Post

Iniciar sesiónRegístrate

Post

user avatar
GitHub
@github
We benchmarked the GitHub Copilot agentic harness against the harnesses that ship leading models natively. Holding the model and task fixed across SWE-bench Verified, SWE-bench Pro, SkillsBench, TerminalBench, and Win-Hill, the results were clear: ✅ Task resolution on par with model-vendor harnesses ✅ Fewer tokens across most configurations 💡 A key learning: With GitHub Copilot supporting more than 20 models, you're free to pick efficiency or peak quality per task.
Scatter plot titled "Resolution rate vs. cost per task," plotting resolution rate (pass@1, y-axis, 62–78%) against mean cost per task in USD (x-axis, $0.40–$1.40). Each marker is one agent × model configuration (mean of 5 runs on Terminal-Bench 2), surrounded by a shaded ±1σ ellipse. A legend identifies three agents by color: Copilot CLI (purple), Codex CLI (gray), and Claude Code (teal). The subtitle notes that up and to the left is better: higher resolution at lower cost. A dashed vertical line splits the points into two clusters: lower-cost GPT-family models (GPT-5.4 and GPT-5.5) on the left, and higher-cost Claude-family models (Sonnet 4.6 and Opus 4.7) on the right.
22:14 · 28 jun 202669,1 milReproducciones

¿Eres nuevo en X?

Regístrate ahora para obtener tu propia cronología personalizada.

Crear cuenta

Al registrarte, aceptas los Términos de servicio y la Política de Privacidad, incluyendo el Uso de Cookies.

Personas relevantes

user avatar
GitHub@githubSeguir

Tendencias del momento

Terms·Privacy·Cookies·Accesibilidad·Ads Info·© 2026 X Corp.
Don't miss what's happening
Las personas en X son las primeras en enterarse.
Iniciar sesiónRegístrate