Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

4
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @StephanKolassa no I don't - that's the beauty of the second part (I've tried to make it a little clearer) - the right to collect taxes is auctioned off, the government takes the amount bid, and the collector gets to keep however much he gathers beyond that (or bears the loss if he doesn't). All that's required of him here is to report the census count afterwards. He keeps the excess by design, so no motive to underreport. $\endgroup$ Commented 14 hours ago
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @StephanKolassa you still want some kind of ballpark external control, but it's a lot quicker and easier for a government inspector to check - "yep, looks like there are about 200 people in this village" when villagers have no incentive to hide from him, then to try and count each person individually. This is still less precise than the answers above, but it's also building a tax system to solve the problem, rather than building the entire society around the problem, which is IMO better. $\endgroup$ Commented 14 hours ago
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What have the romans ever done for sus? $\endgroup$ Commented 10 hours ago
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Pica - The Aquaduct? $\endgroup$ Commented 5 hours ago