Think AI coding tools are speeding up work? Think again – they’re actually slowing developers down
AI coding tools may be hindering the work of experienced software developers, according to new research
AI might actually be slowing down software developers, new research suggests, despite their own positive predictions that AI coding tools will help their work.
Model Evaluation & Threat Research (METR) ran a randomized, controlled trial to study the use of early-2025 AI tools used by experienced developers working on their own open source repositories.
The results weren't positive, with the study finding that developers take 19% longer on average when using AI tools.
That said, METR noted this is a single snapshot of AI capabilities in a single setting — results may vary, METR's essentially saying — and the company hopes to use the figures as a baseline to track and estimate AI acceleration and adoption.
Experienced developers aren’t seeing benefits
METR's study used 16 developers with at least five years of experience who provided a list of 246 issues, such as bug fixes or wished-for features, that would make up their real day-to-day work. The developers in the study largely used Cursor Pro and Claude Sonnet.
"When developers are allowed to use AI tools, they take 19% longer to complete issues—a significant slowdown that goes against developer beliefs and expert forecasts," the post noted.
"This gap between perception and reality is striking: developers expected AI to speed them up by 24%, and even after experiencing the slowdown, they still believed AI had sped them up by 20%."
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report - the leading guidance on AI, cybersecurity and other IT challenges as per 700+ senior executives
The METR team listed a few factors they believe likely contributed to the slowdown — the first of which was simply being over-optimistic about the usefulness of AI.
Beyond that, the study showed developers accepted fewer than 44% of AI generated code, with most of those taking part in the study saying they had to make major changes to clean up code. All told, roughly 9% of their time was spent reviewing or cleaning AI output.
Developers reported that AI appeared to struggle in large, complex environments, while the human coders themselves had so much experience in their areas of expertise that the AI couldn't keep up, an issue exacerbated by the fact that it "doesn't utilize important tacit knowledge or context."
The researchers also spotted a few potential causes for the AI slowdown, though they stressed the impact was unclear. That included developers using the AI to experiment and waiting on AI to generate code.
The researchers stressed that the results don't mean that AI is never useful. "Furthermore, these results do not imply that future models will not speed up developers in this exact setting — this is a salient possibility given the rapid pace of progress in AI capabilities recently," the paper said.
"Finally, it remains possible that further improvements to current AI systems (e.g. better prompting/agent scaffolding, or domain-specific finetuning) could yield positive speed up in this setting."
Does AI help or hinder?
Studying real-world impact is necessary, METR said, as AI benchmarks are often unrealistic or can't be easily applied to real-world tasks.
"While coding/agentic benchmarks have proven useful for understanding AI capabilities, they typically sacrifice realism for scale and efficiency—the tasks are self-contained, don’t require prior context to understand, and use algorithmic evaluation that doesn’t capture many important capabilities," the post noted.
"These properties may lead benchmarks to overestimate AI capabilities."
The METR study follows research by Atlassian that suggested AI tools are saving 86% of developers a full day of work each week, letting them focus on improving code quality or creating new features.
However, half of those surveyed said they are losing that AI-gained time because of "organisational inefficiencies" — essentially, bad management is eating up any savings.
"This pressure-cooked mix of innovation and strain demands a closer look at how AI is reshaping the developer experience, and what that means for the future of software development across the industry,” said Atlassian CTO Rajeev Rajan.
Make sure to follow ITPro on Google News to keep tabs on all our latest news, analysis, and reviews.
MORE FROM ITPRO
- CEOs think workers are becoming hostile to AI tools, but they’re pushing ahead with adoption anyway
- AI coding tools are finally delivering results for enterprises
- Big tech promised developers productivity gains with AI tools – now they’re being rendered obsolete
Freelance journalist Nicole Kobie first started writing for ITPro in 2007, with bylines in New Scientist, Wired, PC Pro and many more.
Nicole the author of a book about the history of technology, The Long History of the Future.
-
Google CEO Sundar Pichai says vibe coding has made software development ‘exciting again’News Google CEO Sundar Pichai claims software development has become “exciting again” since the rise of vibe coding, but some devs are still on the fence about using AI to code.
-
15-year-old revealed as key player in Scattered LAPSUS$ HuntersNews 'Rey' says he's trying to leave Scattered LAPSUS$ Hunters and is prepared to cooperate with law enforcement
-
Google CEO Sundar Pichai thinks software development is 'exciting again' thanks to vibe coding — but developers might disagreeNews Google CEO Sundar Pichai claims software development has become “exciting again” since the rise of vibe coding, but some devs are still on the fence about using AI to code.
-
Open source AI models are cheaper than closed source competitors and perform on par, so why aren’t enterprises flocking to them?Analysis Open source AI models often perform on-par with closed source options and could save enterprises billions in cost savings, new research suggests, yet uptake remains limited.
-
‘Slopsquatting’ is a new risk for vibe coding developers – but it can be solved by focusing on the fundamentalsNews Malicious packages in public code repositories can be given a sheen of authenticity via AI tools
-
Microsoft’s Windows chief wants to turn the operating system into an ‘agentic OS' – users just want reliability and better performanceNews While Microsoft touts an AI-powered future for Windows, users want the tech giant to get back to basics
-
Google Brain founder Andrew Ng thinks everyone should learn programming with ‘vibe coding’ tools – industry experts say that’s probably a bad ideaNews Vibe coding might help lower the barrier to entry for non-technical individuals, but users risk skipping vital learning curves, experts warn.
-
European software spending is set to surge in 2026 – here's whyNews Enterprises are approaching the “trough of disillusionment” with AI, but it’s not stopping them from spending
-
AI is transforming Agile development practices as teams battle mounting delivery cycle pressure and ROI concernsNews The influx of AI tools is helping reshape Agile development at a critical juncture for the methodology
-
UK software developers are still cautious about AI, and for good reasonNews Experts say developers are “right to take their time” with AI coding solutions given they still remain a nascent tool
