Timeline for answer to Given an "indestructible" material used for armor - what are ways to explain that material not being used as a weapon as well? by James
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jan 10, 2016 at 16:01 | history | suggested | Marcus Bitzl | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected sentence.
|
| Jan 10, 2016 at 14:02 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 10, 2016 at 16:01 | |||||
| Jan 10, 2016 at 13:44 | comment | added | leftaroundabout | Electricity works unless the armor is a very good insulator or a very good conductor – i.e. Faraday cage, which actually protects you better against EM (also shields microwaves) than dielectric armor. | |
| Jan 9, 2016 at 21:50 | comment | added | David K | A computer subjected to a large enough shock will break. Attacks meant to damage whatever's inside the armor will still work as before when you replace humans with robots; you just need to shake them up harder to break them. | |
| Jan 9, 2016 at 7:43 | comment | added | Freedo | What about remote controlled or fully automated tanks, helicopter etc? You would need to damage the amor and not just kill the humans inside. This would probably only speed up the development of A.I | |
| Jan 8, 2016 at 20:54 | history | answered | James | CC BY-SA 3.0 |