We Can't Ignore The Glaring Red Flags In JD & Usha Vance's Marriage

We may receive a commission on purchases made from links.

Usha Vance once suggested her husband be kinder on social media. JD Vance's response, made at the 2025 Conservative Political Action Conference, was a laugh and a shrug: "I don't know if I'll take that advice." While this was more of an orange flag than a red flag, it also wasn't the first time JD Vance showed some disregard for his wife Usha's opinion, perspective, or identity.

Around the same time, at an event in Michigan, JD gestured towards Usha standing behind him and smirked, saying (via X), "The cameras are all on; anything I say, no matter how crazy, she has to smile, laugh, and celebrate it." The line landed as intended, with a round of comfortable laughter. In that room, a wife's agreeable silence was assumed.

The tableau — wife as obliging witness — has long been a fixture in American political life. But here, the arrangement feels more brittle. When a woman's role is reduced to smiling support for a man who delights in public antagonism, where does her agency go? Has it been carefully negotiated behind closed doors, or simply absorbed into the spectacle itself?  Either way, it's difficult not to notice the growing stack of red flags in JD and Usha Vance's marriage. And the longer they go unacknowledged, the more important they seem.

JD Vance's origin story has been told many times — most notably in his memoir "Hillbilly Elegy." Born in Ohio's beleaguered Rust Belt, JD was raised primarily by his grandmother. The book's blurb frames his childhood as "the true story of what a social, regional, and class decline feels like when you were born with it hanging around your neck." Usha, in contrast, grew up in middle-class suburban San Diego, in a Hindu household. The daughter of Indian immigrants, she followed a steady, upward path through elite institutions.

When the two met at Yale Law, Usha had already mastered the setting. JD, less fluent in Ivy League social codes, leaned on her as a cultural translator. According to a friend who spoke to the The New Yorker, Usha kept a spreadsheet of things she thought JD should try (Greek yogurt among them), gently introducing him to the tastes and expectations of the intelligentsia.

None of this, in itself, is a red flag. Plenty of couples navigate contrasting upbringings, and even draw strength from the balance. But what makes the Vances unusual is the way JD seems to direct his sharpest resentments towards people whose lives resemble his wife's. Notably, he has mocked what he called the "hyper-woke, sort of coastal elites," charging them with corroding the country's values from within (via X). These aren't irreconcilable differences. But how do you build a marriage when one person is defined, at least publicly, by an animus towards the world the other came from?

Before she became a vice-presidential spouse, Usha was "of the left-ish political persuasion," according to the Yale Daily News. After completing her undergraduate degree at Yale, she went on to study at Cambridge, where, a friend recalled, her social circle leaned reliably liberal, occasionally even tipping into actual leftism. She remained a registered Democrat until 2014 — the year she married JD. Former colleagues at her San Francisco law firm would later describe her to The New York Times as moderate or liberal, but certainly not conservative.

Her husband's political journey has moved in a less ambiguous direction. In a 2022 campaign ad, he stared into the camera and asked, "Are you a racist? Do you hate Mexicans?" A pause, then the pivot. The real threat, he insisted, was not bigotry, but the perception of bigotry — a distortion manufactured by the media, aimed at ordinary Ohioans who want to put "America first".

Since then, JD's policies have hardened. He has backed abortion bans, pledged allegiance to Project 2025, and pushed for sweeping deportations. During a rally in Wisconsin in 2024, he claimed immigrants were to blame for rising housing costs, then blamed legal Haitian refugees for overstretching local hospitals. It was a crude reframing of a familiar panic, and one that pointedly casts immigrant families as the problem. Usha's parents moved to the US in the 1970s from India. It's one thing to have starkly different politics than your partner. It's another to watch that partner campaign against the values that once shaped your life.

JD Vance has said, with a studied humility, that he "married up." The inordinately accomplished Usha clerked for two Supreme Court justices and built a formidable career at Munger, Tolles & Olson, a prestigious law firm known for its progressiveness. Usha's biography on the firm's website described her as "a skilled litigator specializing in higher education, local government, and technology sectors" (per Business Insider). But it vanished shortly after JD was announced as Trump's vice-presidential nominee.

Usha resigned from the firm that same week. With her departure, not only did her biography disappear, but so did the public record of her work. Officially, she had chosen to step back. Unofficially, it was impossible not to notice her career had been erased at the moment JD's was taking flight.

There is no evidence Usha wished to be second lady. In interviews, she has sounded, at best, hesitant. "I don't know that anyone is ever ready for that kind of scrutiny ... I'm not raring to change anything about our lives right now," she said on Fox & Friends during the 2024 campaign. Asked what she might focus on in a White House role, Usha admitted: "It's not something I'm terribly familiar with." At one point, JD had floated the idea of becoming a stay-at-home father. But as political life took over, it was Usha who moved to Ohio, left her job, and who now sits beside Trump (whose marriage to Melania has its own red flags), smiling for the cameras.

At Yale Law, JD earned a reputation for intensity. His classmates weren't always sure where he stood on specific issues, but they did remember a kind of reflexive political absolutism. As his former roommate, now Democratic state senator, Josh McLaurin recalled to The New Yorker, "He was a maverick ideologically." 

This attitude has calcified with time. In 2024, whilst campaigning as Trump's running mate, Vance appeared on "Tucker Carlson Tonight" and diagnosed the country's ills as the fault of "childless cat ladies" — a shorthand, presumably, for liberal women who failed to live the kinds of lives Vance considers serious. "They're miserable at their own lives and the choices that they've made," he said, and therefore "wanted to make the rest of the country miserable, too." Feminist critics didn't need to read between the lines. In Vance's worldview, it seems a woman's worth is tethered to her function within a traditional family structure. To mother is to matter. To remain unmarried or child-free — or worse still, to pursue influence outside that framework — is to pose a threat. 

Usha later brushed off the comment on Fox & Friends as "a quip made in service of making a point." But that point was precisely the problem. Vance's rhetoric reflects a narrow vision of womanhood that dictates women orient their lives around someone else's legacy. When a marriage rests on that doctrinal tightrope, a woman's identity risks collapsing entirely in service of her husband's platform.

As JD rose to national prominence, Usha became a target of fury among the right's most devoted supporters. But for weeks, JD said nothing. Eventually, he addressed the antipathy during an interview with Megyn Kelly. But rather than use the moment to forcefully condemn the white supremacists targeting Usha, he redirected the conversation away from racism to the economic plight of working people. "Obviously, she's not a white person, and we've been accused, attacked by some white supremacists over that," he said, before adding: "She's such a good mom. She's such a brilliant lawyer, and I'm so proud of her. But yes, her experience has given me some perspective on the way in which it's really hard for working families in this country."

Later, when racist social media posts by Marko Elez, a Musk-aligned DOGE aide, surfaced — including calls to "normalize Indian hate" — Vance's concern lay not with his wife or their children, but with the reputation of Elez, then 25. "I don't think stupid social media activity should ruin a kid's life," JD wrote on X. When Indian-American Congressman Ro Khanna challenged his response, referencing JD's family, JD called Khanna's comments "emotional blackmail" and wrote, "You disgust me."

For someone who built his brand on defending the American family, JD's reluctance to defend his own is staggering. There are marriages built on mutual ambition, others on love and compromise. But when one partner becomes a lightning rod for the very forces the other refuses to name — let alone confront — the most glaring red flag isn't just what's said, but what's left unsaid.