Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

9
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why is this being downvoted? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 6, 2016 at 2:53
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ I didn't downvote this but the answer seems pretty enigmatic to me. What does it mean destroys it? Does the interceptor#1 explode in proximity to nuke#1 or maybe it just rams it? Where does the ionization comes from? What is Ionized, air or some other material that got out during collision? Why wouldn't we see both nuke#1 and nuke#2 and intercept them at the same time? In my opinion the answer as it is now needs improvement. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 6, 2016 at 8:52
  • 11
    $\begingroup$ I believe I understand what this answer is suggesting: that: (a) you can successfully prevent the first inbound nuke from getting through, but (b) the air explosion from your own interceptor nuke would create a lot of ionizing radiation and charged particles in the air that would result in a rather large radar blind spot, greatly hindering your targeting efforts to shoot down further inbound nukes. At least, I think that's what Loren is saying. Loren, your answer would probably be better if you fleshed it out a bit more, adding more explanation. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 6, 2016 at 9:27
  • $\begingroup$ @wingleader This answer does not currently have any downvotes. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 6, 2016 at 11:14
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I think Loren's post is pretty clear. The enemy uses a tactic that renders defensive radars ineffective and drops the 2nd warhead right down the pipe. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 7, 2016 at 0:38