Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

6
  • $\begingroup$ While venting matter at a missile of antimatter would destroy it, this question is asking about beams moving at near light speed, so venting likely is not an option $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 12, 2016 at 3:00
  • $\begingroup$ You have to first detect the beam before you can launch trash at it. But you detect it when it punches a hole in the ship. The beam is a light-speed weapon. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 12, 2016 at 5:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @TonyEnnis> it's not light-speed. Or it's not anti-matter. Your pick. Granted, it's still fast enough that throwing anything heavier than particles seems unreasonable. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 12, 2016 at 7:04
  • $\begingroup$ This is virtually the same as my answer. You might want to flesh out the part about Whipple shields. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 12, 2016 at 18:48
  • $\begingroup$ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whipple_shield whipple sheilds are layered ablative armor, they work because the more energetic the explosion the more debris, (in this case antimatter) is thrown away from the target. better yet a whipple shield could be fairly easily charged to increase deflection. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 13, 2016 at 21:09