Post

Přihlásit seZaregistrovat se

Post

user avatar
GitHub
@github
We benchmarked the GitHub Copilot agentic harness against the harnesses that ship leading models natively. Holding the model and task fixed across SWE-bench Verified, SWE-bench Pro, SkillsBench, TerminalBench, and Win-Hill, the results were clear: ✅ Task resolution on par with model-vendor harnesses ✅ Fewer tokens across most configurations 💡 A key learning: With GitHub Copilot supporting more than 20 models, you're free to pick efficiency or peak quality per task.
Scatter plot titled "Resolution rate vs. cost per task," plotting resolution rate (pass@1, y-axis, 62–78%) against mean cost per task in USD (x-axis, $0.40–$1.40). Each marker is one agent × model configuration (mean of 5 runs on Terminal-Bench 2), surrounded by a shaded ±1σ ellipse. A legend identifies three agents by color: Copilot CLI (purple), Codex CLI (gray), and Claude Code (teal). The subtitle notes that up and to the left is better: higher resolution at lower cost. A dashed vertical line splits the points into two clusters: lower-cost GPT-family models (GPT-5.4 and GPT-5.5) on the left, and higher-cost Claude-family models (Sonnet 4.6 and Opus 4.7) on the right.
22:14 · 28. 6. 202669,1 tis.Zhlédnutí

Jste na platformě X noví?

Zaregistrujte se a získejte svou vlastní časovou osu.

Vytvořit účet

Registrací vyjadřujete souhlas se smluvními podmínkami a zásadami ochrany osobních údajů, včetně zásad používání souborů cookie.

Relevantní lidé

user avatar
GitHub@githubSledovat

Aktuální trendy

Terms·Privacy·Cookies·Zpřístupnění·Ads Info·© 2026 X Corp.
Don't miss what's happening
Uživatelé platformy X se vše dozví jako první.
Přihlásit seZaregistrovat se