This update is the first part of an ongoing series on our GPU Offtaker Credit Map. Thanks Stanley Lee for your thoughts. Look in the comments for the rest of our published research.
The response to our GPU Offtaker Credit Map was more than we expected. Lenders asked how to use it, operators asked who to sign, and companies asked how to move up. So we're turning it into a multi-part series, one tier at a time. Each part covers who's in the tier, the deals in the market, how lenders should structure them, and how companies get financed on better terms. Part 1 starts at the top, because Tier 1 is the benchmark. It's the deal a lender gets when the buyer's balance sheet does all the work: 3–5 year terms, little or no prepay, a parent guarantee where a subsidiary signs. Every structure in the tiers below (prepayment, reserves, letters of credit, step-in rights) is a way to get lenders to that same place. That's where most compute buyers sit today, and where the most interesting financing is being done. A few things from Tier 1: -Take-or-pay compute contracts are debt in disguise, and lenders underwrite them that way. -Half of Tier 1 isn't AI. Trading firms, fintechs and data companies buy compute at scale and are rarely pitched. -The watch item is total commitments, not any single contract. -Each tier from here gets more interesting than the last. Look out for part 2 in the coming days... If you're a lender or capital allocator active in compute, or a company looking for financing, reach out to us at Liquid Compute