Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

The gut microbiome shapes social behaviour across animal species

Abstract

The gut microbiome has profound influences on brain activity and complex behaviours. Research across diverse animal species, in both natural environments and laboratory settings, has identified biological mechanisms that underlie gut–brain interactions. An emerging central theme is that the gut microbiome is shaped by, and actively contributes to, sociability throughout the lifespan. In this Review, we highlight recent literature revealing the effects of the microbiome on early neurodevelopment, immune modulation, stress responses and microorganism-mediated metabolism that affect social behaviour. Studies investigating the cellular and molecular pathways that underlie microbial influences on social behaviour have implicated brain regions and circuits that mediate critical aspects of animal behaviours, including bonding, mating, defence, aggression and social learning. Gut microbiome–brain research using animal models of social deficits and ecological studies in the wild, as well as investigations of human conditions comorbid with impaired social behaviour, could offer new and natural avenues for improved quality of life in individuals and social groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Mechanisms for gut–brain interactions with consequences on social behaviour.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2: How sociability and gut microorganisms influence each other in freely living animals.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3: Influence of microbiota and metabolites on social behaviours across life stages.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexander, R. D. The evolution of social behavior. Annu. Rev. Ecol. System. 5, 325–383 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Altizer, S. et al. Social organization and parasite risk in mammals: integrating theory and empirical studies. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 517–547 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Krause, J. & Ruxton, G. Living in Groups (Oxford Univ. Press, 2002).

  4. Zhu, P. et al. Correlated evolution of social organization and lifespan in mammals. Nat. Commun. 14, 372 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. The cooperative human. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 427–428 (2018).

  6. Gintis, H. Gene-culture coevolution and the nature of human sociality. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 366, 878–888 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sarkar, A. et al. Microbial transmission in animal social networks and the social microbiome. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1020–1035 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Williams, S. C. P. Gnotobiotics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 1661–1661 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Luczynski, P. et al. Growing up in a bubble: using germ-free animals to assess the influence of the gut microbiota on brain and behavior. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 19, pyw020 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bryda, E. C. The mighty mouse: the impact of rodents on advances in biomedical research. Mol. Med. 110, 207–211 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Robinson, K. J. et al. Social creatures: model animal systems for studying the neuroendocrine mechanisms of social behaviour. J. Neuroendocrinol. 31, e12807 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Silverman, J. L., Yang, M., Lord, C. & Crawley, J. N. Behavioural phenotyping assays for mouse models of autism. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 490–502 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Desbonnet, L., Clarke, G., Shanahan, F., Dinan, T. G. & Cryan, J. F. Microbiota is essential for social development in the mouse. Mol. Psychiatry 19, 146–148 (2014). The first publication demonstrating a role for gut microbiome in modulating social behaviour in mice, demonstrating that germ-free mice display social deficits in the three-chamber sociability test.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Crumeyrolle-Arias, M. et al. Absence of the gut microbiota enhances anxiety-like behavior and neuroendocrine response to acute stress in rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology 42, 207–217 (2014). The first publication demonstrating a role for gut microbiome in modulating social behaviour in rats, finding that germ free rats socialize less and exhibit a pronounced HPA axis-mediated stress response compared with SPF controls.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Arentsen, T., Raith, H., Qian, Y., Forssberg, H. & Diaz Heijtz, R. Host microbiota modulates development of social preference in mice. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 26, 29719 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sharon, G. et al. Commensal bacteria play a role in mating preference of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 20051–20056 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bruckner, J. J. et al. The microbiota promotes social behavior by modulating microglial remodeling of forebrain neurons. PLoS Biol. 20, e3001838 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, X. et al. Effects of β-diketone antibiotic mixtures on behavior of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Chemosphere 144, 2195–2205 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Morais, L. H. et al. Enduring behavioral effects induced by birth by caesarean section in the mouse. Curr. Biol. 30, 3761–3774.e6 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Morel, C., Martinez Sanchez, I., Cherifi, Y., Chartrel, N. & Diaz Heijtz, R. Perturbation of maternal gut microbiota in mice during a critical perinatal window influences early neurobehavioral outcomes in offspring. Neuropharmacology 229, 109479 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lynch, C. M. K. et al. Critical windows of early-life microbiota disruption on behaviour, neuroimmune function, and neurodevelopment. Brain Behav. Immun. 108, 309–327 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vuong, H. E. et al. The maternal microbiome modulates fetal neurodevelopment in mice. Nature 586, 281–286 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Leclercq, S. et al. Low-dose penicillin in early life induces long-term changes in murine gut microbiota, brain cytokines and behavior. Nat. Commun. 8, 15062 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Connor, R. et al. Maternal antibiotic administration during a critical developmental window has enduring neurobehavioural effects in offspring mice. Behav. Brain Res. 404, 113156 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bath, K. G. & Lee, F. S. Variant BDNF (Val66Met) impact on brain structure and function. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 6, 79–85 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nagahara, A. H. et al. Neuroprotective effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in rodent and primate models of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Med. 15, 331–337 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Borrelli, L. et al. Probiotic modulation of the microbiota–gut–brain axis and behaviour in zebrafish. Sci. Rep. 6, 30046 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Luck, B. et al. Bifidobacteria shape host neural circuits during postnatal development by promoting synapse formation and microglial function. Sci. Rep. 10, 7737 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Erny, D. et al. Host microbiota constantly control maturation and function of microglia in the CNS. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 965��977 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Smith, C. J. et al. Microbial modulation via cross-fostering prevents the effects of pervasive environmental stressors on microglia and social behavior, but not the dopamine system. Mol. Psychiatry 28, 2549–2562 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Sudo, N. et al. Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal system for stress response in mice. J. Physiol. 558, 263–275 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Wu, W.-L. et al. Microbiota regulate social behaviour via stress response neurons in the brain. Nature 595, 409–414 (2021). This study determined a mechanistic link between the gut microbiota and social behaviour, showing that absence of a gut microbiome leads to social deficits through hyperactivation of hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing hormone neurons.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. McGaughey, K. D. et al. Relative abundance of Akkermansia spp. and other bacterial phylotypes correlates with anxiety- and depressive-like behavior following social defeat in mice. Sci. Rep. 9, 3281 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Szyszkowicz, J. K., Wong, A., Anisman, H., Merali, Z. & Audet, M.-C. Implications of the gut microbiota in vulnerability to the social avoidance effects of chronic social defeat in male mice. Brain Behav. Immun. 66, 45–55 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yadav, S. K. et al. Repeated social defeat stress induces an inflammatory gut milieu by altering the mucosal barrier integrity and gut microbiota homeostasis. Biol. Psychiatry Glob. Open Sci. 3, 824–836 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Yang, C. et al. Possible role of the gut microbiota–brain axis in the antidepressant effects of (R)-ketamine in a social defeat stress model. Transl. Psychiatry 7, 1294 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Pearson-Leary, J. et al. The gut microbiome regulates the increases in depressive-type behaviors and in inflammatory processes in the ventral hippocampus of stress vulnerable rats. Mol. Psychiatry 25, 1068–1079 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang, C. et al. Bifidobacterium in the gut microbiota confer resilience to chronic social defeat stress in mice. Sci. Rep. 7, 45942 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ritz, N. L. et al. Social anxiety disorder-associated gut microbiota increases social fear. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2308706120 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ritz, N. L. et al. The gut virome is associated with stress-induced changes in behaviour and immune responses in mice. Nat. Microbiol. 9, 359–376 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Mann, E. R., Lam, Y. K. & Uhlig, H. H. Short-chain fatty acids: linking diet, the microbiome and immunity. Nat. Rev. Immun. 24, 577–595 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. van de Wouw, M. et al. Short-chain fatty acids: microbial metabolites that alleviate stress-induced brain–gut axis alterations. J. Physiol. 596, 4923–4944 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Liou, C.-W. et al. Microbial metabolites regulate social novelty via CaMKII neurons in the BNST. Brain Behav. Immun. 113, 104–123 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Szklany, K. et al. Supplementation of dietary non-digestible oligosaccharides from birth onwards improve social and reduce anxiety-like behaviour in male BALB/c mice. Nutr. Neurosci. 23, 896–910 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Jia, Y. et al. Gut microbiome modulates Drosophila aggression through octopamine signaling. Nat. Commun. 12, 2698 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Rohrscheib, C. helsieE. et al. Wolbachia Influences the production of octopamine and affects Drosophila male aggression. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 4573–4580 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. de Crespigny, F. E. C., Pitt, T. D. & Wedell, N. Increased male mating rate in Drosophila is associated with wolbachia infection. J. Evol. Biol. 19, 1964–1972 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Koukou, K. aterina et al. Influence of antibiotic treatment and wolbachia curing on sexual isolation among Drosophila melanogaster cage populations. Evolution 60, 87–96 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Needham, B. D., Kaddurah-Daouk, R. & Mazmanian, S. K. Gut microbial molecules in behavioural and neurodegenerative conditions. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 21, 717–731 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Wittman, T. & Fedorka, K. M. Male mate choice for unparasitized females in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Behav. 28, 37–43 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hurst, J. L. et al. Individual recognition in mice mediated by major urinary proteins. Nature 414, 631–634 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Weger, B. D. et al. The mouse microbiome is required for sex-specific diurnal rhythms of gene expression and metabolism. Cell Metab. 29, 362–382.e8 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kagnoff, M. F. in Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract Vol. 2 (ed. Johnson, L. R.) 1699–1728 (Raven Press, 1987).

  54. Round, J. L. & Mazmanian, S. K. The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immun. 9, 313–323 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Singh, S. et al. Anti-inflammatory Bifidobacterium strains prevent dextran sodium sulfate induced colitis and associated gut microbial dysbiosis in mice. Sci. Rep. 10, 18597 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Han, S.-K. et al. Lactobacillus rhamnosus HDB1258 modulates gut microbiota-mediated immune response in mice with or without lipopolysaccharide-induced systemic inflammation. BMC Microbiol. 21, 146 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Sgritta, M. et al. Mechanisms underlying microbial-mediated changes in social behavior in mouse models of autism spectrum disorder. Neuron 101, 246–259.e6 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Buffington, S. A. et al. Microbial reconstitution reverses maternal diet-induced social and synaptic deficits in offspring. Cell 165, 1762–1775 (2016). Feeding a high fat diet to mouse dams was found to induce social phenotypes and synaptic deficits in offspring, which is mediated by the microbiome and reversed upon treatment with. L. reuteri.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Buffington, S. A. et al. Dissecting the contribution of host genetics and the microbiome in complex behaviors. Cell 184, 1740–1756.e16 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Hsiao, E. Y. et al. Microbiota modulate behavioral and physiological abnormalities associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Cell 155, 1451–1463 (2013). Treatment with. B. fragilis ameliorates social communication deficits in the maternal immune activation model that exhibits ASD-like symptoms.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Brown, D. G. et al. Colitis reduces active social engagement in mice and is ameliorated by supplementation with human microbiota members. Nat. Commun. 15, 2769 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Chen, K. et al. Drosophila histone demethylase KDM5 regulates social behavior through immune control and gut microbiota maintenance. Cell Host Microbe 25, 537–552.e8 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Leonardi, I. et al. Mucosal fungi promote gut barrier function and social behavior via Type 17 immunity. Cell 185, 831–846.e14 (2022). Commensal gut fungi regulate social behavior through Type 17 immune signalling, expanding the known influence of the gut microbiome on social behaviour beyond bacteria.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Filiano, A. J. et al. Unexpected role of interferon-γ in regulating neuronal connectivity and social behaviour. Nature 535, 425–429 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Di Marco Barros, R., Fitzpatrick, Z. & Clatworthy, M. R. The gut–meningeal immune axis: priming brain defense against the most likely invaders. J. Exp. Med. 219, e20211520 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Silverman, J. L. et al. Reconsidering animal models used to study autism spectrum disorder: current state and optimizing future. Genes. Brain Behav. 21, e12803 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Han, V. X., Patel, S., Jones, H. F. & Dale, R. C. Maternal immune activation and neuroinflammation in human neurodevelopmental disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 17, 564–579 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Smith, S. E. P., Li, J., Garbett, K., Mirnics, K. & Patterson, P. H. Maternal immune activation alters fetal brain development through interleukin-6. J. Neurosci. 27, 10695–10702 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Wu, W.-L., Hsiao, E. Y., Yan, Z., Mazmanian, S. K. & Patterson, P. H. The placental interleukin-6 signaling controls fetal brain development and behavior. Brain Behav. Immun. 62, 11–23 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Needham, B. D. et al. A gut-derived metabolite alters brain activity and anxiety behaviour in mice. Nature 602, 647–653 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Choi, G. B. et al. The maternal interleukin-17a pathway in mice promotes autism-like phenotypes in offspring. Science 351, 933–939 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Kim, S. et al. Maternal gut bacteria promote neurodevelopmental abnormalities in mouse offspring. Nature 549, 528–532 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Rivera, H. M., Christiansen, K. J. & Sullivan, E. L. The role of maternal obesity in the risk of neuropsychiatric disorders. Front. Neurosci. 9, 194 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Ceasrine, A. M. et al. Maternal diet disrupts the placenta–brain axis in a sex-specific manner. Nat. Metab. 4, 1732–1745 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Yano, J. M. et al. Indigenous bacteria from the gut microbiota regulate host serotonin biosynthesis. Cell 161, 264–276 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Bellono, N. W. et al. Enterochromaffin cells are gut chemosensors that couple to sensory neural pathways. Cell 170, 185–198.e16 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Liu, X. et al. High-fiber diet mitigates maternal obesity-induced cognitive and social dysfunction in the offspring via gut–brain axis. Cell Metab. 33, 923–938.e6 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Tabouy, L. et al. Dysbiosis of microbiome and probiotic treatment in a genetic model of autism spectrum disorders. Brain Behav. Immun. 73, 310–319 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Osman, A. et al. Acetate supplementation rescues social deficits and alters transcriptional regulation in prefrontal cortex of Shank3 deficient mice. Brain Behav. Immun. 114, 311–324 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Battivelli, D. et al. Induction of territorial dominance and subordination behaviors in laboratory mice. Sci. Rep. 14, 28655 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Raulo, A. et al. Social networks strongly predict the gut microbiota of wild mice. ISME J. 15, 2601–2613 (2021). By combining fine-scale social network data with microbial profiling, the study revealed that patterns of physical association predict microbiota similarity more strongly than genetic relatedness, diet or shared environment in a population of freely living animals.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Antwis, R. E., Lea, J. M. D., Unwin, B. & Shultz, S. Gut microbiome composition is associated with spatial structuring and social interactions in semi-feral welsh mountain ponies. Microbiome 6, 207 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Moeller, A. H. et al. Social behavior shapes the chimpanzee pan-microbiome. Sci. Adv. 2, e1500997 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Tung, J. et al. Social networks predict gut microbiome composition in wild baboons. eLife 4, e05224 (2015). This work offered some of the first direct evidence that social behaviours, such as grooming, structure the gut microbiome in wild primates, combining behavioural observation data with shotgun metagenomic analysis of fecal samples.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Grieneisen, L. E., Livermore, J., Alberts, S., Tung, J. & Archie, E. A. Group living and male dispersal predict the core gut microbiome in wild baboons. Integr. Comp. Biol. 57, 770–785 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Amato, K. R. et al. Patterns in gut microbiota similarity associated with degree of sociality among sex classes of a neotropical primate. Microb. Ecol. 74, 250–258 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Raulo, A. et al. Social behaviour and gut microbiota in red-bellied lemurs (Eulemur rubriventer): in search of the role of immunity in the evolution of sociality. J. Anim. Ecol. 87, 388–399 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Murillo, T., Schneider, D., Heistermann, M., Daniel, R. & Fichtel, C. Assessing the drivers of gut microbiome composition in wild redfronted lemurs via longitudinal metacommunity analysis. Sci. Rep. 12, 21462 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Goodfellow, C. K. et al. Divergence in gut microbial communities mirrors a social group fission event in a black-and-white colobus monkey (Colobus vellerosus). Am. J. Primatol. 81, e22966 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Wikberg, E. C., Christie, D., Sicotte, P. & Ting, N. Interactions between social groups of colobus monkeys (Colobus vellerosus) explain similarities in their gut microbiomes. Anim. Behav. 163, 17–31 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Hou, K. et al. Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 7, 135 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Van Hul, M. et al. What defines a healthy gut microbiome? Gut 73, 1893–1908 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Raulo, A. et al. Social and environmental transmission spread different sets of gut microbes in wild mice. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8, 972–985 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Heitlinger, E., Ferreira, S. C. M., Thierer, D., Hofer, H. & East, M. L. The intestinal eukaryotic and bacterial biome of spotted hyenas: the impact of social status and age on diversity and composition. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 7, 262 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Kwong, W. K. et al. Dynamic microbiome evolution in social bees. Sci. Adv. 3, e1600513 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Koch, H. & Schmid-Hempel, P. Socially transmitted gut microbiota protect bumble bees against an intestinal parasite. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci USA 108, 19288–19292 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Carlini, D. B., Winslow, S. K., Cloppenborg-Schmidt, K. & Baines, J. F. Quantitative microbiome profiling of honey bee (Apis mellifera) guts is predictive of winter colony loss in northern Virginia (USA). Sci. Rep. 14, 11021 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Vanengelsdorp, D. et al. Colony collapse disorder: a descriptive study. PLoS ONE 4, e6481 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Kwong, W. K. & Moran, N. A. Gut microbial communities of social bees. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 374–384 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Vernier, C. L. et al. The gut microbiome defines social group membership in honey bee colonies. Sci. Adv. 6, eabd3431 (2020). Demonstrated that bee colony-specific gut microbial communities produce distinct chemical cues that enable nestmate recognition, and disrupting or exchanging these microbial communities alters social acceptance within colonies.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Teseo, S. et al. The scent of symbiosis: gut bacteria may affect social interactions in leaf-cutting ants. Anim. Behav. 150, 239–254 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Matsuura, K. Nestmate recognition mediated by intestinal bacteria in a termite, Reticulitermes speratus. Oikos 92, 20–26 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Sin, Y. W., Buesching, C. D., Burke, T. & Macdonald, D. W. Molecular characterization of the microbial communities in the subcaudal gland secretion of the European badger (Meles meles). FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 81, 648–659 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Leclaire, S., Jacob, S., Greene, L. K., Dubay, G. R. & Drea, C. M. Social odours covary with bacterial community in the anal secretions of wild meerkats. Sci. Rep. 7, 3240 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Rojas, C. A. et al. Characterization of the microbiome and volatile compounds in anal gland secretions from domestic cats (Felis catus) using metagenomics and metabolomics. Sci. Rep. 13, 19382 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Theis, K. R. et al. Symbiotic bacteria appear to mediate hyena social odors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 19832–19837 (2013). One of the first publications to demonstrate that symbiotic bacteria can mediate social communication in freely living mammals, specifically within scent glands where microorganisms produce volatile compounds that encode social information.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Theis, K. R., Schmidt, T. M. & Holekamp, K. E. Evidence for a bacterial mechanism for group-specific social odors among hyenas. Sci. Rep. 2, 615 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Young, L. J. & Wang, Z. The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 1048–1054 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Donovan, M. et al. Limosilactobacillus reuteri administration alters the gut–brain–behavior axis in a sex-dependent manner in socially monogamous prairie voles. Front. Microbiol. 14, 1015666 (2023). Probiotic administration can modulate social behaviour and neurochemical markers in the highly social and monogamous prairie vole.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Pfau, M. et al. The social microbiome: gut microbiome diversity and abundance are negatively associated with sociality in a wild mammal. R. Soc. Open Sci. 10, 231305 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Liu, J. et al. Gut microbiota reflect the crowding stress of space shortage, physical and non-physical contact in Brandt’s voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii). Microbiol. Res. 255, 126928 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Xu, X. et al. Gut microbiota is associated with aging-related processes of a small mammal species under high-density crowding stress. Adv. Sci. 10, e2205346 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Zhu, Y. et al. Exploration of the muribaculaceae family in the gut microbiota: diversity, metabolism, and function. Nutrients 16, 2660 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Kim, G.-H. & Shim, J.-O. Gut microbiota affects brain development and behavior. Clin. Exp. Pediatr. 66, 274–280 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Kelly, J. R., Minuto, C., Cryan, J. F., Clarke, G. & Dinan, T. G. Cross talk: the microbiota and neurodevelopmental disorders. Front. Neurosci. 11, 490 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Sun, Z. et al. Revealing the importance of prenatal gut microbiome in offspring neurodevelopment in humans. EBioMedicine 90, 104491 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Huang, T. et al. Multi-omics analysis reveals the associations between altered gut microbiota, metabolites, and cytokines during pregnancy. mSystems 9, e0125223 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Goines, P. E. et al. Increased midgestational IFN-γ, IL-4 and IL-5 in women bearing a child with autism: a case-control study. Mol. Autism 2, 13 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Dominguez-Bello, M. G. et al. Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 11971–11975 (2010). The authors sequenced gut microbiomes of newborn babies delivered by caesarean section, finding greater similarity to the maternal skin microbiome and reduced abundance of key beneficial bacteria compared with babies born vaginally.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Shi, X.-Y. et al. Cesarean section due to social factors affects children’s psychology and behavior: a retrospective cohort study. Front. Pediatr. 8, 586957 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Beghetti, I. et al. Early-life gut microbiota and neurodevelopment in preterm infants: any role for Bifidobacterium? Eur. J. Pediatr. 181, 1773–1777 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Ennis, D., Shmorak, S., Jantscher-Krenn, E. & Yassour, M. Longitudinal quantification of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis reveals late colonization in the infant gut independent of maternal milk HMO composition. Nat. Commun. 15, 894 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Wu, H. et al. Longitudinal analyses of infants’ microbiome and metabolome reveal microbes and metabolites with seemingly coordinated dynamics. Commun. Biol. 7, 1506 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Ojima, M. N. et al. Priority effects shape the structure of infant-type Bifidobacterium communities on human milk oligosaccharides. ISME J. 16, 2265–2279 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Moossavi, S. et al. Composition and variation of the human milk microbiota are influenced by maternal and early-life factors. Cell Host Microbe 25, 324–335.e4 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Sordillo, J. E. et al. Association of the infant gut microbiome with early childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes: an ancillary study to the VDAART randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw. Open 2, e190905 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. Adams, J. B., Johansen, L. J., Powell, L. D., Quig, D. & Rubin, R. A. Gastrointestinal flora and gastrointestinal status in children with autism-comparisons to typical children and correlation with autism severity. BMC Gastroenterol. 11, 22 (2011). Through measurement of ASD behavioural scores, gastrointestinal discomfort survey results, microorganism abundance and gut health metrics in the stool, correlations were discovered between severity of gastrointestinal symptoms and behavioural scores, and alterations gut microbiome composition and metabolites in children with ASD to neurotypical control children.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Kang, D.-W. et al. Reduced incidence of Prevotella and other fermenters in intestinal microflora of autistic children. PLoS ONE 8, e68322 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. De Angelis, M. et al. Fecal microbiota and metabolome of children with autism and pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified. PLoS ONE 8, e76993 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Dan, Z. et al. Altered gut microbial profile is associated with abnormal metabolism activity of autism spectrum disorder. Gut Microbes 11, 1246–1267 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. Morton, J. T. et al. Multi-level analysis of the gut–brain axis shows autism spectrum disorder-associated molecular and microbial profiles. Nat. Neurosci. 26, 1208–1217 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. Liu, F. et al. Altered composition and function of intestinal microbiota in autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review. Transl. Psychiatry 9, 43 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. Nirmalkar, K. et al. Bimodal distribution of intestinal Candida in children with autism and its potential link with worse ASD symptoms. Gut Microbes Rep. 1, 2358324 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. Altieri, L. et al. Urinary p-cresol is elevated in small children with severe autism spectrum disorder. Biomarkers 16, 252–260 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Kang, D.-W. et al. Differences in fecal microbial metabolites and microbiota of children with autism spectrum disorders. Anaerobe 49, 121–131 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Needham, B. D. et al. Plasma and fecal metabolite profiles in autism spectrum disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 89, 451–462 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Nirmalkar, K. et al. Reanalysis of metabolomics data reveals that microbiota transfer therapy modulates important fecal and plasma metabolite profiles in children with autism spectrum disorders. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.16.628826 (2024).

  138. Kang, D.-W. et al. Microbiota transfer therapy alters gut ecosystem and improves gastrointestinal and autism symptoms: an open-label study. Microbiome 5, 10 (2017). This study provided the first evidence that modulation of the gut microbiota through microbiota transfer therapy can improve both gastrointestinal and behavioural symptoms in children with ASD, advancing studies from correlational findings.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Kang, D.-W. et al. Long-term benefit of microbiota transfer therapy on autism symptoms and gut microbiota. Sci. Rep. 9, 5821 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. McVey Neufeld, S. F., Ahn, M., Kunze, W. A. & McVey Neufeld, K.-A. Adolescence, the microbiota–gut–brain axis, and the emergence of psychiatric disorders. Biol. Psychiatry 95, 310–318 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Hopkins, M. J., Sharp, R. & Macfarlane, G. T. Age and disease related changes in intestinal bacterial populations assessed by cell culture, 16S rRNA abundance, and community cellular fatty acid profiles. Gut 48, 198–205 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  142. Hollister, E. B. et al. Structure and function of the healthy pre-adolescent pediatric gut microbiome. Microbiome 3, 36 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  143. Agans, R. et al. Distal gut microbiota of adolescent children is different from that of adults. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 77, 404–412 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  144. Claesson, M. J. et al. Composition, variability, and temporal stability of the intestinal microbiota of the elderly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4586–4591 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Odamaki, T. et al. Age-related changes in gut microbiota composition from newborn to centenarian: a cross-sectional study. BMC Microbiol. 16, 90 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  146. Sherwin, E., Bordenstein, S. R., Quinn, J. L., Dinan, T. G. & Cryan, J. F. Microbiota and the social brain. Science 366, eaar2016 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Cheng, Q. et al. Relationship functioning and gut microbiota composition among older adult couples. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 20, 5435 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  148. Beghini, F. et al. Gut microbiome strain-sharing within isolated village social networks. Nature 637, 167–175 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Báez-Mendoza, R., Vázquez, Y., Mastrobattista, E. P. & Williams, Z. M. Neuronal circuits for social decision-making and their clinical implications. Front. Neurosci. 15, 720294 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  150. Falkenstein, M. et al. Impact of the gut microbiome composition on social decision-making. PNAS Nexus 3, pgae166 (2024). Demonstrated that a synbiotic treatment can causally change social decision-making in adult human participants, as well as blood tyrosine levels.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  151. Cryan, J. F. & Dinan, T. G. Mind-altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 701–712 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Flannery, C. et al. Effectiveness of physical activity interventions for overweight and obesity during pregnancy: a systematic review of the content of behaviour change interventions. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 16, 97 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  153. Strandwitz, P. Neurotransmitter modulation by the gut microbiota. Brain Res. 1693, 128–133 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  154. Basiji, K. et al. The critical role of gut–brain axis microbiome in mental disorders. Metab. Brain Dis. 38, 2547–2561 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Lee, S.-H. et al. Emotional well-being and gut microbiome profiles by enterotype. Sci. Rep. 10, 20736 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  156. Valles-Colomer, M. et al. The neuroactive potential of the human gut microbiota in quality of life and depression. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 623–632 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Khavandegar, A. et al. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet can beneficially affect the gut microbiota composition: a systematic review. BMC Med. Genomics 17, 91 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  158. Ghosh, T. S. et al. Mediterranean diet intervention alters the gut microbiome in older people reducing frailty and improving health status: the NU-AGE 1-year dietary intervention across five European countries. Gut 69, 1218–1228 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  159. Hanna, K., Cross, J., Nicholls, A. & Gallegos, D. The association between loneliness or social isolation and food and eating behaviours: a scoping review. Appetite 191, 107051 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Pinto-Sanchez, M. I. et al. Probiotic Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001 reduces depression scores and alters brain activity: a pilot study in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 153, 448–459.e8 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Dill-McFarland, K. A. et al. Close social relationships correlate with human gut microbiota composition. Sci. Rep. 9, 703 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  162. Valles-Colomer, M. et al. The person-to-person transmission landscape of the gut and oral microbiomes. Nature 614, 125–135 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  163. Brito, I. L. et al. Transmission of human-associated microbiota along family and social networks. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 964–971 (2019). Strain-level metagenomics of human microbiome samples in a community indicate that human-associated microorganisms are transmitted across a broad social network.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  164. Ghosh, T. S., Shanahan, F. & O’Toole, P. W. The gut microbiome as a modulator of healthy ageing. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 19, 565–584 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  165. Quan, L. et al. Plasma trimethylamine N-oxide, a gut microbe-generated phosphatidylcholine metabolite, is associated with autism spectrum disorders. Neurotoxicology 76, 93–98 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Mohammadzadeh, R. et al. Age-related dynamics of predominant methanogenic archaea in the human gut microbiome. BMC Microbiol. 25, 193 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  167. Borrel, G. et al. Genomics and metagenomics of trimethylamine-utilizing Archaea in the human gut microbiome. ISME J. 11, 2059–2074 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  168. Nguyen, T. T. et al. Association of loneliness and wisdom with gut microbial diversity and composition: an exploratory study. Front. Psychiatry 12, 648475 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  169. McGuinness, A. J. et al. A systematic review of gut microbiota composition in observational studies of major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Mol. Psychiatry 27, 1920–1935 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  170. Thirion, F. et al. Alteration of gut microbiome in patients with schizophrenia indicates links between bacterial tyrosine biosynthesis and cognitive dysfunction. Biol. Psychiatry Glob. Open Sci. 3, 283–291 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  171. Butler, M. I. et al. The gut microbiome in social anxiety disorder: evidence of altered composition and function. Transl. Psychiatry 13, 95 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  172. Bai, Y. et al. The role of gut microbiota in adolescent depression: Insights from adverse childhood experiences. J. Affect. Disord. 392, 120141 (2026).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. Cheng, Y. et al. Alterations in fecal microbiota composition and cytokine expression profiles in adolescents with depression: a case-control study. Sci. Rep. 15, 12177 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  174. Loughman, A. et al. Gut microbiota composition during infancy and subsequent behavioural outcomes. eBioMedicine 52, 102640 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  175. Nikolova, V. L. et al. Perturbations in gut microbiota composition in psychiatric disorders: a review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 78, 1343–1354 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  176. Kouraki, A. et al. Reproducible microbiome composition signatures of anxiety and depressive symptoms. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 21, 5326–5336 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  177. Li, J. et al. Clostridiales are predominant microbes that mediate psychiatric disorders. J. Psychiatr. Res. 130, 48–56 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  178. Aslam, H. et al. Fiber intake and fiber intervention in depression and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials. Nutr. Rev. 82, 1678–1695 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  179. Doll, J. P. K. et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) as an adjunctive therapy for depression-case report. Front. Psychiatry 13, 815422 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  180. Yang, C. et al. Multi-omics analysis of fecal microbiota transplantation’s impact on functional constipation and comorbid depression and anxiety. BMC Microbiol. 23, 389 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  181. Ait Chait, Y., Mottawea, W., Tompkins, T. A. & Hammami, R. Unravelling the antimicrobial action of antidepressants on gut commensal microbes. Sci. Rep. 10, 17878 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  182. Xu, F., Xie, Q., Kuang, W. & Dong, Z. Interactions between antidepressants and intestinal microbiota. Neurotherapeutics 20, 359–371 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  183. Wang, Y. et al. Multi-omics reveal microbial determinants impacting the treatment outcome of antidepressants in major depressive disorder. Microbiome 11, 195 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  184. Dias, M. F., Nogueira, Y. J. A., Romano-Silva, M. A. & Marques de Miranda, D. Effects of antipsychotics on the gastrointestinal microbiota: a systematic review. Psychiatry Res. 336, 115914 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  185. Doestzada, M. et al. Pharmacomicrobiomics: a novel route towards personalized medicine? Protein Cell 9, 432–445 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  186. Kopachev, N., Netser, S. & Wagner, S. Sex-dependent features of social behavior differ between distinct laboratory mouse strains and their mixed offspring. iScience 25, 103735 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  187. Vogt, C. C. et al. Female behavior drives the formation of distinct social structures in C57BL/6J versus wild-derived outbred mice in field enclosures. BMC Biol. 22, 35 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  188. Lee, N. & Kim, W.-U. Microbiota in T-cell homeostasis and inflammatory diseases. Exp. Mol. Med. 49, e340–e340 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  189. Beura, L. K. et al. Normalizing the environment recapitulates adult human immune traits in laboratory mice. Nature 532, 512–516 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  190. Rosshart, S. P. et al. Laboratory mice born to wild mice have natural microbiota and model human immune responses. Science 365, eaaw4361 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  191. Kaelberer, M. M. et al. A gut–brain neural circuit for nutrient sensory transduction. Science 361, eaat5236 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  192. Han, W. et al. A neural circuit for gut-induced reward. Cell 175, 665–678.e23 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  193. Pavlov, V. A. & Tracey, K. J. The vagus nerve and the inflammatory reflex-linking immunity and metabolism. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 8, 743–754 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  194. Muller, P. A. et al. Microbiota modulate sympathetic neurons via a gut–brain circuit. Nature 583, 441–446 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  195. Ren, W. et al. Sympathetic nerve-enteroendocrine L cell communication modulates GLP-1 release, brain glucose utilization, and cognitive function. Neuron 112, 972–990.e8 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  196. Bayrer, J. R. et al. Gut enterochromaffin cells drive visceral pain and anxiety. Nature 616, 137–142 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  197. Lai, T.-T. et al. The gut microbiota modulate locomotion via vagus-dependent glucagon-like peptide-1 signaling. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 10, 2 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  198. Lai, T.-T., Liou, C.-W., Tsai, Y.-H., Lin, Y.-Y. & Wu, W.-L. Butterflies in the gut: the interplay between intestinal microbiota and stress. J. Biomed. Sci. 30, 92 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  199. Wu, J.-T. et al. Oral short-chain fatty acids administration regulates innate anxiety in adult microbiome-depleted mice. Neuropharmacology 214, 109140 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  200. Anderson, D. J. Circuit modules linking internal states and social behaviour in flies and mice. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 692–704 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  201. Chen, P. & Hong, W. Neural circuit mechanisms of social behavior. Neuron 98, 16–30 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  202. Sokolowski, K. & Corbin, J. G. Wired for behaviors: from development to function of innate limbic system circuitry. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 5, 55 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  203. Gunaydin, L. A. et al. Natural neural projection dynamics underlying social behavior. Cell 157, 1535–1551 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  204. Batten, S. R. et al. Dopamine and serotonin in human substantia nigra track social context and value signals during economic exchange. Nat. Hum. Behav. 8, 718–728 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  205. Liu, Y. et al. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of the first social relationship: a conserved role of 5-HT from mice to monkeys, upstream of oxytocin. Neuron 111, 1468–1485.e7 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  206. Kane, M. J. et al. Mice genetically depleted of brain serotonin display social impairments, communication deficits and repetitive behaviors: possible relevance to autism. PLoS ONE 7, e48975 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  207. Beis, D. et al. Brain serotonin deficiency leads to social communication deficits in mice. Biol. Lett. 11, 20150057 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  208. Rivalan, M. et al. Serotonin drives aggression and social behaviors of laboratory male mice in a semi-natural environment. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 18, 1450540 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  209. MacDonald, K. & MacDonald, T. M. The peptide that binds: a systematic review of oxytocin and its prosocial effects in humans. Harv. Rev. Psychiatry 18, 1–21 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  210. Insel, T. R. A neurobiological basis of social attachment. Am. J. Psychiatry 154, 726–735 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  211. Rich, M. E., deCárdenas, E. J., Lee, H.-J. & Caldwell, H. K. Impairments in the initiation of maternal behavior in oxytocin receptor knockout mice. PLoS ONE 9, e98839 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  212. Winslow, J. T. & Insel, T. R. The social deficits of the oxytocin knockout mouse. Neuropeptides 36, 221–229 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  213. Insel, T. R. & Shapiro, L. E. Oxytocin receptor distribution reflects social organization in monogamous and polygamous voles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 5981–5985 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  214. Grebe, N. M. et al. Neural correlates of mating system diversity: oxytocin and vasopressin receptor distributions in monogamous and non-monogamous Eulemur. Sci. Rep. 11, 3746 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  215. de Jong, T. R. & Neumann, I. D. Oxytocin and aggression. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci. 35, 175–192 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  216. Roelofs, K. et al. Hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis hyperresponsiveness is associated with increased social avoidance behavior in social phobia. Biol. Psychiatry 65, 336–343 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  217. Moreno-Fernández, R. D. et al. Social avoidance and altered hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis in a mouse model of anxious depression: the role of LPA1 receptor. Behav. Brain Res. 455, 114681 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  218. Iob, E., Kirschbaum, C. & Steptoe, A. Positive and negative social support and HPA-axis hyperactivity: evidence from glucocorticoids in human hair. Psychoneuroendocrinology 96, 100–108 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  219. Heck, A. L. et al. Social isolation alters hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis activity after chronic variable stress in male C57BL/6 mice. Stress 23, 457–465 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  220. DeVries, A. C. Interaction among social environment, the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, and behavior. Horm. Behav. 41, 405–413 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  221. Raam, T. & Hong, W. Organization of neural circuits underlying social behavior: a consideration of the medial amygdala. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 68, 124–136 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  222. Lin, D. et al. Functional identification of an aggression locus in the mouse hypothalamus. Nature 470, 221–226 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  223. Falkner, A. L. et al. Hierarchical representations of aggression in a hypothalamic–midbrain circuit. Neuron 106, 637–648.e6 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank members of the Mazmanian laboratory for discussions and critical reading of the manuscript and C. Oikonomou (California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA) for invaluable manuscript editing. The authors acknowledge the supported of L. and B. Fetter, C. Trimble, The Heritage Medical Research Institute, NIH (grant nos. MH100556 and AG063744) (J.A.G. and S.K.M.), Arizona State University (ASU) Biodesign Center for Health Through Microbiomes Start-up (K.N. and R.K.-B.) and National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) Taiwan (grant nos. 113-2628-B-006-013- and 114-2628-B-006-013) (W.-L.W.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to all aspects of the article.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jessica A. Griffiths or Sarkis K. Mazmanian.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

S.K.M. is co-founder of Axial Therapeutics and Nuanced Health, and has equity in Seed Health, Time BioVentures and Intrinsic Medicine. K.N. and R.K.-B. have pending/approved patents for Pitt-Hopkins Syndrome (PTHS) biomarkers and the use of Microbiota Transplant Therapy for various conditions, including PTHS and autism. R.K.-B is a co-founder of Autism Diagnostics LLC and Gut–Brain Axis Therapeutics. There are no conflicts with the current work. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Microbiology thanks Gerard Clarke, Peter Holzer and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Griffiths, J.A., Nirmalkar, K., Wu, WL. et al. The gut microbiome shapes social behaviour across animal species. Nat Rev Microbiol 24, 328–343 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-025-01262-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-025-01262-y

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing