Liquid Compute’s cover photo
Liquid Compute

Liquid Compute

Securities and Commodity Exchanges

New York City, New York 2,162 followers

The financial layer for superintelligence

About us

Liquid Compute is the financial layer for AI compute. First CFTC-regulated exchange for AI Infrastructure. Pending CFTC DCM and DCO registration as PMEX Markets/Clearing. Backed by Y Combinator.

Website
https://liquidcompute.com/
Industry
Securities and Commodity Exchanges
Company size
2-10 employees
Headquarters
New York City, New York
Type
Privately Held
Founded
2025

Locations

Employees at Liquid Compute

Updates

  • This update is the first part of an ongoing series on our GPU Offtaker Credit Map. Thanks Stanley Lee for your thoughts. Look in the comments for the rest of our published research.

    The response to our GPU Offtaker Credit Map was more than we expected. Lenders asked how to use it, operators asked who to sign, and companies asked how to move up. So we're turning it into a multi-part series, one tier at a time. Each part covers who's in the tier, the deals in the market, how lenders should structure them, and how companies get financed on better terms. Part 1 starts at the top, because Tier 1 is the benchmark. It's the deal a lender gets when the buyer's balance sheet does all the work: 3–5 year terms, little or no prepay, a parent guarantee where a subsidiary signs. Every structure in the tiers below (prepayment, reserves, letters of credit, step-in rights) is a way to get lenders to that same place. That's where most compute buyers sit today, and where the most interesting financing is being done. A few things from Tier 1: -Take-or-pay compute contracts are debt in disguise, and lenders underwrite them that way. -Half of Tier 1 isn't AI. Trading firms, fintechs and data companies buy compute at scale and are rarely pitched. -The watch item is total commitments, not any single contract. -Each tier from here gets more interesting than the last. Look out for part 2 in the coming days... If you're a lender or capital allocator active in compute, or a company looking for financing, reach out to us at Liquid Compute

  • Liquid Compute reposted this

    The response to our GPU Offtaker Credit Map was more than we expected. Lenders asked how to use it, operators asked who to sign, and companies asked how to move up. So we're turning it into a multi-part series, one tier at a time. Each part covers who's in the tier, the deals in the market, how lenders should structure them, and how companies get financed on better terms. Part 1 starts at the top, because Tier 1 is the benchmark. It's the deal a lender gets when the buyer's balance sheet does all the work: 3–5 year terms, little or no prepay, a parent guarantee where a subsidiary signs. Every structure in the tiers below (prepayment, reserves, letters of credit, step-in rights) is a way to get lenders to that same place. That's where most compute buyers sit today, and where the most interesting financing is being done. A few things from Tier 1: -Take-or-pay compute contracts are debt in disguise, and lenders underwrite them that way. -Half of Tier 1 isn't AI. Trading firms, fintechs and data companies buy compute at scale and are rarely pitched. -The watch item is total commitments, not any single contract. -Each tier from here gets more interesting than the last. Look out for part 2 in the coming days... If you're a lender or capital allocator active in compute, or a company looking for financing, reach out to us at Liquid Compute

  • Announcing the Liquid Compute GPU Offtaker Credit Map We assessed 200 private buyers of compute and ranked 169 on a single, transparent credit framework. Our findings cut against consensus: the strongest private offtakers are trading firms and profitable private corporates, not necessarily best-known AI labs. We released this because the real bottleneck to access compute is capital markets. Capacity gets built when someone will finance it, and financing turns on a question nobody had a shared answer to: can this buyer keep paying for the full term? The framework is published in full, and we intend it to become the stepping stone for providing greater transparency about counterparty credit. If you buy, build or finance compute, we want to hear from you. If you are on the list and think we have you wrong, please reach out. We welcome all comments and direct feedback on the methodology.

  • Oracle has reportedly sent a force majeure notice to the developer of Project Jupiter, its 2.45GW Stargate campus in New Mexico. It is seeking the right to defer payments if the site misses its 2028 date. Oracle says the project is on schedule and Blue Owl Capital says commitments are unchanged. The market is trading like it matters anyway. Three read-throughs for compute markets: 𝐒𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐥𝐲 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐧𝐨𝐰. Power, permits and local opposition are delaying capacity, and data centers are becoming a campaign issue heading into the midterms. Every delayed gigawatt pushes demand onto capacity that already exists. 𝐆𝐏𝐔𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞. That supports near-dated pricing and residual values for operators with live capacity, and widens the gap between built and unbuilt. 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐬 𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐫𝐞-𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐰𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧. A lease or take-or-pay is only as firm as its delay, force majeure and termination language. Lenders will read those clauses first now. Here's the problem. When a contract like this wobbles, nobody can answer the basic questions: what is it worth today, what is the capacity worth if it gets re-let, and how do you hedge the exposure. There is no standard contract, no independent reference price, and no way to transfer the risk. That is the gap Liquid Compute is built to close. We have three pieces: - A price index for GPU compute - Independent marks on contracts and collateral for lenders - Cash-settled instruments that let operators, buyers and lenders hedge against that index Credit markets solved this problem decades ago and compute is next. https://lnkd.in/df7NNjd6

  • H200 rental rates have climbed back to where they stood at launch, even as Blackwell-generation B200s and B300s come online at scale. This is a clear signal that demand for compute is outpacing supply across every generation, and that prior-generation hardware is holding its value far better than most depreciation models assumed. For anyone buying, selling, or financing GPUs, it's a reminder that compute pricing is less about the chip on the spec sheet and more about who has capacity available when it's needed. https://lnkd.in/dh5QM2Wx

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Liquid Compute reposted this

    One interesting trade keeps coming up in almost every conversation we're having in compute right now. An operator offers a three-year block of GPUs at a price that looks cheap next to what the same capacity rents for by the month. Buy it long, sell it short, keep the spread. On a B300 today, that gap is well over a dollar an hour. It's the same trade a landlord makes on a long lease, or a utility makes buying power forward, and it's a good one if you understand what you're underwriting. Most people pricing it look at the spread. The number that actually matters is breakeven fill, i.e. at today's prices you need about 80% of your hours sold just to cover the contract, and the months you can't fill tend to be the months prices are falling. We put together a primer on how the trade works, what it pays, where it breaks, and how to hedge the part of it you can. If you've been offered a block and want to know what this looks like, or want to just learn more, you can reach us here: https://lnkd.in/gX2Dn5Mb

  • Liquid Compute reposted this

    Bittersweet, but after eight years it's time for me to hang up the bond-trading cleats and say goodbye to credit trading! Happy to share that I have started as Chief Product Officer at Liquid Compute. I didn't see this coming a year ago. But as more GPU and data center deals came to market and we spent time underwriting them, what kept pulling me in wasn't the credit. It was the market underneath within compute that was being built. No standard contract, no reference price, no way to hedge anything, everyone trading off relationships, phone calls, and Slack channels. Anyone who traded credit in the early days will recognize it immediately, and will know exactly where it goes from here. It's an exciting moment for all of us at Liquid Compute. We just closed our seed round and came out of stealth last week. https://lnkd.in/p/dT98vtmc To everyone in credit I worked alongside, traded with, partnered with, and learned from over the last eight years, thank you. You learn this business across a desk from people willing to explain why they're doing what they're doing, and I got very lucky with the people around me across Point72, Laurion and Barclays. I'll be based in SF. If you're out here and building in compute or thinking about financing it, reach out. Would be great to connect!

  • We are pleased to welcome Stanley Lee as our new Chief Product Officer on the Liquid Compute team! He will lead product across the business as we build the venue to buy, sell, trade, and finance compute. Please join us in extending a warm welcome as we take this important step forward together. Stanley brings a career in credit markets to the compute space, most recently as a high yield and distressed trader at Point72. Before that, he was an OTC market maker at Barclays, trading high yield bonds and CDS, and he helped build out the high yield/distressed effort at Laurion Capital Management LP. His background spans distressed and high yield credit, OTC market structure, and derivatives and structured products. He was an early participant in neocloud credit and GPU-backed loans. That work shaped the thesis behind his move: compute today looks like early-day OTC credit, bilateral and opaque, with no standard contract, no reference price, and no way to transfer risk. The sequence that fixed credit markets is the same one that will build this one, starting with standardized documentation and a published price. As CPO, Stanley owns product across all four of our businesses: the brokerage where physical capacity is bought and sold, the LCI index series and forward curve, the derivatives that reference them, and the credit products that finance compute contracts and fleets. He will drive how those pieces fit together into a single venue, from the reference spec and normalization standards that make a GPU-hour comparable, to the contracts, benchmarks, and risk transfer tools that let operators, buyers, and lenders transact with confidence. Welcome aboard!

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Liquid Compute reposted this

    View organization page for K8

    1,366 followers

    AI’s next phase will require more than compute capacity. It will require the financial infrastructure to price it, finance it, and manage the risk around it. We’re proud to back Liquid Compute as it builds the capital markets layer for AI compute. “Compute is becoming a strategic commodity, and AI’s continued growth will depend on making its market more transparent, efficient, and financeable. Liquid Compute is building the connective layer between developers, infrastructure providers, and capital that can help the entire ecosystem scale.” - Andre Koo, Founder and GP at K8. The Wall Street Journal article below.

    View profile for Mark Fiorentino

    Managing Partner & Head of Venture Capital at K8

    Liquid Compute: The AI Buildout Needs a Financial System to Match When I started my career in the late 2000s, I worked with companies helping enterprises hedge their biggest costs and exposures. Fuel for an airline. Wheat for a food producer. FX for a global business. Different industries, same problem: you could execute well and still watch your margins get crushed by something you didn’t control. Today, compute is bringing that problem to AI. Which chips? Open-weight or managed models? Own the infrastructure or rent it? Which workloads need sovereign capacity? These are technology decisions with very real financing and margin consequences. And “compute will get cheaper” isn’t an answer for the operator that financed hardware against yesterday’s assumptions. Enter Liquid Compute, building the capital markets layer for AI compute: a physical marketplace, pricing benchmarks, and derivatives, while working toward a regulated exchange and clearinghouse. Buyers want visibility into costs. Operators want predictable revenue. Lenders want to manage the price exposure underneath their loans. Liquid Compute is connecting those needs. My close friend and former Index colleague Mark Goldberg at Chemistry introduced me to CEO Ronit Jain. An hour together one Friday evening left me blown away by his technical depth and commercial maturity. He was already proving people would transact, not just pitching why the market should exist. Ronit and co-founder Aarav Patel are Berkeley engineers (go Bears!) who combine technical credibility with real commercial hunger. Ronit brings finance training; Aarav brings the product ambition and ability to pull people into a bigger vision. They’ve surrounded themselves with talent from NVIDIA, Meta, Google Cloud, Jump, and Point72. That’s a big swing. Exactly the kind we want to take with this team. At K8, this sits at the center of our hybrid equity and credit model. AI infrastructure companies need equity to build something new AND financing to deliver against demand that already exists. “Raise another equity round” isn’t always the answer. We focus credit on assets and contract-backed cash flows that can actually be underwritten (think offtake agreements or B300 chips). Through the Koo family’s relationships, we bridge Taiwan’s AI hardware ecosystem and the companies building on top of it. Across multi-chip infrastructure, sovereign compute, robotics, and AI applications, having demand isn’t the same as having the hardware and financing to serve it. Liquid Compute adds a critical piece: better pricing and risk management could make more of that ecosystem financeable. We’re excited to back Liquid Compute's $15m seed round, co-led by Chemistry and FirstMark, alongside longtime friends Mark Goldberg, Bohan Lou, and Adam Nelson. The next phase of AI needs more than access to compute. It needs better ways to pay for it, price it, and manage the risk around it. Let’s go. - The Wall Street Journal article below

    • No alternative text description for this image

Similar pages