Abstract
The gut microbiome has profound influences on brain activity and complex behaviours. Research across diverse animal species, in both natural environments and laboratory settings, has identified biological mechanisms that underlie gut–brain interactions. An emerging central theme is that the gut microbiome is shaped by, and actively contributes to, sociability throughout the lifespan. In this Review, we highlight recent literature revealing the effects of the microbiome on early neurodevelopment, immune modulation, stress responses and microorganism-mediated metabolism that affect social behaviour. Studies investigating the cellular and molecular pathways that underlie microbial influences on social behaviour have implicated brain regions and circuits that mediate critical aspects of animal behaviours, including bonding, mating, defence, aggression and social learning. Gut microbiome–brain research using animal models of social deficits and ecological studies in the wild, as well as investigations of human conditions comorbid with impaired social behaviour, could offer new and natural avenues for improved quality of life in individuals and social groups.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout



Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, R. D. The evolution of social behavior. Annu. Rev. Ecol. System. 5, 325–383 (1974).
Altizer, S. et al. Social organization and parasite risk in mammals: integrating theory and empirical studies. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 517–547 (2003).
Krause, J. & Ruxton, G. Living in Groups (Oxford Univ. Press, 2002).
Zhu, P. et al. Correlated evolution of social organization and lifespan in mammals. Nat. Commun. 14, 372 (2023).
The cooperative human. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 427–428 (2018).
Gintis, H. Gene-culture coevolution and the nature of human sociality. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 366, 878–888 (2011).
Sarkar, A. et al. Microbial transmission in animal social networks and the social microbiome. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1020–1035 (2020).
Williams, S. C. P. Gnotobiotics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 1661–1661 (2014).
Luczynski, P. et al. Growing up in a bubble: using germ-free animals to assess the influence of the gut microbiota on brain and behavior. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 19, pyw020 (2016).
Bryda, E. C. The mighty mouse: the impact of rodents on advances in biomedical research. Mol. Med. 110, 207–211 (2013).
Robinson, K. J. et al. Social creatures: model animal systems for studying the neuroendocrine mechanisms of social behaviour. J. Neuroendocrinol. 31, e12807 (2019).
Silverman, J. L., Yang, M., Lord, C. & Crawley, J. N. Behavioural phenotyping assays for mouse models of autism. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 490–502 (2010).
Desbonnet, L., Clarke, G., Shanahan, F., Dinan, T. G. & Cryan, J. F. Microbiota is essential for social development in the mouse. Mol. Psychiatry 19, 146–148 (2014). The first publication demonstrating a role for gut microbiome in modulating social behaviour in mice, demonstrating that germ-free mice display social deficits in the three-chamber sociability test.
Crumeyrolle-Arias, M. et al. Absence of the gut microbiota enhances anxiety-like behavior and neuroendocrine response to acute stress in rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology 42, 207–217 (2014). The first publication demonstrating a role for gut microbiome in modulating social behaviour in rats, finding that germ free rats socialize less and exhibit a pronounced HPA axis-mediated stress response compared with SPF controls.
Arentsen, T., Raith, H., Qian, Y., Forssberg, H. & Diaz Heijtz, R. Host microbiota modulates development of social preference in mice. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 26, 29719 (2015).
Sharon, G. et al. Commensal bacteria play a role in mating preference of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 20051–20056 (2010).
Bruckner, J. J. et al. The microbiota promotes social behavior by modulating microglial remodeling of forebrain neurons. PLoS Biol. 20, e3001838 (2022).
Wang, X. et al. Effects of β-diketone antibiotic mixtures on behavior of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Chemosphere 144, 2195–2205 (2016).
Morais, L. H. et al. Enduring behavioral effects induced by birth by caesarean section in the mouse. Curr. Biol. 30, 3761–3774.e6 (2020).
Morel, C., Martinez Sanchez, I., Cherifi, Y., Chartrel, N. & Diaz Heijtz, R. Perturbation of maternal gut microbiota in mice during a critical perinatal window influences early neurobehavioral outcomes in offspring. Neuropharmacology 229, 109479 (2023).
Lynch, C. M. K. et al. Critical windows of early-life microbiota disruption on behaviour, neuroimmune function, and neurodevelopment. Brain Behav. Immun. 108, 309–327 (2023).
Vuong, H. E. et al. The maternal microbiome modulates fetal neurodevelopment in mice. Nature 586, 281–286 (2020).
Leclercq, S. et al. Low-dose penicillin in early life induces long-term changes in murine gut microbiota, brain cytokines and behavior. Nat. Commun. 8, 15062 (2017).
O’Connor, R. et al. Maternal antibiotic administration during a critical developmental window has enduring neurobehavioural effects in offspring mice. Behav. Brain Res. 404, 113156 (2021).
Bath, K. G. & Lee, F. S. Variant BDNF (Val66Met) impact on brain structure and function. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 6, 79–85 (2006).
Nagahara, A. H. et al. Neuroprotective effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in rodent and primate models of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Med. 15, 331–337 (2009).
Borrelli, L. et al. Probiotic modulation of the microbiota–gut–brain axis and behaviour in zebrafish. Sci. Rep. 6, 30046 (2016).
Luck, B. et al. Bifidobacteria shape host neural circuits during postnatal development by promoting synapse formation and microglial function. Sci. Rep. 10, 7737 (2020).
Erny, D. et al. Host microbiota constantly control maturation and function of microglia in the CNS. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 965��977 (2015).
Smith, C. J. et al. Microbial modulation via cross-fostering prevents the effects of pervasive environmental stressors on microglia and social behavior, but not the dopamine system. Mol. Psychiatry 28, 2549–2562 (2023).
Sudo, N. et al. Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal system for stress response in mice. J. Physiol. 558, 263–275 (2004).
Wu, W.-L. et al. Microbiota regulate social behaviour via stress response neurons in the brain. Nature 595, 409–414 (2021). This study determined a mechanistic link between the gut microbiota and social behaviour, showing that absence of a gut microbiome leads to social deficits through hyperactivation of hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing hormone neurons.
McGaughey, K. D. et al. Relative abundance of Akkermansia spp. and other bacterial phylotypes correlates with anxiety- and depressive-like behavior following social defeat in mice. Sci. Rep. 9, 3281 (2019).
Szyszkowicz, J. K., Wong, A., Anisman, H., Merali, Z. & Audet, M.-C. Implications of the gut microbiota in vulnerability to the social avoidance effects of chronic social defeat in male mice. Brain Behav. Immun. 66, 45–55 (2017).
Yadav, S. K. et al. Repeated social defeat stress induces an inflammatory gut milieu by altering the mucosal barrier integrity and gut microbiota homeostasis. Biol. Psychiatry Glob. Open Sci. 3, 824–836 (2023).
Yang, C. et al. Possible role of the gut microbiota–brain axis in the antidepressant effects of (R)-ketamine in a social defeat stress model. Transl. Psychiatry 7, 1294 (2017).
Pearson-Leary, J. et al. The gut microbiome regulates the increases in depressive-type behaviors and in inflammatory processes in the ventral hippocampus of stress vulnerable rats. Mol. Psychiatry 25, 1068–1079 (2020).
Yang, C. et al. Bifidobacterium in the gut microbiota confer resilience to chronic social defeat stress in mice. Sci. Rep. 7, 45942 (2017).
Ritz, N. L. et al. Social anxiety disorder-associated gut microbiota increases social fear. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2308706120 (2024).
Ritz, N. L. et al. The gut virome is associated with stress-induced changes in behaviour and immune responses in mice. Nat. Microbiol. 9, 359–376 (2024).
Mann, E. R., Lam, Y. K. & Uhlig, H. H. Short-chain fatty acids: linking diet, the microbiome and immunity. Nat. Rev. Immun. 24, 577–595 (2024).
van de Wouw, M. et al. Short-chain fatty acids: microbial metabolites that alleviate stress-induced brain–gut axis alterations. J. Physiol. 596, 4923–4944 (2018).
Liou, C.-W. et al. Microbial metabolites regulate social novelty via CaMKII neurons in the BNST. Brain Behav. Immun. 113, 104–123 (2023).
Szklany, K. et al. Supplementation of dietary non-digestible oligosaccharides from birth onwards improve social and reduce anxiety-like behaviour in male BALB/c mice. Nutr. Neurosci. 23, 896–910 (2020).
Jia, Y. et al. Gut microbiome modulates Drosophila aggression through octopamine signaling. Nat. Commun. 12, 2698 (2021).
Rohrscheib, C. helsieE. et al. Wolbachia Influences the production of octopamine and affects Drosophila male aggression. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 4573–4580 (2015).
de Crespigny, F. E. C., Pitt, T. D. & Wedell, N. Increased male mating rate in Drosophila is associated with wolbachia infection. J. Evol. Biol. 19, 1964–1972 (2006).
Koukou, K. aterina et al. Influence of antibiotic treatment and wolbachia curing on sexual isolation among Drosophila melanogaster cage populations. Evolution 60, 87–96 (2006).
Needham, B. D., Kaddurah-Daouk, R. & Mazmanian, S. K. Gut microbial molecules in behavioural and neurodegenerative conditions. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 21, 717–731 (2020).
Wittman, T. & Fedorka, K. M. Male mate choice for unparasitized females in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Behav. 28, 37–43 (2015).
Hurst, J. L. et al. Individual recognition in mice mediated by major urinary proteins. Nature 414, 631–634 (2001).
Weger, B. D. et al. The mouse microbiome is required for sex-specific diurnal rhythms of gene expression and metabolism. Cell Metab. 29, 362–382.e8 (2019).
Kagnoff, M. F. in Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract Vol. 2 (ed. Johnson, L. R.) 1699–1728 (Raven Press, 1987).
Round, J. L. & Mazmanian, S. K. The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immun. 9, 313–323 (2009).
Singh, S. et al. Anti-inflammatory Bifidobacterium strains prevent dextran sodium sulfate induced colitis and associated gut microbial dysbiosis in mice. Sci. Rep. 10, 18597 (2020).
Han, S.-K. et al. Lactobacillus rhamnosus HDB1258 modulates gut microbiota-mediated immune response in mice with or without lipopolysaccharide-induced systemic inflammation. BMC Microbiol. 21, 146 (2021).
Sgritta, M. et al. Mechanisms underlying microbial-mediated changes in social behavior in mouse models of autism spectrum disorder. Neuron 101, 246–259.e6 (2019).
Buffington, S. A. et al. Microbial reconstitution reverses maternal diet-induced social and synaptic deficits in offspring. Cell 165, 1762–1775 (2016). Feeding a high fat diet to mouse dams was found to induce social phenotypes and synaptic deficits in offspring, which is mediated by the microbiome and reversed upon treatment with. L. reuteri.
Buffington, S. A. et al. Dissecting the contribution of host genetics and the microbiome in complex behaviors. Cell 184, 1740–1756.e16 (2021).
Hsiao, E. Y. et al. Microbiota modulate behavioral and physiological abnormalities associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Cell 155, 1451–1463 (2013). Treatment with. B. fragilis ameliorates social communication deficits in the maternal immune activation model that exhibits ASD-like symptoms.
Brown, D. G. et al. Colitis reduces active social engagement in mice and is ameliorated by supplementation with human microbiota members. Nat. Commun. 15, 2769 (2024).
Chen, K. et al. Drosophila histone demethylase KDM5 regulates social behavior through immune control and gut microbiota maintenance. Cell Host Microbe 25, 537–552.e8 (2019).
Leonardi, I. et al. Mucosal fungi promote gut barrier function and social behavior via Type 17 immunity. Cell 185, 831–846.e14 (2022). Commensal gut fungi regulate social behavior through Type 17 immune signalling, expanding the known influence of the gut microbiome on social behaviour beyond bacteria.
Filiano, A. J. et al. Unexpected role of interferon-γ in regulating neuronal connectivity and social behaviour. Nature 535, 425–429 (2016).
Di Marco Barros, R., Fitzpatrick, Z. & Clatworthy, M. R. The gut–meningeal immune axis: priming brain defense against the most likely invaders. J. Exp. Med. 219, e20211520 (2022).
Silverman, J. L. et al. Reconsidering animal models used to study autism spectrum disorder: current state and optimizing future. Genes. Brain Behav. 21, e12803 (2022).
Han, V. X., Patel, S., Jones, H. F. & Dale, R. C. Maternal immune activation and neuroinflammation in human neurodevelopmental disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 17, 564–579 (2021).
Smith, S. E. P., Li, J., Garbett, K., Mirnics, K. & Patterson, P. H. Maternal immune activation alters fetal brain development through interleukin-6. J. Neurosci. 27, 10695–10702 (2007).
Wu, W.-L., Hsiao, E. Y., Yan, Z., Mazmanian, S. K. & Patterson, P. H. The placental interleukin-6 signaling controls fetal brain development and behavior. Brain Behav. Immun. 62, 11–23 (2017).
Needham, B. D. et al. A gut-derived metabolite alters brain activity and anxiety behaviour in mice. Nature 602, 647–653 (2022).
Choi, G. B. et al. The maternal interleukin-17a pathway in mice promotes autism-like phenotypes in offspring. Science 351, 933–939 (2016).
Kim, S. et al. Maternal gut bacteria promote neurodevelopmental abnormalities in mouse offspring. Nature 549, 528–532 (2017).
Rivera, H. M., Christiansen, K. J. & Sullivan, E. L. The role of maternal obesity in the risk of neuropsychiatric disorders. Front. Neurosci. 9, 194 (2015).
Ceasrine, A. M. et al. Maternal diet disrupts the placenta–brain axis in a sex-specific manner. Nat. Metab. 4, 1732–1745 (2022).
Yano, J. M. et al. Indigenous bacteria from the gut microbiota regulate host serotonin biosynthesis. Cell 161, 264–276 (2015).
Bellono, N. W. et al. Enterochromaffin cells are gut chemosensors that couple to sensory neural pathways. Cell 170, 185–198.e16 (2017).
Liu, X. et al. High-fiber diet mitigates maternal obesity-induced cognitive and social dysfunction in the offspring via gut–brain axis. Cell Metab. 33, 923–938.e6 (2021).
Tabouy, L. et al. Dysbiosis of microbiome and probiotic treatment in a genetic model of autism spectrum disorders. Brain Behav. Immun. 73, 310–319 (2018).
Osman, A. et al. Acetate supplementation rescues social deficits and alters transcriptional regulation in prefrontal cortex of Shank3 deficient mice. Brain Behav. Immun. 114, 311–324 (2023).
Battivelli, D. et al. Induction of territorial dominance and subordination behaviors in laboratory mice. Sci. Rep. 14, 28655 (2024).
Raulo, A. et al. Social networks strongly predict the gut microbiota of wild mice. ISME J. 15, 2601–2613 (2021). By combining fine-scale social network data with microbial profiling, the study revealed that patterns of physical association predict microbiota similarity more strongly than genetic relatedness, diet or shared environment in a population of freely living animals.
Antwis, R. E., Lea, J. M. D., Unwin, B. & Shultz, S. Gut microbiome composition is associated with spatial structuring and social interactions in semi-feral welsh mountain ponies. Microbiome 6, 207 (2018).
Moeller, A. H. et al. Social behavior shapes the chimpanzee pan-microbiome. Sci. Adv. 2, e1500997 (2016).
Tung, J. et al. Social networks predict gut microbiome composition in wild baboons. eLife 4, e05224 (2015). This work offered some of the first direct evidence that social behaviours, such as grooming, structure the gut microbiome in wild primates, combining behavioural observation data with shotgun metagenomic analysis of fecal samples.
Grieneisen, L. E., Livermore, J., Alberts, S., Tung, J. & Archie, E. A. Group living and male dispersal predict the core gut microbiome in wild baboons. Integr. Comp. Biol. 57, 770–785 (2017).
Amato, K. R. et al. Patterns in gut microbiota similarity associated with degree of sociality among sex classes of a neotropical primate. Microb. Ecol. 74, 250–258 (2017).
Raulo, A. et al. Social behaviour and gut microbiota in red-bellied lemurs (Eulemur rubriventer): in search of the role of immunity in the evolution of sociality. J. Anim. Ecol. 87, 388–399 (2018).
Murillo, T., Schneider, D., Heistermann, M., Daniel, R. & Fichtel, C. Assessing the drivers of gut microbiome composition in wild redfronted lemurs via longitudinal metacommunity analysis. Sci. Rep. 12, 21462 (2022).
Goodfellow, C. K. et al. Divergence in gut microbial communities mirrors a social group fission event in a black-and-white colobus monkey (Colobus vellerosus). Am. J. Primatol. 81, e22966 (2019).
Wikberg, E. C., Christie, D., Sicotte, P. & Ting, N. Interactions between social groups of colobus monkeys (Colobus vellerosus) explain similarities in their gut microbiomes. Anim. Behav. 163, 17–31 (2020).
Hou, K. et al. Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 7, 135 (2022).
Van Hul, M. et al. What defines a healthy gut microbiome? Gut 73, 1893–1908 (2024).
Raulo, A. et al. Social and environmental transmission spread different sets of gut microbes in wild mice. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8, 972–985 (2024).
Heitlinger, E., Ferreira, S. C. M., Thierer, D., Hofer, H. & East, M. L. The intestinal eukaryotic and bacterial biome of spotted hyenas: the impact of social status and age on diversity and composition. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 7, 262 (2017).
Kwong, W. K. et al. Dynamic microbiome evolution in social bees. Sci. Adv. 3, e1600513 (2017).
Koch, H. & Schmid-Hempel, P. Socially transmitted gut microbiota protect bumble bees against an intestinal parasite. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci USA 108, 19288–19292 (2011).
Carlini, D. B., Winslow, S. K., Cloppenborg-Schmidt, K. & Baines, J. F. Quantitative microbiome profiling of honey bee (Apis mellifera) guts is predictive of winter colony loss in northern Virginia (USA). Sci. Rep. 14, 11021 (2024).
Vanengelsdorp, D. et al. Colony collapse disorder: a descriptive study. PLoS ONE 4, e6481 (2009).
Kwong, W. K. & Moran, N. A. Gut microbial communities of social bees. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 374–384 (2016).
Vernier, C. L. et al. The gut microbiome defines social group membership in honey bee colonies. Sci. Adv. 6, eabd3431 (2020). Demonstrated that bee colony-specific gut microbial communities produce distinct chemical cues that enable nestmate recognition, and disrupting or exchanging these microbial communities alters social acceptance within colonies.
Teseo, S. et al. The scent of symbiosis: gut bacteria may affect social interactions in leaf-cutting ants. Anim. Behav. 150, 239–254 (2019).
Matsuura, K. Nestmate recognition mediated by intestinal bacteria in a termite, Reticulitermes speratus. Oikos 92, 20–26 (2001).
Sin, Y. W., Buesching, C. D., Burke, T. & Macdonald, D. W. Molecular characterization of the microbial communities in the subcaudal gland secretion of the European badger (Meles meles). FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 81, 648–659 (2012).
Leclaire, S., Jacob, S., Greene, L. K., Dubay, G. R. & Drea, C. M. Social odours covary with bacterial community in the anal secretions of wild meerkats. Sci. Rep. 7, 3240 (2017).
Rojas, C. A. et al. Characterization of the microbiome and volatile compounds in anal gland secretions from domestic cats (Felis catus) using metagenomics and metabolomics. Sci. Rep. 13, 19382 (2023).
Theis, K. R. et al. Symbiotic bacteria appear to mediate hyena social odors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 19832–19837 (2013). One of the first publications to demonstrate that symbiotic bacteria can mediate social communication in freely living mammals, specifically within scent glands where microorganisms produce volatile compounds that encode social information.
Theis, K. R., Schmidt, T. M. & Holekamp, K. E. Evidence for a bacterial mechanism for group-specific social odors among hyenas. Sci. Rep. 2, 615 (2012).
Young, L. J. & Wang, Z. The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 1048–1054 (2004).
Donovan, M. et al. Limosilactobacillus reuteri administration alters the gut–brain–behavior axis in a sex-dependent manner in socially monogamous prairie voles. Front. Microbiol. 14, 1015666 (2023). Probiotic administration can modulate social behaviour and neurochemical markers in the highly social and monogamous prairie vole.
Pfau, M. et al. The social microbiome: gut microbiome diversity and abundance are negatively associated with sociality in a wild mammal. R. Soc. Open Sci. 10, 231305 (2023).
Liu, J. et al. Gut microbiota reflect the crowding stress of space shortage, physical and non-physical contact in Brandt’s voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii). Microbiol. Res. 255, 126928 (2021).
Xu, X. et al. Gut microbiota is associated with aging-related processes of a small mammal species under high-density crowding stress. Adv. Sci. 10, e2205346 (2023).
Zhu, Y. et al. Exploration of the muribaculaceae family in the gut microbiota: diversity, metabolism, and function. Nutrients 16, 2660 (2024).
Kim, G.-H. & Shim, J.-O. Gut microbiota affects brain development and behavior. Clin. Exp. Pediatr. 66, 274–280 (2023).
Kelly, J. R., Minuto, C., Cryan, J. F., Clarke, G. & Dinan, T. G. Cross talk: the microbiota and neurodevelopmental disorders. Front. Neurosci. 11, 490 (2017).
Sun, Z. et al. Revealing the importance of prenatal gut microbiome in offspring neurodevelopment in humans. EBioMedicine 90, 104491 (2023).
Huang, T. et al. Multi-omics analysis reveals the associations between altered gut microbiota, metabolites, and cytokines during pregnancy. mSystems 9, e0125223 (2024).
Goines, P. E. et al. Increased midgestational IFN-γ, IL-4 and IL-5 in women bearing a child with autism: a case-control study. Mol. Autism 2, 13 (2011).
Dominguez-Bello, M. G. et al. Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 11971–11975 (2010). The authors sequenced gut microbiomes of newborn babies delivered by caesarean section, finding greater similarity to the maternal skin microbiome and reduced abundance of key beneficial bacteria compared with babies born vaginally.
Shi, X.-Y. et al. Cesarean section due to social factors affects children’s psychology and behavior: a retrospective cohort study. Front. Pediatr. 8, 586957 (2020).
Beghetti, I. et al. Early-life gut microbiota and neurodevelopment in preterm infants: any role for Bifidobacterium? Eur. J. Pediatr. 181, 1773–1777 (2022).
Ennis, D., Shmorak, S., Jantscher-Krenn, E. & Yassour, M. Longitudinal quantification of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis reveals late colonization in the infant gut independent of maternal milk HMO composition. Nat. Commun. 15, 894 (2024).
Wu, H. et al. Longitudinal analyses of infants’ microbiome and metabolome reveal microbes and metabolites with seemingly coordinated dynamics. Commun. Biol. 7, 1506 (2024).
Ojima, M. N. et al. Priority effects shape the structure of infant-type Bifidobacterium communities on human milk oligosaccharides. ISME J. 16, 2265–2279 (2022).
Moossavi, S. et al. Composition and variation of the human milk microbiota are influenced by maternal and early-life factors. Cell Host Microbe 25, 324–335.e4 (2019).
Sordillo, J. E. et al. Association of the infant gut microbiome with early childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes: an ancillary study to the VDAART randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw. Open 2, e190905 (2019).
Adams, J. B., Johansen, L. J., Powell, L. D., Quig, D. & Rubin, R. A. Gastrointestinal flora and gastrointestinal status in children with autism-comparisons to typical children and correlation with autism severity. BMC Gastroenterol. 11, 22 (2011). Through measurement of ASD behavioural scores, gastrointestinal discomfort survey results, microorganism abundance and gut health metrics in the stool, correlations were discovered between severity of gastrointestinal symptoms and behavioural scores, and alterations gut microbiome composition and metabolites in children with ASD to neurotypical control children.
Kang, D.-W. et al. Reduced incidence of Prevotella and other fermenters in intestinal microflora of autistic children. PLoS ONE 8, e68322 (2013).
De Angelis, M. et al. Fecal microbiota and metabolome of children with autism and pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified. PLoS ONE 8, e76993 (2013).
Dan, Z. et al. Altered gut microbial profile is associated with abnormal metabolism activity of autism spectrum disorder. Gut Microbes 11, 1246–1267 (2020).
Morton, J. T. et al. Multi-level analysis of the gut–brain axis shows autism spectrum disorder-associated molecular and microbial profiles. Nat. Neurosci. 26, 1208–1217 (2023).
Liu, F. et al. Altered composition and function of intestinal microbiota in autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review. Transl. Psychiatry 9, 43 (2019).
Nirmalkar, K. et al. Bimodal distribution of intestinal Candida in children with autism and its potential link with worse ASD symptoms. Gut Microbes Rep. 1, 2358324 (2024).
Altieri, L. et al. Urinary p-cresol is elevated in small children with severe autism spectrum disorder. Biomarkers 16, 252–260 (2011).
Kang, D.-W. et al. Differences in fecal microbial metabolites and microbiota of children with autism spectrum disorders. Anaerobe 49, 121–131 (2018).
Needham, B. D. et al. Plasma and fecal metabolite profiles in autism spectrum disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 89, 451–462 (2021).
Nirmalkar, K. et al. Reanalysis of metabolomics data reveals that microbiota transfer therapy modulates important fecal and plasma metabolite profiles in children with autism spectrum disorders. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.16.628826 (2024).
Kang, D.-W. et al. Microbiota transfer therapy alters gut ecosystem and improves gastrointestinal and autism symptoms: an open-label study. Microbiome 5, 10 (2017). This study provided the first evidence that modulation of the gut microbiota through microbiota transfer therapy can improve both gastrointestinal and behavioural symptoms in children with ASD, advancing studies from correlational findings.
Kang, D.-W. et al. Long-term benefit of microbiota transfer therapy on autism symptoms and gut microbiota. Sci. Rep. 9, 5821 (2019).
McVey Neufeld, S. F., Ahn, M., Kunze, W. A. & McVey Neufeld, K.-A. Adolescence, the microbiota–gut–brain axis, and the emergence of psychiatric disorders. Biol. Psychiatry 95, 310–318 (2024).
Hopkins, M. J., Sharp, R. & Macfarlane, G. T. Age and disease related changes in intestinal bacterial populations assessed by cell culture, 16S rRNA abundance, and community cellular fatty acid profiles. Gut 48, 198–205 (2001).
Hollister, E. B. et al. Structure and function of the healthy pre-adolescent pediatric gut microbiome. Microbiome 3, 36 (2015).
Agans, R. et al. Distal gut microbiota of adolescent children is different from that of adults. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 77, 404–412 (2011).
Claesson, M. J. et al. Composition, variability, and temporal stability of the intestinal microbiota of the elderly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4586–4591 (2011).
Odamaki, T. et al. Age-related changes in gut microbiota composition from newborn to centenarian: a cross-sectional study. BMC Microbiol. 16, 90 (2016).
Sherwin, E., Bordenstein, S. R., Quinn, J. L., Dinan, T. G. & Cryan, J. F. Microbiota and the social brain. Science 366, eaar2016 (2019).
Cheng, Q. et al. Relationship functioning and gut microbiota composition among older adult couples. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 20, 5435 (2023).
Beghini, F. et al. Gut microbiome strain-sharing within isolated village social networks. Nature 637, 167–175 (2025).
Báez-Mendoza, R., Vázquez, Y., Mastrobattista, E. P. & Williams, Z. M. Neuronal circuits for social decision-making and their clinical implications. Front. Neurosci. 15, 720294 (2021).
Falkenstein, M. et al. Impact of the gut microbiome composition on social decision-making. PNAS Nexus 3, pgae166 (2024). Demonstrated that a synbiotic treatment can causally change social decision-making in adult human participants, as well as blood tyrosine levels.
Cryan, J. F. & Dinan, T. G. Mind-altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 701–712 (2012).
Flannery, C. et al. Effectiveness of physical activity interventions for overweight and obesity during pregnancy: a systematic review of the content of behaviour change interventions. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 16, 97 (2019).
Strandwitz, P. Neurotransmitter modulation by the gut microbiota. Brain Res. 1693, 128–133 (2018).
Basiji, K. et al. The critical role of gut–brain axis microbiome in mental disorders. Metab. Brain Dis. 38, 2547–2561 (2023).
Lee, S.-H. et al. Emotional well-being and gut microbiome profiles by enterotype. Sci. Rep. 10, 20736 (2020).
Valles-Colomer, M. et al. The neuroactive potential of the human gut microbiota in quality of life and depression. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 623–632 (2019).
Khavandegar, A. et al. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet can beneficially affect the gut microbiota composition: a systematic review. BMC Med. Genomics 17, 91 (2024).
Ghosh, T. S. et al. Mediterranean diet intervention alters the gut microbiome in older people reducing frailty and improving health status: the NU-AGE 1-year dietary intervention across five European countries. Gut 69, 1218–1228 (2020).
Hanna, K., Cross, J., Nicholls, A. & Gallegos, D. The association between loneliness or social isolation and food and eating behaviours: a scoping review. Appetite 191, 107051 (2023).
Pinto-Sanchez, M. I. et al. Probiotic Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001 reduces depression scores and alters brain activity: a pilot study in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 153, 448–459.e8 (2017).
Dill-McFarland, K. A. et al. Close social relationships correlate with human gut microbiota composition. Sci. Rep. 9, 703 (2019).
Valles-Colomer, M. et al. The person-to-person transmission landscape of the gut and oral microbiomes. Nature 614, 125–135 (2023).
Brito, I. L. et al. Transmission of human-associated microbiota along family and social networks. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 964–971 (2019). Strain-level metagenomics of human microbiome samples in a community indicate that human-associated microorganisms are transmitted across a broad social network.
Ghosh, T. S., Shanahan, F. & O’Toole, P. W. The gut microbiome as a modulator of healthy ageing. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 19, 565–584 (2022).
Quan, L. et al. Plasma trimethylamine N-oxide, a gut microbe-generated phosphatidylcholine metabolite, is associated with autism spectrum disorders. Neurotoxicology 76, 93–98 (2020).
Mohammadzadeh, R. et al. Age-related dynamics of predominant methanogenic archaea in the human gut microbiome. BMC Microbiol. 25, 193 (2025).
Borrel, G. et al. Genomics and metagenomics of trimethylamine-utilizing Archaea in the human gut microbiome. ISME J. 11, 2059–2074 (2017).
Nguyen, T. T. et al. Association of loneliness and wisdom with gut microbial diversity and composition: an exploratory study. Front. Psychiatry 12, 648475 (2021).
McGuinness, A. J. et al. A systematic review of gut microbiota composition in observational studies of major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Mol. Psychiatry 27, 1920–1935 (2022).
Thirion, F. et al. Alteration of gut microbiome in patients with schizophrenia indicates links between bacterial tyrosine biosynthesis and cognitive dysfunction. Biol. Psychiatry Glob. Open Sci. 3, 283–291 (2023).
Butler, M. I. et al. The gut microbiome in social anxiety disorder: evidence of altered composition and function. Transl. Psychiatry 13, 95 (2023).
Bai, Y. et al. The role of gut microbiota in adolescent depression: Insights from adverse childhood experiences. J. Affect. Disord. 392, 120141 (2026).
Cheng, Y. et al. Alterations in fecal microbiota composition and cytokine expression profiles in adolescents with depression: a case-control study. Sci. Rep. 15, 12177 (2025).
Loughman, A. et al. Gut microbiota composition during infancy and subsequent behavioural outcomes. eBioMedicine 52, 102640 (2020).
Nikolova, V. L. et al. Perturbations in gut microbiota composition in psychiatric disorders: a review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 78, 1343–1354 (2021).
Kouraki, A. et al. Reproducible microbiome composition signatures of anxiety and depressive symptoms. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 21, 5326–5336 (2023).
Li, J. et al. Clostridiales are predominant microbes that mediate psychiatric disorders. J. Psychiatr. Res. 130, 48–56 (2020).
Aslam, H. et al. Fiber intake and fiber intervention in depression and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials. Nutr. Rev. 82, 1678–1695 (2024).
Doll, J. P. K. et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) as an adjunctive therapy for depression-case report. Front. Psychiatry 13, 815422 (2022).
Yang, C. et al. Multi-omics analysis of fecal microbiota transplantation’s impact on functional constipation and comorbid depression and anxiety. BMC Microbiol. 23, 389 (2023).
Ait Chait, Y., Mottawea, W., Tompkins, T. A. & Hammami, R. Unravelling the antimicrobial action of antidepressants on gut commensal microbes. Sci. Rep. 10, 17878 (2020).
Xu, F., Xie, Q., Kuang, W. & Dong, Z. Interactions between antidepressants and intestinal microbiota. Neurotherapeutics 20, 359–371 (2023).
Wang, Y. et al. Multi-omics reveal microbial determinants impacting the treatment outcome of antidepressants in major depressive disorder. Microbiome 11, 195 (2023).
Dias, M. F., Nogueira, Y. J. A., Romano-Silva, M. A. & Marques de Miranda, D. Effects of antipsychotics on the gastrointestinal microbiota: a systematic review. Psychiatry Res. 336, 115914 (2024).
Doestzada, M. et al. Pharmacomicrobiomics: a novel route towards personalized medicine? Protein Cell 9, 432–445 (2018).
Kopachev, N., Netser, S. & Wagner, S. Sex-dependent features of social behavior differ between distinct laboratory mouse strains and their mixed offspring. iScience 25, 103735 (2022).
Vogt, C. C. et al. Female behavior drives the formation of distinct social structures in C57BL/6J versus wild-derived outbred mice in field enclosures. BMC Biol. 22, 35 (2024).
Lee, N. & Kim, W.-U. Microbiota in T-cell homeostasis and inflammatory diseases. Exp. Mol. Med. 49, e340–e340 (2017).
Beura, L. K. et al. Normalizing the environment recapitulates adult human immune traits in laboratory mice. Nature 532, 512–516 (2016).
Rosshart, S. P. et al. Laboratory mice born to wild mice have natural microbiota and model human immune responses. Science 365, eaaw4361 (2019).
Kaelberer, M. M. et al. A gut–brain neural circuit for nutrient sensory transduction. Science 361, eaat5236 (2018).
Han, W. et al. A neural circuit for gut-induced reward. Cell 175, 665–678.e23 (2018).
Pavlov, V. A. & Tracey, K. J. The vagus nerve and the inflammatory reflex-linking immunity and metabolism. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 8, 743–754 (2012).
Muller, P. A. et al. Microbiota modulate sympathetic neurons via a gut–brain circuit. Nature 583, 441–446 (2020).
Ren, W. et al. Sympathetic nerve-enteroendocrine L cell communication modulates GLP-1 release, brain glucose utilization, and cognitive function. Neuron 112, 972–990.e8 (2024).
Bayrer, J. R. et al. Gut enterochromaffin cells drive visceral pain and anxiety. Nature 616, 137–142 (2023).
Lai, T.-T. et al. The gut microbiota modulate locomotion via vagus-dependent glucagon-like peptide-1 signaling. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 10, 2 (2024).
Lai, T.-T., Liou, C.-W., Tsai, Y.-H., Lin, Y.-Y. & Wu, W.-L. Butterflies in the gut: the interplay between intestinal microbiota and stress. J. Biomed. Sci. 30, 92 (2023).
Wu, J.-T. et al. Oral short-chain fatty acids administration regulates innate anxiety in adult microbiome-depleted mice. Neuropharmacology 214, 109140 (2022).
Anderson, D. J. Circuit modules linking internal states and social behaviour in flies and mice. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 692–704 (2016).
Chen, P. & Hong, W. Neural circuit mechanisms of social behavior. Neuron 98, 16–30 (2018).
Sokolowski, K. & Corbin, J. G. Wired for behaviors: from development to function of innate limbic system circuitry. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 5, 55 (2012).
Gunaydin, L. A. et al. Natural neural projection dynamics underlying social behavior. Cell 157, 1535–1551 (2014).
Batten, S. R. et al. Dopamine and serotonin in human substantia nigra track social context and value signals during economic exchange. Nat. Hum. Behav. 8, 718–728 (2024).
Liu, Y. et al. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of the first social relationship: a conserved role of 5-HT from mice to monkeys, upstream of oxytocin. Neuron 111, 1468–1485.e7 (2023).
Kane, M. J. et al. Mice genetically depleted of brain serotonin display social impairments, communication deficits and repetitive behaviors: possible relevance to autism. PLoS ONE 7, e48975 (2012).
Beis, D. et al. Brain serotonin deficiency leads to social communication deficits in mice. Biol. Lett. 11, 20150057 (2015).
Rivalan, M. et al. Serotonin drives aggression and social behaviors of laboratory male mice in a semi-natural environment. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 18, 1450540 (2024).
MacDonald, K. & MacDonald, T. M. The peptide that binds: a systematic review of oxytocin and its prosocial effects in humans. Harv. Rev. Psychiatry 18, 1–21 (2010).
Insel, T. R. A neurobiological basis of social attachment. Am. J. Psychiatry 154, 726–735 (1997).
Rich, M. E., deCárdenas, E. J., Lee, H.-J. & Caldwell, H. K. Impairments in the initiation of maternal behavior in oxytocin receptor knockout mice. PLoS ONE 9, e98839 (2014).
Winslow, J. T. & Insel, T. R. The social deficits of the oxytocin knockout mouse. Neuropeptides 36, 221–229 (2002).
Insel, T. R. & Shapiro, L. E. Oxytocin receptor distribution reflects social organization in monogamous and polygamous voles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 5981–5985 (1992).
Grebe, N. M. et al. Neural correlates of mating system diversity: oxytocin and vasopressin receptor distributions in monogamous and non-monogamous Eulemur. Sci. Rep. 11, 3746 (2021).
de Jong, T. R. & Neumann, I. D. Oxytocin and aggression. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci. 35, 175–192 (2018).
Roelofs, K. et al. Hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis hyperresponsiveness is associated with increased social avoidance behavior in social phobia. Biol. Psychiatry 65, 336–343 (2009).
Moreno-Fernández, R. D. et al. Social avoidance and altered hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis in a mouse model of anxious depression: the role of LPA1 receptor. Behav. Brain Res. 455, 114681 (2023).
Iob, E., Kirschbaum, C. & Steptoe, A. Positive and negative social support and HPA-axis hyperactivity: evidence from glucocorticoids in human hair. Psychoneuroendocrinology 96, 100–108 (2018).
Heck, A. L. et al. Social isolation alters hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis activity after chronic variable stress in male C57BL/6 mice. Stress 23, 457–465 (2020).
DeVries, A. C. Interaction among social environment, the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, and behavior. Horm. Behav. 41, 405–413 (2002).
Raam, T. & Hong, W. Organization of neural circuits underlying social behavior: a consideration of the medial amygdala. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 68, 124–136 (2021).
Lin, D. et al. Functional identification of an aggression locus in the mouse hypothalamus. Nature 470, 221–226 (2011).
Falkner, A. L. et al. Hierarchical representations of aggression in a hypothalamic–midbrain circuit. Neuron 106, 637–648.e6 (2020).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank members of the Mazmanian laboratory for discussions and critical reading of the manuscript and C. Oikonomou (California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA) for invaluable manuscript editing. The authors acknowledge the supported of L. and B. Fetter, C. Trimble, The Heritage Medical Research Institute, NIH (grant nos. MH100556 and AG063744) (J.A.G. and S.K.M.), Arizona State University (ASU) Biodesign Center for Health Through Microbiomes Start-up (K.N. and R.K.-B.) and National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) Taiwan (grant nos. 113-2628-B-006-013- and 114-2628-B-006-013) (W.-L.W.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to all aspects of the article.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
S.K.M. is co-founder of Axial Therapeutics and Nuanced Health, and has equity in Seed Health, Time BioVentures and Intrinsic Medicine. K.N. and R.K.-B. have pending/approved patents for Pitt-Hopkins Syndrome (PTHS) biomarkers and the use of Microbiota Transplant Therapy for various conditions, including PTHS and autism. R.K.-B is a co-founder of Autism Diagnostics LLC and Gut–Brain Axis Therapeutics. There are no conflicts with the current work. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Microbiology thanks Gerard Clarke, Peter Holzer and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Griffiths, J.A., Nirmalkar, K., Wu, WL. et al. The gut microbiome shapes social behaviour across animal species. Nat Rev Microbiol 24, 328–343 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-025-01262-y
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-025-01262-y


