\begingroup$ I was thinking of destroying mankind. You couldn't kill the microbes found five miles underground, even with billions of hydrogen bombs, but I doubt that the aliens would find them a threat. My solution would wipe out the entire chain that starts with photosynthetic plants, but mushrooms would probably survive. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 13, 2022 at 22:26