Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Key Takeaways
Introduction
Conclusions
References
FAQs
All Topics
Anthropology
Archaeology

Austronesian Migrations and Developments in Micronesia

Profile image of Mike CarsonMike Carson

2013

Last updated
visibility

…

description

28 pages

Abstract

When considering prehistoric Austronesian settlement of Remote Oceania, the region of Micronesia has posed some difficult problems. According to historical and ethnographic knowledge, the people of Micronesia sustained multiple long-distance contacts. In these perspectives, ancient cultural origins are complicated and unclear, and the separate cultural groups appear tightly inter-connected. According to archaeological evidence and historical linguistic studies, however, the different groups of Micronesia have distinctive cultural histories. Across these hundreds of very small islands, at least five different colonizing migration episodes can be discerned, beginning 3500 years ago and continuing into the last 1000 years. These earliest migration routes later were over-written by newer traditions of longdistance inter-island contacts and networks. This summary of Micronesian archaeology clarifies the chronology of Austronesian migrations and developments. The results resolve some of the complications and frustrations of Micronesian culture history within a larger Asia-Pacific perspective.

Key takeaways
sparkles

AI

  1. At least five distinct colonizing migrations into Micronesia occurred over the last 3500 years.
  2. Austronesian settlement in the Mariana Islands began 3500 years ago, marking Remote Oceania's first human occupation.
  3. Cultural histories in Micronesia show significant diversity despite shared Austronesian origins.
  4. The Philippines served as a crucial source for both Mariana and Palau settlements, indicating complex migration patterns.
  5. Population growth in Micronesia accelerated about 1000 years ago, leading to intensified cultural exchange and settlement.

Related papers

Review of The Prehistory of Polynesia, by Jesse D Jennings, ed
Alan Howard

1982

View PDFchevron_right
Traditional Micronesian Societies
Glenn Petersen

2009

View PDFchevron_right
Dispersal, Isolation, and Interaction in the Islands of Polynesia: A Critical Review of Archaeological and Genetic Evidence
Mark D McCoy, K. Ann Horsburgh

Integration of archaeology, modern genetics, and ancient DNA holds promise for the reconstruction of the human past. We examine the advances in research on the indigenous peoples of Polynesia to determine: (1) what do archaeological and genetic data (ancient and modern DNA) tell us about the origins of Polynesians; and, (2) what evidence is there for long-distance travel and contacts between Polynesians and indigenous populations of the Americas? We note that the general dispersal pattern of founding human populations in the remote islands of the Pacific and long-distance interaction spheres continue to reflect well-established models. New research suggests that the formation of an Ancestral Polynesia Culture in Western Polynesia may have involved differential patterns of dispersal followed by significant later migrations. It has also been suggested that the pause between the settlement of Western and Eastern Polynesia was centuries longer than currently thought, followed by a remarkably rapid pulse of island colonization. Long-distance travel between islands of the Pacific is currently best documented through the sourcing of artifacts, while the discovery of admixture of Native American DNA within the genome of the people from Easter Island (Rapa Nui) is strong new evidence for sustained contacts between Polynesia and the Americas.

View PDFchevron_right
The Austronesians, the Nusantao and the Lapita Cultural Complex: A Review of Neolithic migration in SEA and Oceania
Raphael B Reyes

Peter Bellwood’s Out-of-Taiwan hypothesis is generally more dominant and accepted model of the Neolithic Austronesian migration. The dispersal and expansion of this population from southern China to Oceania from 6000 BP to 750 BP due to population pressures from an agricultural economy is the general idea for this model. The Nusantao Maritime Trading and Communication Network (NMTCN) concept by Wilhelm Solheim II proposes the general origin area of the Austronesian speakers in the Neolithic in the southern Philippine-eastern Indonesia area where it spread multi-directionally and up to the north to southern China. Both models specifically consult the Lapita Cultural Complex and agree that it was Austronesian speakers who were responsible for it but their associated pottery complex is widely different, and refuted by the other. For Bellwood, this is the Dabenkeng/Tapenkeng culture in Taiwan, for Solheim it is the Sa-hyunh-Kalanay complex of Viet Nam which is tied to the Lapita. In summary, what we have here are two traditions of archaeology producing different perspectives on the Neolithic Austronesian migration, providing insight as well on theory formulation as well as the reflexive implications on archaeology as a whole.

View PDFchevron_right
Proto-Micronesian Kin Terms, Descent Groups, and Interisland Voyaging
Jeffrey Charles Marck

Oceanic Linguistics, 2002

The historical method of comparative linguistics is used to reconstruct Proto-Micronesian kin terms. Linguistic evidence suggests that Proto-Micronesian society was matrilineal rather than bilateral as Murdock proposed in an early typological reconstruction of Micronesian society. The weakening or disappearance of matrilineal institutions in Micronesia is associated with the demise of regular long-distance voyaging.

View PDFchevron_right
Overview of Polynesian Archaeology and Prehistory
Patrick Kirch

The pace of archaeological research in Polynesia has intensified in recent years, resulting in more than 500 new literature citations over the past decade. Fieldwork has continued in such previously well-studied archipelagoes as Tonga and Samoa in Western Polynesia, and Hawai'i and New Zealand in Eastern Polynesia, and has expanded into previously neglected islands including Niue, the Equatorial Islands, the Austral Islands, and Mangareva. The emergence of Ancestral Polynesian culture out of its Eastern Lapita predecessor is increasingly well understood, and the chronology of Polynesian dispersal and expansion into Eastern Polynesia has engaged several researchers. Aside from these fundamental issues of origins and chronology, major research themes over the past decade include (1) defining the nature, extent, and timing of long-distance interaction spheres, particularly in Eastern Polynesia; (2) the impacts of human colonization and settlement on island ecosystems; (3) variation in Polynesian economic systems and their transformations over time; and (4) sociopolitical change, especially as viewed through the lens of household or microscale archaeology. Also noteworthy is the rapidly evolving nature of interactions between archaeologists and native communities, a critical aspect of archaeological practice in the region.

View PDFchevron_right
Indo-Pacific Migration and Colonization—Introduction
Sue O'Connor

Asian Perspectives, 2008

View PDFchevron_right
The Many Sides of Polynesian Archaeology in Reference to the Colonization Process in Southeast Polynesia
Marshall Weisler

2008

P olynesian archaeology is undergoing a renaissance with spirited debates on a number of fundamental issues such as dating human colonization of islands and archipelagoes, determining the causes of landscape change (whether human-induced, climate affected, or some manner of both), defining the temporal and geographical limits oflong-distance interaction spheres, the causes and consequences of sociopolitical change, and the nature of Ancestral Polynesian Culture. None of these topics engender a discipline-wide consensus, least of which is the date for the colonization of any Polynesian archipelago. A recent review of Polynesian archaeology (Kirch & Kahn 2007) cataloged more than 500 citations since a similar inventory a decade earlier (Kirch & Weisler 1994) with opinions weighing up on both sides of each of these and other issues. In a 2007 article entitled "Credit Where Credit is Due: The History of the Chumash Oceangoing Plank Canoe" in American Antiquity (72: 196209), Je...

View PDFchevron_right
Human Colonization of the Palau Islands, Western Micronesia
Duncan Wright
View PDFchevron_right
The Archaeology of Western Micronesia
Scott Fitzpatrick

The Oxford Handbook of Prehistoric Oceania, 2018

Western Micronesia encompasses several major archipelagos and islands, including the Marianas, Yap, and Palau. Language and human biology suggest Western Micronesia was most likely colonized from Island Southeast Asia in a complex process, possibly involving multiple population movements from different areas during prehistory. A key archaeological question concerns the variable timing of this colonization, which could be as early as 4,500 years ago according to paleoenvironmental data or up to 1,000 years later when considering artifact-associated dates. Although sometimes perceived as similar, Micronesia’s western archipelagos comprise varying cultural sequences with, for example, the region’s earliest pottery, Achugao Incised and San Roque Incised, and megalithic stone structures, or Latte, in the Marianas, complexly constructed earthworks covering much of the main islands of Palau, and extensive prehistoric and historic exchange systems, such as the sawei, centered on Yap.

View PDFchevron_right

References (80)

  1. Alkire, William H. 1965 Lamotrek Atoll Inter-island Socioeconomic Ties. Illinois Studies in Anthropology 5. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  2. 1970 Systems of Measurement on Woleai Atoll, Caroline Islands. Anthropos 65:1- 73.
  3. Ardika, I. Wayan, and Peter Bellwood 1991 Sembiran: The Beginnings of Indian Contact with Bali. Antiquity 65:221-232.
  4. Athens, J. Stephen 1983 The Megalithic Ruins of Nan Madol. Natural History 92:50-61. 1990a Nan Madol Pottery, Pohnpei. In R.L. Hunter-Anderson (Ed.), Recent Advances in Micronesian Archaeology, R. L. Hunter-Anderson, ed. Pp. 17-32. Micronesica Supplement 2. Mangilao: University of Guam.
  5. 1990b Kosrae Pottery, Clay and Early Settlement." In Recent Advances in Micronesian Archaeology, R. L. Hunter-Anderson, ed. Pp. 171-186. Micronesica Supplement 2. Mangilao: University of Guam.
  6. Athens J. Stephen, Michael F. Dega, and Jerome V. Ward 2004 Austronesian Colonization of the Mariana Islands: The Palaeoenvironmental Evidence. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 24:21-30.
  7. Ayres, William S. 1990 Pohnpei's Position in Eastern Micronesian Prehistory. Recent Advances in Micronesian Archaeology, R. L. Hunter-Anderson, ed. Pp. 187-212. Micronesica Supplement 2. Mangilao: University of Guam.
  8. 1992 Nan Madol, Micronesia. Society for American Archaeology Bulletin 10:4-5.
  9. Ayres, William S., and Alan E. Haun 1990 Prehistoric Food Production in Eastern Micronesia. In Pacific Production Systems: Approaches to Economic Prehistory, D. Yen and M. J. M. Mummery, eds. Pp. 211-230. Occasional Papers in Prehistory 18. Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies, the Australian National University.
  10. Bedford, Stuart, Matthew Spriggs, and Ralph Regenvanu 2006 The Teouma Lapita Site and the Early Human Settlement of the Pacific Islands. Antiquity 80:812-828.
  11. Bellwood, Peter S. 1991 The Austronesian Dispersal and the Origin of Languages. American Scientist 265:88-93.
  12. 1997 Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian Archipelago. Revised Edition. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
  13. 2007 Southeast China and the prehistory of the Austronesians. In Lost Maritime Cultures: China and the Pacific, T. L. Jiao, ed. Pp. 36-53. Honolulu: Bishop Museum Press.
  14. Bellwood, Peter, James J. Fox, and Darrell Tryon, eds. 1995 The Austronesians: Historical and Comparative Perspectives. Canberra: Research school of Pacific and Asian Studies, the Australian National University.
  15. Bellwood, Peter, Geoffrey Chambers, Malcolm Ross, and Hsiao-chun Hung 2011 Are "Cultures" Inherited? Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Origins and Migrations of Austronesian-speaking Peoples prior to 1000 BC. In Investigating Archaeological Cultures: Material Culture, Variability, and Transmission, B. W. Roberts and M. vander Linden, eds. Pp. 321-354. New York: Springer Science and Business Media.
  16. Bender, Byron W., Ward H. Goodenough, Frederick H. Jackson, Jeffrey Marck, Kenneth L. Rehg, Ho-min Sohn, Stepehen Trussel, and Judith W. Wang 2003a Proto-Micronesian Reconstructions -1. Oceanic Linguistics 42:1-110. 2003b Proto-Micronesian Reconstructions -2. Oceanic Linguistics 42:271-358.
  17. Blust, Robert 1984 Malaita-Micronesian: An Eastern Oceanic Subgroup? Journal of the Polynesian Society 93:99-140.
  18. 2000 Chamorro Historical Phonology. Oceanic Linguistics 39:3-122. 2009 The Austronesian Languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, the Australian National University.
  19. Butler, Brian M. 1994 Early Prehistoric Settlement in the Mariana Islands: New Evidence from Saipan. Man and Culture in Oceania 10:15-38.
  20. Carson, Mike T. 1998 Cultural Affinities of Monumental Architecture in the Phoenix Islands. Journal of the Polynesian Society 107:61-77.
  21. 2008 Refining Earliest Settlement in Remote Oceania: Renewed Archaeological Investigations at Unai Bapot, Saipan. Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 3: 115-139.
  22. 2011 Palaeohabitat of First Settlement Sites 1500-1000 B.C. in Guam, Mariana Islands, Western Pacific. Journal of Archaeological Science 38:2207-2221.
  23. 2012a Evolution of an Austronesian Landscape: The Ritidian Site in Guam. Journal of Austronesian Studies 3:55-86.
  24. 2012b An Overview of Latte Period Archaeology. Micronesica 42:1-79. 2012c Recent Developments in Prehistory: Perspectives on Settlement Chronology, Inter-community Relations, and Identity Formation. In Polynesian Outliers: The State of the Art, R. Feinberg and R. Scaglion, eds. Pp. 27-48. Ethnology Monographs 21. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh. 2013 Micronesia: Archaeology. In Encyclopedia of Human Migration, Volume 1: Prehistory, I. Ness and P. Bellwood, eds. Pp. in February 2013. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
  25. Carson, Mike T., Hsiao-chun Hung, Glenn Summerhayes, and Peter Bellwood 2013 The Pottery Trail from Southeast Asia to the Pacific. Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 8: pages in April 2013.
  26. Carson, Mike T., and Hiro Kurashina 2012 Re-envisioning Long-distance Remote Oceanic Migration: Early Dates in the Mariana Islands. World Archaeology 44:409-435.
  27. Cordy, Ross 1982 Lelu, the Stone City of Kosrae: 1978-1981 research. Journal of the Polynesian Society 86:103-119.
  28. 1985 Investigations of Leluh's Stone Ruins. National Geographic Research 1: 255- 263. 1986 Archaeological Settlement Patterns Studies on Yap. Micronesian Archaeological Survey Report 16. Saipan: Historic Preservation Office, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. 1993 The Lelu Stone Ruins (Kosrae, Micronesia): 1978-1981 Historical and Archaeological Research. Asian and Pacific Archaeology Series 10. Honolulu: Social Science Research Institute, University of Hawaii.
  29. Craib, John L. 1981 Settlement in Ulithi Atoll, Western Caroline Islands. Asian Perspectives 24:47-55.
  30. Micronesian Prehistory: An Archaeological Overview. Science 219:922-927. 1999 Colonisation of the Mariana Islands: New Evidence and Implications for Human Movements in the Western Pacific. In The Pacific from 5000 to 20,000 BP: Colonisation and Transformation, J. C. Galipaud and I. Lilley, eds. Pp. 477-485. Paris: Editions de l'ORSTOM.
  31. Davidson, Janet M. 1988 Archaeology in Micronesia since 1965: Past Achievements and Future Prospects. New Zealand Journal of Archaeology 10:83-100.
  32. 1992 New Evidence about the Date of Colonisation of Nukuoro Atoll, a Polynesian Outlier in the Eastern Caroline Islands. Journal of the Polynesian Society 101:293-298.
  33. Descantes, Christophe 2005 Integrating Archaeology and Ethnohistory: The Development of Exchange between Yap and Ulithi, Western Caroline Islands. BAR International Series 1344. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.
  34. Descantes, Christophe, Hector Neff, and Michael D. Glascock 2002 Yapese Prestige Goods: The INAA Evidence for an Asian Dragon Jar. In Geochemical Evidence for Long-distance Exchange, M. D. Glascock, ed., Pp. 229-256. Westport, Connecticut: Bergin and Garvey.
  35. Dickinson, William R. 2003 Impact of Mid-Holocene Hydro-isostatic Highstand in Regional Sea Level on Habitability of Islands in Pacific Oceania. Journal of Coastal Research 19:489-502.
  36. Dickinson, William R., and J. Stephen Athens 2007 Holocene Paleoshorelines and Paleoenvironmental History of Palau: Implications for Human Settlement. Journal of Island and coastal Archaeology 2:175-196.
  37. Fitzpatrick, Scott M. 2002a AMS Dating of Human Bone from Palau: New Evidence for a Pre-2000 B.P. Settlement. Radiocarbon 44:217-221.
  38. A Radiocarbon Chronology of Yapese Stone Money Quarries in Palau. Micronesica 34:227-242.
  39. 2003 Early Human Burials in the Western Pacific: Evidence for a c. 3000-year-old Occupation on Palau. Antiquity 77:719-731.
  40. 2008 Maritime Interregional Interaction in Micronesia: Deciphering Multi-group Contacts and Exchange Systems through Time. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 27:131-147.
  41. Fitzpatrick, Scott M., and Greg C. Nelson 2011 Purposeful Commingling of Adult and child Cranial Elements from the Chelechol ra Orrak Cemetery, Palau. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 21:360-366.
  42. Galipaud, Jean-Christophe 2001
  43. Le Peuplement Initial de Pohnpei. Journal de la Société des Océanistes 112:49-60.
  44. Hung, Hsiao-chun 2008 Migration and Cultural Interaction in Southern Coastal China, Taiwan and the Northern Philippines, 3000 BC to AD 100: The Early History of the Austronesian-Speaking Populations. Doctoral dissertation. Canberra: the Australian National University.
  45. Hung, Hsiao-chun, Mike T. Carson, and Peter Bellwood 2012 Earliest Settlement in the Marianas: A Response. Antiquity 86:910-914.
  46. Hung, Hsiao-chun, Mike T. Carson, Peter Bellwood, Frediliza Campos, Philip J. Piper, Eusebio Dizon, Mary Jane Louise A. Bolunia, Marc Oxenham, and Chi Zhang 2011 The First Settlement of Remote Oceania: The Philippines to the Marianas. Antiquity 85:909-926.
  47. Hung, Hsiao-chun, Nguyen Kim Dung, Peter Bellwood, and Mike T. Carson In press Coastal Connectivity: Long-term Trading Networks across the South China Sea. Journal of Island and Costal Archaeology.
  48. Hunter-Anderson, Rosalind L. 1985 Settlement Patterns in Nlul Village, Map Island, Yap, Western Caroline Islands. Micronesian Archaeological Survey Report 20. Saipan: Historic Preservation Office, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
  49. Hunter-Anderson, Rosalind L., and Ygal Zan 1996 Demystifying the Sawei, a Traditional Interisland Exchange System. Isla: A Journal of Micronesian Studies 4:1-45.
  50. Intoh, Michiko 1996 Multi-regional Contacts of Prehistoric Fais Islanders in Micronesia. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 15:111-117.
  51. 1997 Human Dispersals into Micronesia. Anthropological Science 105:15-28. 2008 Ongoing Archaeological Research on Fais Island. Asian Perspectives 47:121- 138. Intoh, Michiko, and Foss Leach 1985 Archaeological Investigations in the Yap Islands, Micronesia: First Millennium BC to the Present Day. BAR International Series 277. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.
  52. Intoh, Michiko, and Nubuo Shigehara 2003 Prehistoric Pig and Dog Remains from Fais Island, Micronesia. Anthropological Science 112:257-267.
  53. Kirch, Patrick V. 1984 The Polynesian Outliers: Continuity, Change, and Replacement. Journal of Pacific History 19:224-238.
  54. 1997 The Lapita Peoples: Ancestors of the Oceanic World. Oxford: Blackwell. 2010 Peopling of the Pacific: A Holistic Anthropological Perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology 39:131-148.
  55. Laguana, Andrew, Hiro Kurashina, Mike T. Carson, John A. Peterson, James M. Bayman, Todd Ames, Rebecca A. Stephenson, John Aguon, and Harya Putra 2012 Estorian i Latte: A Story of Latte. Micronesica 42:80-120.
  56. Leach, Foss, and Graham K. Ward 1981 Archaeology of Kapingamarangi Atoll, a Polynesian Outlier in the Eastern Caroline Islands. Dunedin, New Zealand: Privately published by F. Leach. Liston, Jolie 2005 An Assessment of Radiocarbon Dtes from Palau, Western Micronesia. Radiocarbon 47:295-354.
  57. 2009 Cultural Chronology of Earthworks in Palau, Western Micronesia. Archaeology in Oceania 44:56-73.
  58. Nelson, Greg C., and Scott M. Fitzpatrick 2006 Preliminary Investigations of the Chelechol ra Orrak Cemetery, Republic of Palau: I, Skeletal Biology and Paleopathology. Anthropological Science 114:1-12.
  59. Pawley, Andrew K., and Malcolm D. Ross 1993 Austronesian Historical Linguistics and Culture History. Annual Review of Anthropology 22:425-459.
  60. Pearthree, Erik, and Anne DiPiazza 2003 An "Archaic East Polynesian Assemblage" from the Phoenix and Line Archipelagoes. In Pacific Archaeology: Assessments and Prospects, C. Sand, ed. Pp. 327-336. Cahiers de l'Archéologie en Nouvelle-Calédonie 15. Nouméa, New Caledonia: Service des Musées et du Patrimoine.
  61. Petersen, Glenn 2006 Micronesia's Breadfruit Revolution and the Evolution of a Culture Area. Archaeology in Oceania 41:82-92.
  62. Rainbird, Paul 1994 Prehistory in the North-west Tropical Pacific: The Caroline, Mariana, and Marshall Islands. Journal of World Prehistory 8:293-349.
  63. 2004 The Archaeology of Micronesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Rehg, Kenneth L. 1995 The Significance of Linguistic Interaction Spheres in Reconstructing Micronesian Prehistory. Oceanic Linguistics 34:305-326.
  64. Reid, Lawrence 2002 Morphosyntactic Evidence for the Position of Chamorro in the Austronesian Language Family. In Collected Papers on Southeast Asian and Pacific Languages, R. S. Bauer, ed. Pp. 63-94. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
  65. Ross, Malcolm D. 1996 Is Yapese Oceanic? In Reconstruction, Classification, Description: Feschrift in Honor of Isidore Dyen, B. Nothofer, ed. Pp. 121-166. Hamburg: Abera.
  66. Seikel, Katherine 2011 Mortuary Contexts and Social Structure at Nan Madol, Pohnpei. Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 6:442-460.
  67. Shun, Kanalei, and J. Stephen Athens 1990 Archaeological investigations at Kwajalein Atoll Marshall Islands, Micronesia. In Recent Advances in Micronesian Archaeology, R. L. Hunter-Anderson, ed. Pp. 231-240. Micronesica Supplement 2. Mangilao: University of Guam.
  68. Shutler, Richard, Jr. 1999 The Relationship of Red-slipped and Lime-impressed Pottery of the Southern Philippines to that of Micronesia and the Lapita of Oceania. In Le Pacifique de 5000 à 2000 avant le Présent: Suppléments à l'Histoire d'une Colonisation, J. C. Galipaud and I. Lilley, eds. Pp. 521-529. Paris: Institut pour le Développement.
  69. Sinoto, Yosihiko, ed. 1984 Caroline Islands Archaeology: Investigations on Fefan, Faraulep, Woleai and Lamotrek. Pacific Anthropological Records 35. Honolulu: Bernice P. Bishop Museum.
  70. Spriggs, Matthew, and Atholl Anderson 1993 Late Colonization of East Polynesia. Antiquity 67:200-217.
  71. Stein, Gil J. 2002 From Passive Periphery to Active Agents: Emerging Perspectives in the Archaeology of Interregional Interaction. American Anthropologist 104:903- 916. Summerhayes, Glenn 2007 The Rise and Transformations of Lapita in the Bismarck Archipelago. In From Southeast Asia to the Pacific: Archaeological Perspectives on the Austronesian Expansion and the Lapita Cultural Complex, S. Chiu and C. Sand, eds. Pp. 141-184. Taipei: Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica.
  72. Thomas, Nicholas 1989 The Force of Ethnology: Origins and Significance of the Melanesia/Polynesia Division. Current Anthropology 30: 27-41.
  73. Thomas, Frank R. 2009 Historical Ecology in Kiribati: Linking Past with Present. Pacific Science 63:567-600.
  74. Valentin, Frédérique, Stuart Bedford, Hallie R. Buckley, and Matthew Spriggs 2010 Lapita Burial Practices: Evidence for Complex Body and Bone Treatment at the Teouma Cemetery, Vanuatu, Southwest Pacific. Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 5: 212-235.
  75. Weisler, Marshall I. 1999 The Antiquity of Aroid Pit Agriculture and Significance of Buried A Horizons on Pacific Atolls. Geoarchaeology 14:621-654.
  76. 2001 Precarious Landscapes: Prehistoric Settlement of the Marshall Islands. Antiquity 75:31-32.
  77. Wickler, Stephen K. 2002 Terraces and Villages: Transformation of the Cultural Landscape in Palau. In Pacific Landscapes; Archaeological Approaches in Oceania, T. Ladefoged and M. W. Graves, eds. Pp. 63-96. Los Osos, California: Bearsville Press.
  78. 2004 Modelling Colonisation and Migration in Micronesia from a Zooarchaeological Perspective." In Colonisation, Migration and Marginal Areas: A Zooarchaeological Approach, M. Mondini, S. Munoz, and S. Wickler, eds. Pp. 28-40. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
  79. Zerega, Nyree J. C., Diane Ragone, and Timothy J. Motely 2004 Complex Origins of Breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis, Moraceae): Implications for Human Migration in Oceania. American Journal of Botany 91:760-766.
  80. 2006 Breadfruit Origins, Diversity, and Human-facilitated Distribution. In Darwin's Harvest: Origins, Evolution, and Conservation of Crop Plants, T. J. Motely and N. Zerega, eds. Pp. 213-238. New York: Columbia University Press. Zobel, Erik 2002 The Position of Chamorro and Palauan in the Austronesian Family Tree: Evidence from Verb Morphosyntax. In History and Typology of Western Austronesian Voice Systems, F. Wouk and M. Ross, eds. Pp. 405-434. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What were the earliest known settlement dates in Micronesia?add

The earliest known settlement in Micronesia dates back to 3500 years ago in the Mariana Islands, marking the first permanent human occupation in Remote Oceania.

How do Micronesian languages reflect cultural history?add

Micronesian languages illustrate distinct groupings and histories, indicating that languages from the Marianas and Palau are West Malayo-Polynesian, showing different cultural origins from the broader Oceanic subgroup.

What archaeological evidence supports early inhabitant migrations to Palau?add

In Palau, the oldest known human skeletal remains date to 3000-2700 years ago, coinciding with burials that reveal ritualistic practices similar to those found in Vanuatu's Teouma Cemetery.

How did environmental changes affect early settlers in Micronesia?add

Settlers in the Mariana Islands faced ecological transformations due to lowered sea levels, leading to resource depletion and prompting shifts in habitation strategies around 3000 years ago.

What are the implications of the latte architecture in the Marianas?add

Beginning 1000 years ago, the latte architecture represents significant cultural evolution and possible influences from Island Southeast Asia, indicating increasing complexity in social structures amidst population growth in the Marianas.

About the author
Mike Carson
University of Guam, Department Member

CHOICE Outstanding Academic Title for 2018 "Archaeology of Pacific Oceania: Inhabiting a Sea of Islands"

Papers
98
Followers
455
View all papers from Mike Carsonarrow_forward

Related papers

"Micronesian archaeology." In: The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration
Mike Carson

2013

View PDFchevron_right
Western Polynesia and Fiji: Prehistoric contact, diffusion and differentiation in adjacent archipelagos
Janet Davidson

World Archaeology, 1977

Polynesia has long been regarded as a cultural laboratory by anthropologists (Goodenough 1957; Sahlins 1957), who recognized a unique opportunity to study the adaptive variations of a single culture on its far-flung islands and island groups. Not only are human populations neatly confined on islands separated in many cases by considerable expanses of ocean, but the islands themselves vary greatly in size, resources and degree of isolation. Linguists, also, have found in the numerous discrete but closely related speech communities of Polynesia a fruitful field for the application of the comparative method (Elbert 1953 ; Pawley 1966). Despite many attempts to identify multiple waves of settlement in Polynesia (reviewed in Howard 1967), the orthodox view, to which archaeology has increasingly contributed, is that Polynesian language and culture developed their distinctive features inisolation, probably withinPolynesiaitself (Green 1967 ; Groube 1971). An older generation of ethnologists, concerned particularly with material culture, discussed cultural differences within Polynesia in terms of a variety of processes such as diffusion, local development and inter-island spread (Burrows 1938: 92; Buck 1944: 477-500). However, archaeologists working in Polynesia have been more concerned with establishing chronologies and sequences for individual island groups than with studying inter-island contact and influence. This is largely due to the fact that archaeology is a recent phenomenon in most of Polynesia-in many island groups the introduction of stratigraphie excavation and the application of radiocarbon dating were simultaneous. Moreover, Polynesian archaeology has always been fundamentally influenced by both romantic and scholarly interest in Polynesian origins and migrations. There has consequently been a great emphasis on identifying the date and origin of the first settlement of any island or island group. Although some archaeologists have acknowledged the existence and importance of borrowing in general terms (Green 1967: 216; Bellwood 1974), there has been little serious discussion of the question. Rather, there has been tacit acceptance that something akin to the founder principle of biology may have operated (Vayda and Rappaport 1963) and that later arrivals would have had little effect on established cultures (Sharp 1956: 71). Nor have the advantages and disadvantages of studying island cultures been much discussed by Polynesian archaeologists. Polynesia presents, for example, all the features listed by Evans (1973) in his discussion of islands as laboratories; such features form part of the overall concept of Polynesia as a cultural laboratory but have not been fully exploited in recent analyses of the area's prehistory.

View PDFchevron_right
Austronesian linguistics/ archaeology- A critical evaluation of possible human migrations throughout the Pacific
Richard Giles

This paper investigates potential routes of Austronesian human migrations throughout Remote Oceania, Eastern Polynesia and the Micronesian Islands. It looks at past hypotheses and evaluates their effectiveness in relation to modern linguistic patterns and how this maps onto the archaeological record.

View PDFchevron_right
Human Dispersals into Micronesia
Michiko Intoh

Anthropological Science, 1997

Micronesia received several human dispersals in the prehistoric period . Four major movements of human dispersals into Micronesia are proposed based on the archaeological evidence. The earliest movement around 3600 B .P. to the Mariana Islands was followed by three dispersals to other island groups from west and south at different times. This provides a complicated model compared to what has been proposed by linguistic studies. The heterogeneity of Micronesia is cautiously stressed.

View PDFchevron_right
2011 Are ‘Cultures’ Inherited? Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Origins and Migrations of Austronesian-Speaking Peoples Prior to 1000 BC
Peter Bellwood, Hsiao-chun Hung 洪曉純

In Benjamin W. Roberts and Marc Vander Linden (ed.), Investigating Archaeological Cultures: Material Culture, Variability, and Transmission, pp. 321-354. , 2011

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Archaeology
  • Pacific Islands Archaeology
  • Oceanic Archaeology
    • 580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2026 Academia. All rights reserved