Lägg upp

Logga inRegistrera dig

Lägg upp

user avatar
GitHub
@github
We benchmarked the GitHub Copilot agentic harness against the harnesses that ship leading models natively. Holding the model and task fixed across SWE-bench Verified, SWE-bench Pro, SkillsBench, TerminalBench, and Win-Hill, the results were clear: ✅ Task resolution on par with model-vendor harnesses ✅ Fewer tokens across most configurations 💡 A key learning: With GitHub Copilot supporting more than 20 models, you're free to pick efficiency or peak quality per task.
Scatter plot titled "Resolution rate vs. cost per task," plotting resolution rate (pass@1, y-axis, 62–78%) against mean cost per task in USD (x-axis, $0.40–$1.40). Each marker is one agent × model configuration (mean of 5 runs on Terminal-Bench 2), surrounded by a shaded ±1σ ellipse. A legend identifies three agents by color: Copilot CLI (purple), Codex CLI (gray), and Claude Code (teal). The subtitle notes that up and to the left is better: higher resolution at lower cost. A dashed vertical line splits the points into two clusters: lower-cost GPT-family models (GPT-5.4 and GPT-5.5) on the left, and higher-cost Claude-family models (Sonnet 4.6 and Opus 4.7) on the right.
22:14 · 28 juni 202669,1 tnVisningar

Är du ny på X?

Registrera dig nu och få en personlig tidslinje!

Skapa ett konto

Genom att registrera dig godkänner du användarvillkoren och integritetspolicyn, däribland användningen av cookies.

Relevanta personer

user avatar
GitHub@githubFölj

På uppgång nu

Terms·Privacy·Cookies·Tillgänglighet·Ads Info·© 2026 X Corp.
Don't miss what's happening
Folk på X får reda på allt först.
Logga inRegistrera dig