Sign in to view John’s full profile
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Sign in to view John’s full profile
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Sign in to view John’s full profile
John can introduce you to 10+ people at Kigo
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
3K followers
500+ connections
Sign in to view John’s full profile
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
View mutual connections with John
John can introduce you to 10+ people at Kigo
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
View mutual connections with John
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Sign in to view John’s full profile
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
About
Welcome back
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
New to LinkedIn? Join now
Experience & Education
-
Kigo
**** ********* **********
-
********* ****
******** ******* ******* ******** *******
-
** *******
******* ******** **********
-
************ ********** * ******* ****** ** **********
****** ** ******** ************** * *** undefined undefined
-
-
**** ****** **********
** ********* *** ******* ******* ******
-
View John’s full experience
See their title, tenure and more.
Welcome back
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
New to LinkedIn? Join now
or
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
View John’s full profile
-
See who you know in common
-
Get introduced
-
Contact John directly
Other similar profiles
-
Jim O'Donnell (James O'Donnell)
Jim O'Donnell (James O'Donnell)
Checklists4Business - - Jaguar Management Consulting, Inc.
15K followersWolfeboro, NH
Explore more posts
-
Deepak Maloo
Swiggy • 7K followers
Speed is a competitive advantage, until it becomes a product’s autopsy. We’re often told: "If you aren't embarrassed by your first version, you launched too late." But there is a dangerous tipping point where being fast means being functionally deprived. If you strip away the baseline utility required to solve the core friction point, you aren't testing an idea—you're sabotaging it. The Google Hangouts Lesson: When Google Talk transitioned to Hangouts, they launched superior video and group-chat tech. But they removed a tiny, "boring" feature: the status indicator (the green dot). Without knowing who was actually available to chat, the daily habit broke. By the time the team realized the "green dot" was a foundation rather than a luxury, users had already migrated to Slack and WhatsApp. In the rush to ship "cool" infrastructure, they missed the functional baseline. Of course, these misses are often only visible in hindsight. But the risk remains: releasing a version so lean that it fails to address the "last mile" of the user's problem. For a product to fly, an M1 should be a "Version 1," not a "Half Version." If you ship something functionally incomplete and the metrics come back cold, you risk killing a billion-dollar idea simply because of a hundred-dollar execution. Have you ever seen a great idea killed because the M1 was too lean to solve the core problem? Where do you draw the line between "fast" and "functional"? #ProductManagement #Startups #MVP #ProductStrategy #M1 #TechInsights
5
-
Dmitry Shevelenko
Perplexity • 24K followers
I rarely make predictions, but... No company founded after 2026 will organically grow to more than 10k FTEs. The leverage of rapid iterative decision loops by teams using best-in-class AI has reached escape velocity over traditional economies of scale.
126
11 Comments -
Apoorv Durga, Ph.D.
The Real Story Group • 4K followers
<article link in first comment> My daughter Divija told me my last LinkedIn post was ‘cringe’. She may have been right, so back to the usual programming. If you’re evaluating “agent” announcements from every martech vendor, here are some points to note: - If your use-case/scenario stays inside the vendor's suite/platform, those agents can be great. - If it spans 5–7 systems, the hard part is not the agent. It’s how you manage the control plane: shared context, consistent policy/consent, and one end-to-end audit trail across systems. How to tell: when a vendor demo crosses systems, do you see one shared run log and policy enforcement end-to-end, or does the story turn into “configure connectors”? The article lays out the tradeoffs and a pragmatic pattern: independent orchestration above, local execution inside each platform. #MarTech #AI #MarketingOperations #EnterpriseArchitecture #AgenticAI
15
3 Comments -
Daniel Pelaez
CYVL • 7K followers
Why does paving roads in the U.S. cost SO MUCH?? South Carolina DOT spent $375,000 per mile - twice as much as its northern neighbor. David Zipper's fantastic Bloomberg CityLab article dives in and uncovers what I've been hearing anecdotally for years “If you increase an engineer’s quality from the 25th percentile to the 75th percentile, that reduces costs by 14%” That line hit me. We don’t have a materials problem—we have a knowledge problem. Our infrastructure isn’t falling apart because we lack asphalt — it’s because we’re losing expertise faster than we can replace it. Planning docs are unclear, bids are thin, and projects balloon in cost once shovels hit the ground. 🔥💵 Experience matters: If you increase an engineer’s quality from the 25th to the 75th percentile, that reduces costs by 14% 🔥💵 Retiring workforce: For every 1% of engineers that retire, paving costs rise by several points. DOT workforce has shrunk by 20% is the last 20 years. The trend is scary. 🔥💵 Unclear plans = fewer bidders = higher costs: 1 in 3 resurfacing projects have 1 or 2 bidders. When plans are unclear, contractors see risk and don’t bid. Fewer bidders means less competition, and less competition means higher costs for taxpayers. Read David's full article on Bloomberg here: https://lnkd.in/enbtcAaK
72
11 Comments -
Katja Riefler
AIM Group // Classified… • 18K followers
AIM Group (Marketplaces / Classifieds)'s 2025 Automotive Marketplaces annual report is available now and is the perfect accessory to your favorite fall beverage. Biggest trends include AI (show me an industry that doesn't these days!) EVs, and what marketplaces need to do to protect data from data scraping. Free previews are available: https://hubs.la/Q03KWPX40
5
1 Comment -
Charlie Lambropoulos
Clara Vista Investment… • 10K followers
You can have customers saying nice things and still not have product market fit. Andy Greenfield, partner at TIA Ventures, spent decades doing qualitative research for major CPG brands. He pioneered a methodology to separate polite responses from visceral pain. Getting different audiences together in panels to understand if products were solving real problems. When they'd do these panels, they'd try to get to one specific question: "If this product were taken away tomorrow, would your life be okay or couldn't you live without it?" That's a very different question than "do you like this product?" Jesse Caesar from First Round Capital explains the difference: "If you want to know what your target is doing or how much, go for quantitative research. But if you want to know why they're doing it, or why they believe what they believe, qualitative research gets you that depth of perspective." Most founders confuse customers being polite with customers who actually care. It’s much easier to do that vs facing hard truths sometimes. You ask someone about your product and they'll say "Yeah, this is super useful." But when you dig deeper with the right questions, you realize they don't actually care that much. I can’t overstate the value of qualitative user research whether investing or building a product myself. Talking to 10 customers with very specific questions to gauge how important the problem really is. It’s also very helpful to cross reference this with quantitative metrics with tools like PostHog or Mixpanel. “Trust but verify”. The real magic is when you do both of these things in concert. For example, a client you interview may say “I really love using your feature that lets me do XYZ” and they may be very specific about the value it delivers…so it may seem like a totally credible piece of feedback, but then when you look in PostHog or any user analytics platform, you see that they’ve only used the feature once. So this begs the question “if you find feature XYZ so valuable, why have you only used it once in the past month?” This gap is often the difference between a company that scales and one that plateaus.
20
11 Comments
Explore top content on LinkedIn
Find curated posts and insights for relevant topics all in one place.
View top content