Post

Log indTilmeld dig

Post

user avatar
GitHub
@github
We benchmarked the GitHub Copilot agentic harness against the harnesses that ship leading models natively. Holding the model and task fixed across SWE-bench Verified, SWE-bench Pro, SkillsBench, TerminalBench, and Win-Hill, the results were clear: ✅ Task resolution on par with model-vendor harnesses ✅ Fewer tokens across most configurations 💡 A key learning: With GitHub Copilot supporting more than 20 models, you're free to pick efficiency or peak quality per task.
Scatter plot titled "Resolution rate vs. cost per task," plotting resolution rate (pass@1, y-axis, 62–78%) against mean cost per task in USD (x-axis, $0.40–$1.40). Each marker is one agent × model configuration (mean of 5 runs on Terminal-Bench 2), surrounded by a shaded ±1σ ellipse. A legend identifies three agents by color: Copilot CLI (purple), Codex CLI (gray), and Claude Code (teal). The subtitle notes that up and to the left is better: higher resolution at lower cost. A dashed vertical line splits the points into two clusters: lower-cost GPT-family models (GPT-5.4 and GPT-5.5) on the left, and higher-cost Claude-family models (Sonnet 4.6 and Opus 4.7) on the right.
22.14 · 28. jun. 202669,1 tVisninger

Ny på X?

Tilmeld dig nu, og få din egen, helt personlige tidslinje!

Opret konto

Ved at tilmelde dig, accepterer du vores vilkår for anvendelse og privatlivspolitik, herunder brug af cookies.

Relevante personer

user avatar
GitHub@githubFølg

Trender nu

Terms·Privacy·Cookies·Tilgængelighed·Ads Info·© 2026 X Corp.
Don't miss what's happening
Folk på X er de første, der ved det.
Log indTilmeld dig