Sulcalization
Sulcalization (from Latin: sulcus 'groove'), in phonetics, is the pronunciation of a sound with a deep, longitudinal concavity (groove) down the back of the tongue (the dorsum), roughly opposite of the uvula.[1] This is accomplished by raising the sides of the dorsum, and leaving a hollow along the mid-line.[2][3]
This articulation has typically been associated with rhotics such as a 'bunched' or 'molar' [ɹ̈][4][5] and r-colored vowels,[6][7][1] as well as 'dark' or 'throaty' quality sounds,[3] either more velar-like (such as [ɫ])[2][8] or more pharyngeal-like (such as [ɒ]).[9][10]
No spoken language is known to make a phonemic distinction between sulcalized and ordinary vowels;[3] though it has been reported that for some speakers of Received Pronunciation, the vowel /ɒ/, which is normally described as rounded, is pronounced with spread lips, and is instead given its characteristic quality through a "hollowing or sulcalization of the tongue-body."[9] One scholar has also suggested that the vowel in the RP pronunciation of words like bird, typically transcribed /ɜ/, is actually a sulcal schwa, retaining the sulcality of the original rhotic consonant. Accordingly, the realization of the /ə/-element of the centring diphthongs /ɪə̯/, /ʊə̯/, /ɛə̯/ in words such as near, pure and scare, is interpreted as the product of a loss of sulcality.[7]
Grooved fricative
[edit]Some linguists have referred to grooved fricatives, a similar but distinct articulatory concept, as sulcalized,[11] though this should not be confused with the more standard definition described in the section above. Contrasting with slit fricatives, which are pronounced with the tongue flat, grooved fricatives also involve forming a groove down the center of the tongue (such as in some realizations of /s/ in the English words sit and case).[11]
Unlike the more standard definition of sulcalization, though, grooved fricatives involve the sides of the tongue focusing the airstream on the teeth, producing a more intense sound, typically associated with sibilants.[12] J. C. Catford observed that the degree of tongue grooving differs between places of articulation as well as between languages;[13] however, no language is known to contrast sibilants based purely on the presence or absence of tongue grooving.
/θ/ has been reported to show tongue grooving in English, despite being typically regarded as slit.[14]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- Catford, J. C. (1977). Fundamental Problems in Phonetics. Indiana University Press. ISBN 0-253-32520-X.
- Catford, J. C. (2001). "On Rs, Rhotacism and Paleophony". Journal of the International Phonetic Association. 31 (2): 171–85. JSTOR 44645159.
- Catford, John C.; Esling, John H. (2006). "Articulatory Phonetics". In Brown, Keith (ed.). Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (2nd ed.). Elsevier. pp. 425–442. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00002-X. ISBN 9780080448541.
- Erickson, Blaine (2003). "On the development of English r". In Minkova, Donka; Stockwell, Robert (eds.). Studies in the History of the English Language: A Millennial Perspective. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 183–206. doi:10.1515/9783110197143.2.183. ISBN 978-3-11-017368-0.
- Jones, Daniel (2009) [1950]. The phoneme: its nature and use. Heffer. ISBN 9780521108072.
- King, Hannah (2020), Seeing is perceiving: The role of the lips in the production and perception of Anglo-English /r/ (PDF), Université de Paris
- Lass, Roger (1984). Phonology: an introduction to basic concepts. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521237284.
- Lowman, G. S. (1932). "The phonetics of Albanian". Language. 8 (4): 271–293. doi:10.2307/408833. JSTOR 408833.
- Mott, Brian Leonard (2011). English Phonetics and Phonology for Spanish Speakers. Universitat. Vol. 49 (2a ed.). Publicacions i Edicions (Universitat de Barcelona). p. 56. ISBN 9788447535040.
- Nolan, Francis (1988). "2.2 Vowels". Journal of the International Phonetic Association. 18 (2): 69–74. JSTOR 44526002.
- Stone, M.; Lundberg, A. (1996). "Three-dimensional tongue surface shapes of English consonants and vowels". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 99 (6): 3728–3737. Bibcode:1996ASAJ...99.3728S. doi:10.1121/1.414969. PMID 8655804.
- ^ a b Catford & Esling 2006, p. 440.
- ^ a b Lowman 1932, p. 278.
- ^ a b c Jones 2009, p. 82.
- ^ Catford 2001, pp. 172–173, 176.
- ^ King 2020, pp. 47, 122, 124.
- ^ Nolan 1988, p. 74.
- ^ a b Erickson 2003, p. 197.
- ^ Catford 1977, p. 157.
- ^ a b Lass 1984, p. 124.
- ^ King 2020, p. 61.
- ^ a b Mott 2011, p. 56.
- ^ Catford 1977, p. 127.
- ^ Catford 1977, p. ?.
- ^ Stone & Lundberg 1996.