Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Key Takeaways
The Aims and Procedure of This Paper
Some Implications
Conclusions
References
FAQs
All Topics
Anthropology
Anthropological Theory

The Misrepresentation of Anthropology and Its Consequences

Profile image of Herbert S LewisHerbert S Lewis

1998, American Anthropologist

visibility

…

description

16 pages

Abstract

This article deals with several of the most common charges leveled at anthropology, notably that it has regularly and necessarily exorcized "Others," has been ahistorical, and has treated each culture as if it were an isolate, unconnected to any other.The paper demonstrates how inaccurate and easily refutable such claims are and recommends a critical reevaluation of these unexamined and destructive cliches.

Key takeaways
sparkles

AI

  1. The article critiques common misrepresentations of anthropology, calling for a reevaluation of these claims.
  2. Anthropology has historically engaged with history, contrary to claims of ahistoricity.
  3. Critics often mistakenly characterize anthropology as focused solely on exotic 'Others'.
  4. The field has traditionally emphasized cultural interconnectedness, challenging the notion of isolated cultures.
  5. Post-1960s critiques of anthropology reflect broader ideological shifts, not grounded in historical accuracy.

Related papers

Paper -I 1.1 Meaning, scope and development of Anthropology. 1.2 Relationships with other disciplines
sumit kumar

SCDC, 1893

RGTBGRDTGB

View PDFchevron_right
Conclusions: Anthropological Pasts and Futures
Donna M Goldstein

These "Thin Partitions": Bridging the Growing Divide between Cultural Anthropology and Archaeology, 2017

View PDFchevron_right
Anthropology is an odd subject
Maurice Bloch

HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2017

This essay considers the contribution that social and cultural anthropology can make to other disciplines. This contribution is of two sorts. First, anthropology offers a glimpse of what society may have been like for most of human history when the state and its invading presence are absent. Such knowledge cannot be obtained directly but studying communities where the state is remote does give a flavor of what such life is like. Second, anthropology has developed a method of studying others through participation. This method is apparently deceptively straightforward but, nonetheless, it has profound theoretical implications. It is based on the recognition that we can only know those people who at first seem different by sharing what is implicitly involved as they go about their normal life.

View PDFchevron_right
The sins and virtues of anthropology : a reaction to the problem of methodological nationalism
Mariza G S Peirano

Departamento de Antropologia, Universidade de Brasília eBooks, 2003

View PDFchevron_right
Imagining Anthropologyʼs History
Herbert S Lewis

Reviews in Anthropology, 2004

This is a review essay of two books with distinctive claims about the history of anthropology. One offers a basically sympathetic view of American anthropologists of the Left as they struggled with an oppressive capitalist state and world while the other volume is dedicated to the proposition that anthropology is inescapably the heir to the horrors of the colonial past--before there was a discipline of anthropology.

View PDFchevron_right
We are not alone: Anthropology in a world of others
Fred Myers

Ethnos, 2006

he theme of this essay, as of my anthropological history, is 'Anthropology in a World of Others.' My beginning seems a long time ago, as far in the past of the present as the Diary of a Country Priest by George Bernanos seemed to me as a student in the Religion Department of a late-1960s rural Massachusetts liberal arts college. Canberra still had the look of a British colony. It was still the Australia of instant coffee, and not the 'fl at white' or 'long black' of more recent, cosmopolitan days. Some of these memories remain visceral; I can never fl y into Alice Springs and feel the crisp sunny days of a desert winter without a pang of the anxiety, of recognition and expectation, of my fi rst fi eldwork. In a similar fashion, I can no longer think about my career of research and writing without engaging with the (or should I say 'my') historical locations and the horizons that shaped my understandings of the Western Desert Aboriginal people I came to know in the early 1970s. My research began at a signifi cant time. It straddled an anthropological moment marked by disputes about kinship and descent theory and an Australian political period dominated by policies of directed assimilation subsequently eclipsed by the period of Aboriginal land rights and self-deter- Myers.

View PDFchevron_right
Anthropology: History, Theory, Practice, and Engagement
Jack D Eller

2025

Modern anthropology dates its origin to roughly a century ago, in the work of Boas and Malinowski, although its roots are much older. Since its founding as a distinct modern discipline, it has usually identified as a four-field enterprise (cultural or social anthropology, biological or physical anthropology, linguistic anthropology, and archaeology), with of course many local and historical variations. Moreover, it has traditionally been associated with the study of “traditional” or “tribal” societies, although since the 1960s and 1970s it has undergone intense self-criticism and reinvention, including expansion into contemporary subjects and global processes. The chapters in this volume generously reflect the current status of anthropology, featuring contributions on refugees, migration, nationalism, Islam, and the survival of indigenous peoples, as well as the archaeology of pre-modern belief systems. It also confronts many of the field’s present-day disciplinary controversies, such as knowledge production in non-Western societies, the nature and future of ethnography and fieldwork, and the challenge and value of doing anthropology in a time of crisis—especially since the modern world seems to be in a constant state of crisis, altering the mission of anthropology but making it intensely more important.

View PDFchevron_right
An Anthropology of Anthropology: Is it Time to Shift Paradigms?
Raisa Akifeva

Anthropological Forum, 2019

View PDFchevron_right
Paradoxes of Contemporary Anthropology
Michaela Konopikova

Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2013

The main objective of the study is to analyze the state and position of contemporary anthropology. It is based on the examination of the selected anthropological textbooks, which are evaluated taking into consideration currently discussed anthropological issues. Our goal is to provide a contribution to the ongoing debate on the norms and forms of contemporary anthropology.

View PDFchevron_right
Anthropology: The Empire on which the Sun Never Sets
Maximilian Forte

Anthropological Forum: A Journal of Social Anthropology and Comparative Sociology, 2014

Questions and debates about the end of anthropology are highlighted here for their potential value in revealing what the ‘crisis talk’ in the discipline really means, and what it may be masking. In this article the reader is invited to reflect on several questions: about anthropology as a discipline or as a praxis; about how anthropology can be not just revitalised, but revolutionised; about the place of ethnography in anthropology; and about the quest for distinction and the accumulation of disciplinary capital. More broadly, this article deals with the restructuring of anthropology within a context of continued imperialism.

View PDFchevron_right

References (105)

  1. References Cited Abu-Lughod, Lila 1991 Writing against Culture. In Recapturing Anthropol- ogy: Working in the Present. Richard G. Fox, ed. Pp. 137-160. SantaFe,NM: School of American Research.
  2. Appell, George N. 1992 Scholars, True Believers, and the Identity Crisis in American Anthropology. Reviews in Anthropology 21: 193-202.
  3. Asad,Talal,ed. 1973 Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter. London: Ithaca Press.
  4. Barnard, Alan 1992 The Kalahari Debate: A Bibliographical Essay. Edin- burgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  5. Barnard, F.M. 1965 Herder's Social and Political Thought: From Enlight- enment to Nationalism. Oxford: Clarendon.
  6. Bascom, William, and Melville J. Herskovits, eds. 1959 Continuity and Change in African Cultures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  7. Bemal, Martin 1987 Black Athena: The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization, vol. 1: The Fabrication of Ancient Greece. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. 1991 Black Athena: The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization, vol. 2: The Archaeological and Documentary Evidence. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  8. Bernstein, Richard J. 1992 The New Constellation: The Ethical-Political Hori- zons of Modernity/Postmodemity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  9. Biolsi, Thomas, ed. 1997 Indians and Anthropologists: Vine Deloria, Jr., and the Critique of Anthropology. Tucson: University of Ari- zona Press.
  10. Boas, Franz 1887 Review of Die Welt in ihren Spiegelungen unter dem Wandel des Volkergedankens. Science 10:284. 1902 The Jesup North Pacific Expedition. International Congress of Americanists, Thirteenth Session: 91-100. 1908 Decorative Designs of Alaskan Needle-Cases: A Study in the History of Conventional Designs, Based on Materials in the U. S. National Museum. Proceedings of the U. S. National Museum 34:321-344.
  11. 1911 The Mind of Primitive Man. New York: Macmillan. 1920 The Methods of Ethnology. American Anthropolo- gist 22:311-321.
  12. 1945 The Mental Attitude of the Educated Classes. In F. Boas, Race and Democratic Society. Pp. 133-140. New York: J. J. Augustin.
  13. Borofsky, Robert 1993 Assessing Cultural Anthropology. New York: McGraw- Hill.
  14. Brightman, Robert A. 1995 Forget Culture: Replacement, Transcendence, Relex- ification. Cultural Anthropology 10:509-546.
  15. Brown, Bernard E. 1974 Protest in Paris: Anatomy of a Revolt. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
  16. Bunzel,Ruth 1952 Chichicastenango: A Guatemalan Village. New York: J. J. Augustin.
  17. Bush, Ronald 1995 The Presence of the Past Ethnographic Thinking/Lit- erary Politics. In Prehistories of the Future: The Primitivist Project and the Culture of Modernism. Elazar Barkan and Ronald Bush, eds. Pp. 32-41. Stanford, CA: Stanford Uni- versity Press.
  18. Chapman, Charlotte Gower 1971 Milocca: A Sicilian Village. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing.
  19. Coronil, Fernando 1995 Introduction to the Duke University Press Edition. In Cuban Counterpoint Tobacco and Sugar. Fernando Ortiz, ed. Pp. ix-lvi. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  20. D'Andrade,Roy 1995 Moral Models in Anthropology. Current Anthropol- ogy 36:399-408.
  21. Darnton, Robert 1997 George Washington's False Teeth. New York Re- view of Books 44(5):34-38.
  22. Dirks, Nicholas B., ed. 1992 Colonialism and Culture. Ann Arbor University of Michigan Press.
  23. Ebihara, May 1985 American Ethnology in the 1930s: Contexts and Cur- rents. In Social Contexts of American Ethnology, 1840-1984. June Helm, ed. Pp. 101-121. Washington, DC: American Ethnological Society.
  24. Edgar, Adrienne 1993 Review of Writing Women's Worlds. New York: Times Book Review 98 (January 31): 11-12.
  25. Ed wards, Elizabeth, ed. 1992 Anthropology and Photography 1860-1920. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  26. Epstein, A. L. 1992 Scenes from African Urban Life: Collected Copper- belt Papers. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  27. Escobar, Arturo 1993 The Limits of Refkxivity: Politics in Anthropology' s Post-Writing Culture Era. Review article based on Recap- turing Anthropology. Richard G. Fox, ed. Journal of An- thropological Research 49:377-391.
  28. Fabian, Johannes 1983 Time and the Other. How Anthropology Makes Its Object. New York: Columbia University Press.
  29. Fans, James C. 1996 Navajo and Photography: A Critical History of the Repesentation of an American People. Albuquerque: Uni- versity of New Mexico Press.
  30. Ferry, Luc, and Alain Renaut 1990 French Philosophy of the Sixties: An Essay on Anti- humanism. Mary S. Cattani, trans. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
  31. Forster, Peter 1973 Empiricism and Imperialism: A Review of the New Left Critique of Social Anthropology. In Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter. Talal Asad, ed. Pp. 23-38. London: Ithaca Press.
  32. Fox, Richard G., ed. 1991 Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research.
  33. Frank, Andre Gunder, discussant 1990 Culture in Process: Factors Shaping Continuity and Change, Part 2. Session at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, New Orleans, November 29.
  34. Geertz, Clifford 1973 The Impact of the Concept of Culture on the Concept of Man. In The Interpretation of Cultures. Pp. 33-54. New York: Basic Books.
  35. Gluckman.Max 1968 The Utility of die Equilibrium Model in the Analysis of Social Change. American Anthropologist 70:219-237.
  36. Goldschmidt, Walter R. 1947 As You Sow. New York: Harcourt Brace. Goody, Jack 1995 The Expansive Moment: The Rise of British Social Anthropology in Britain and Africa 1918-1970. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press.
  37. Gordon, Robert J. 1997 Picturing Bushmen: The Denver African Expedition of 1925. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
  38. Gough, Kathleen 1968 New Proposals for Anthropologi sts. Current Anthro- pology 9:403-407.
  39. Haraway, Donna 1989 Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modem Science. New York: Routledge.
  40. Hellmann, Ellen 1948 Rooiyard: A Sociological Survey of an Urban Native Slum Yard. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
  41. Hermstein, Richard J., and Charles Murray 1994 The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: The Free Press. Herskovits, Melville J. 1948 Man and His Works. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Hulme, Peter 1995 Elegy for a Dying Race: The Island Caribs and Their Visitors. In Wolves from the Sea: Readings in the Anthro- pology of the Native Caribbean. Neil L. Whitehead, ed. Pp. 61-89. Leiden: KJTLV.
  42. Hume, David [1777] 1965 An Enquiry Concerning Human Under- standing. In Essential Works of David Hume. Ralph Co- hen, ed. Pp. 44-167. New York: Bantam Books. Hunter, Monica 1936 Reaction to Conquest: Effects of Contact with Euro- peans on the Pondo of South Africa. London: Oxford Uni- versity Press.
  43. Hutcheson, Francis [1738] 1967 An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue. In The Scottish Moralists on Human Nature and Society. Louis Schneider, ed. Pp. 39-40. Chi- cago: University of Chicago Press.
  44. Hymes,Dell,ed. 1969 Reinventing Anthropology. New York: Pantheon.
  45. Karp, Ivan, and Steven D. Lavine 1991 Exhibiting Cul tures: The Poetic s and Politics of Mu- seum Display. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
  46. Keesing, Roger M. 1990 Review of The Invention of Primitive Society: Trans- formation of an Illusion. Man 25:168. 1994 Theories of Culture Revisited. In Assessing Cultural Anthropology. Robert Borofsky, ed. Pp. 301-310. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  47. Klein, Kerwin L. 1992 Frontier Tales: The Narrative Construction of Cul- tural Borders in Twentieth-Century California. Compara- tive Studies in Society and History 34:464-490.
  48. Knauft, Bruce 1994 Pushing Anthropology Past the Posts: Critical Notes on Cultural Anthropology and Cultural Studies as Influ- enced by Postmodernism and Existentialism. Critique of Anthropology 14:117-152.
  49. Kuklick, Henrika 1991 The Savage Within: The Social History of British An- thropology, 1885-1945. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer- sity Press.
  50. Kuper, Adam 1973 Anthropologists and Anthropology: The British School, 1922-1972. London: Allan Lane. 1993 Post-Modemism, Cambridge and the Great Kalahari Debate. Social Anthropology 1:57-71.
  51. Lefkowitz, Mary R., and Guy M. Rogers 1996 Black Athena Revisited. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
  52. Lewis, Diane 1973 Anthropology and Colonialism. Current Anthropol- ogy 14:581-597.
  53. Lewis, Herberts. 1963 Jimma Abba Jifan A Despotic Galla Kingdom. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University. Published as A Galla Monarchy: Jimma Abba Jifar, Ethiopia, 1930-1932. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1965. Lin ton, Ralph 1936 The Study of Man. New York: Appleton-Century.
  54. Loizos, Peter 1977 Anthropological Research in British Colonies: Some Personal Accounts. Anthropological Forum 4(2): 137- 144. Lovejoy, Arthur O. 1948 Essays in the History of Ideas. New York: G. P. Put- nam'sSons.
  55. Lowie, Robert H. 1920 Primitive Society. New York: Boni and Liveright.
  56. Lutz, Catherine A., and Jane L. Collins 1993 Reading National Geographic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  57. Lyman, ChristopherM. 1982 The Vanishing Race and Other Illusions: Photo- graphs of Indians by Edward S. Curtis. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
  58. Malinowski, Bronislaw 1945 The Dynamics of Culture Change: An Inquiry into Race Relations in Africa. Phyllis Kaberry, ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  59. Malinowski, B., and J. de laFuente 1982 Malinowski in Mexico: The Economics of a Mexican Market System. Susan Drucker-Brown, ed. London: Rout- ledge and Kegan Paul.
  60. Manners, Robert A. 1965 Remittances and the Units of Analysis in Anthropo- logical Research. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 21:179-195.
  61. Marcus, George E., and Michael D. Fischer 1986 Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  62. McGrane, Bernard 1989 Beyond Anthropology: Society and the Other. New York: Columbia University Press.
  63. Mead, Margaret 1932 The Changing Culture of an Indian Tribe. New York: Columbia University Press.
  64. Miner, Horace M. 1939 St. Denis: A French-Canadian Parish. Chicago: Uni- versity of Chicago Press.
  65. Montaigne, Michel de 1948 The Complete Essays of Montaigne. Donald M. Frame, trans. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  66. Moore, Sally F. 1994 Anthropology and Africa: Changing Perspectives on a Changing Scene. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia. Murdock, George P. 1949 Social Structure. New York: Macmillan. New Yorker 1992 Review of Equatoria. December 14:139.
  67. Nietzsche, Friedrich 11886] 1973 Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philoso- phy of the Future. R. J. Hollingdale, trans. Harmonds- worth, UK: Penguin Books. Nugent, Stephen 1996 Postmodernism. In Encyclopedia of Social and Cul- tural Anthropology. Alan Barnard and Jonathan Spencer, eds. Pp. 442-445. London: Routledge.
  68. Ortiz, Fernando 1947 Cuban Counterpoint: Tobacco and Sugar. New York: A. A. Knopf.
  69. Parsons, Elsie Clews 1936 Mitla: Town of the Souls. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  70. Perry, Richard J. 1992 Why Do Multiculturalists Ignore Anthropologists? The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 4: A52-53.
  71. Perry, William J. 1924 The Growth of Civilization. London: Methuen.
  72. Powdermaker, Hortense 1939 After Freedom: A Cultural Study in the Deep South. New York: Atheneum.
  73. 1966 Stranger and Friend: The Way of an Anthropologist. New York: W. W. Norton.
  74. Radin, Paul 1910 A Sketch of the Peyote Cult of the Winnebago: A Study in Borrowing. Journal of Religious Psychology 7:1-22.
  75. 1975 The Italians of San Francisco: Their Adjust- ment and Acculturation. New York: Arno.
  76. Reyna,S.P. 1994 Literary Anthropology and the Case against Science. Man 29:555-581.
  77. Rorabaugh, William J. 1989 Berkeley at War The 1960s. Oxford: Oxford Univer- sity Press.
  78. Rosaldo, Renato 1994 Whose Cultural Studies? American Anthropologist 96:525-529.
  79. Roseberry, William 1995 Latin American Peasant Studies in a "PostcoloniaT Era. Journal of Latin American Anthropology 1:150-177.
  80. Rosenau, Pauline M. 1992 Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences: Insights, Inroads, and Intrusions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univer- sity Press.
  81. Said, Edward 1978 Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.
  82. Schneider, David M. 1995 Schneider on Schneider The Conversion of the Jews and Other Anthropological Stories. David M. Schneider as Told to Richard Handler. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  83. Smith, G. Elliot (sometimes Elliot Smith, G.) 1911 The Ancient Egyptians and Their Influence upon the Civilization of Europe. London: Harper. 1923 The Ancient Egyptians and the Origin of Civilization. London: Harper.
  84. Spiro, Melford 1992 A Critique of Cultural Relativism with Special Refer- ence to Epistemological Relativism. In Anthropological Other or Burmese Brother. Pp. 3-51. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
  85. 1996 Postmodernist Anthropology, Subjectivity, and Sci- ence: A Modernist Critique. Comparative Studies in Soci- ety and History 38:759-780.
  86. Stanton, William R. 1960 The Leopard's Spots: Scientific Attitudes toward Race in America, 1815-59. Chicago: University of Chi- cago Press.
  87. Steiner, Christopher B. 1995 Travel Engravings and the Construction of the Primi- tive. In Prehistories of the Future: The Primitivist Project and the Culture of Modernism. Elazar Barkan and Ronald Bush, eds. Pp. 202-225. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  88. Steward, Julian H. 1950 Area Research: Theory and Practice. New York: So- cial Science Research Council.
  89. Steward, Julian H., et al. 1956 The People of Puerto Rico: A Study in Social Anthro- pology. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  90. Stocking, George W., Jr. 1968
  91. Race, Culture, and Evolution: Essays in the History of Anthropology. New York: The Free Press. 1976 Ideas and Institutions in American Anthropology: Toward a History of the Interwar Period. In Selected Pa- pers from the American Anthropologist, 1921-1945.
  92. George W. Stocking Jr., ed. Pp. 1^44. Washington. DC: American Anthropological Association. 1995 After Tylon British Social Anthropology, 1888- 1951. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  93. Stocking, George W., Jr., ed. 1991 Colonial Situations: Essays on the Contextualization of Ethnographic Knowledge. Madison: University of Wis- consin Press.
  94. Taussig, Michael 1987 Shamanism, Colonialism, and the Wild Man: A Study in Terror and Healing. Chicago: University of Chi- cago Press.
  95. Thomas, Nicholas 1994 Colonialism's Culture: Anthropology, Travel, and Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 1996 History and Anthropology. In Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology. Alan Barnard and Jonathan Spencer, eds. Pp. 272-277. London: Routledge. Torgovnick, Marianna 1990 Gone Primitive: Savage Intellects, Modem Lives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  96. Turner, Terence 1991 Representing, Resisting. Rethinking: Historical Transformations of Kayapo Culture and Anthropological Consciousness. In Colonial Situations: Essays on the Con- textualization of Ethnographic Knowledge. George W. Stocking, ed. Pp. 285-313. Madison: University of Wis- consin Press.
  97. 1993 Anthropology and Multiculturalism: What Is Anthro- pology That Multiculturalists Should Be Mindful of It? Cultural Anthropology 8:411-429.
  98. Tylor, Edward B. 1871 Primitive Culture. Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Language, Art, and Custom, 2 vols. London: John Murray.
  99. Visweswaran, Kamala 1998 Race and the Culture of Anthropology. American Anthropologist 100(1 ):70-83.
  100. Voltaire [1738] 1963 Essay on the Customs and the Spirit of Na- tions. In Voltaire: The Age of Louis XIV and Other Se- lected Writings. J. H. Brumfitt, trans. Pp. 240-311. New York: Washington Square Press.
  101. Wacquant, Loic, discussant 1993 Establishing Anthropological Agenda for the 1990s: An Intergenerational Dialogue. Session at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Washington, DC, November 18.
  102. Wallerstein.I. 19% Open the Social Sciences. Items 50(1): 1-7.
  103. Warner, Mildred H. 1988 W. Lloyd Warner Social Anthropologist New York: Publishing Center for Cultural Resources.
  104. Warner, W. Lloyd, and Paul S. Lunt 1941 The Social Life of a Modem Community. Yankee City Series, vol. 1. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  105. Weinberg, Steven 1996 Sokal's Hoax. The New York Review of Books Wolf, Eric 1994 Perilous Ideas: Race, Culture, People. Current An- thropology 35:1-7.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What explains the contemporary critiques of anthropology's methodological foundations?add

Contemporary critiques often stem from postmodernist thought and the disenchantment with established scientific paradigms, emerging after the 1960s protests against capitalism and colonialism.

How does the article counter the notion that anthropology exoticizes its subjects?add

The paper illustrates that claims of anthropology's uniform 'exoticizing' are unfounded, citing historical anthropologists like Franz Boas, who emphasized cultural commonalities.

When did the claim of anthropology's ahistoricity gain traction?add

The perception of anthropology as ahistorical became prominent in the late 20th century, particularly through critiques from figures like Roger Keesing.

What evidence suggests anthropology has historically recognized cultural interconnectedness?add

The paper cites the work of Robert H. Lowie and Franz Boas, who focused on cultural diffusion and connections as early as the 1920s.

Why is there a perceived disconnect between students and older anthropological theories?add

A 'chasm' has developed due to the current discourse that overlooks earlier anthropological knowledge, leading to the dismissal of foundational ideas.

Related papers

THEORIES IN ANTHROPOLOGY: AN INTIMATE LEARNING WITH THE 'OTHER'
Rajakishor Mahana
View PDFchevron_right
Anthropology'challenged: notes for a debate
João Pina-Cabral

JOURNAL-ROYAL ANTHROPOLOGICAL INSTITUTE, 2006

In January 2006, the international community of anthropologists was confronted with a surprising piece of news. France's principal funding body, the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), was contemplating striking anthropology out of its disciplinary list, attributing to it a subsidiary position within the field of history. A heated debate ensued concerning anthropology's independent position within the CNRS funding structure. One does not know whether it was thought that anthropology always had been a branch of history or whether it was thought that it always should have been or, alternatively, if the idea was that it was simply irrelevant! Ultimately, in the face of national and international outcry, the proposal was dropped and the change was not implemented. We were all very pleased about that outcome. Many of us, however, remained preoccupied by it all, feeling that a misunderstanding on that scale should not be treated as an isolated event. Rather, it should be seen as a sign that the public understanding of anthropology is not what it should be, that the issue is in bad need of further debate. 1 How ironic that this mishap should have occurred on the turf of Marcel Mauss and Lévi-Strauss, where modern anthropology was born! Now, let it be clear from the start that anthropologists have nothing against history or historians -to the contrary. Never has the dialogue between the two disciplines been richer than over the past two decades. Their disciplinary history, however, remains radically distinct. Their contributions to the humanities and the social sciences are not in competition; rather they are mutually indispensable parts of the more general socio-scientific field that modernity has launched.

View PDFchevron_right
Introductory Chapter: The Many Lives of Anthropology
Jack D Eller

Anthropology: History, Theory, Practice, and Engagement`2025

For the present volume, which is conceived as a retrospective and prospective on, a celebration and critique of, the discipline of anthropology, Howell’s and Dieserud’s diagnoses are an interesting provocation and opportunity. Accordingly, this introductory chapter seizes the occasion to survey the territory that anthropology has trod not only during the past century since Malinowski and Boas established it firmly as an ethnographic science but from the earliest stirrings of what we could call the ethnographic impulse, the desire to describe—and more than describe, but to explain and understand—the nature of humanity through its diversity. The history of anthropology has, of course, become something of an industry, embodied best in the works of George Stocking, but there is abundant if not endless—and contentious—material for pondering the origins and evolution of the field, which is an apt undertaking for the book you are about to read. What we will find is many incarnations, in the past and the present alike, of anthropology—that it has lived many lives and displayed as much diversity as the humankind that it aspires to know.

View PDFchevron_right
Two Things Wrong with Anthropology
Jim Harries

academia.edu, 2022

The first of my issues, is that anthropology is extractive, yet that anthropological reports subsequently direct ‘indigenous’ research. Secondly, perhaps my main problem with anthropology, arises from its orientation to pleasing secularists (acquiring mainstream anthropological credibility seems to require rendering of any ‘religious’ commitment overtly subservient to secularism’s hegemony).

View PDFchevron_right
The challenges of anthropology
Thomas Hylland Eriksen

2010

Although anthropology is often associated with studies of small-scale societies, traditional cultures or arcane customs, this article argues that anthropology is first and foremost a way of thinking that can be applied to any aspect of human life. As such, it is complementary to and a useful supplement to other human sciences such as psychology and economics. Anthropology distinguishes itself by trying to account for human diversity, studied through long-term fieldwork and analysed via comparative methods. By virtue of its ethnographic method, anthropology produces unique insights into the informal dimension of social and cultural life, emphasising the contrasts between what people say and what they do, and between the formal structure of society and what actually happens. In the endeavour to understand the human condition, anthropology is one of several indispensable tools.

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • History of Anthropology
  • Anthropology and History
  • Anthropology and History
  • Anthropology and History
    • 580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2026 Academia. All rights reserved