Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/WikiProjects
 | This is an information page. It is not an encyclopedic article, nor one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines; rather, its purpose is to explain certain aspects of Wikipedia's norms, customs, technicalities, or practices. It may reflect differing levels of consensus and vetting. |
There are no separate for venues for the deletion discussion of WikiProjects, thus all WikiProject deletion discussions are to be taken place at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion (MFD) and are subject to the guidelines of the same.
This page, however, maintains an automatic list of the ongoing deletion discussions of the various WikiProjects, or their subpages, and serves as an one-stop destination for those who are only primarily interested in WikiProject-related MfDs.
There are currently 1 WikiProject-related MfDs ongoing.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep. Salvio giuliano 19:53, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cryptozoology/to do (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)
- (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) KylieTastic (talk) 19:51, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
Relic without an associated Project page, not used by the inactive WikiProject (nor was ever used in any meaningful way), no incoming links. Delete as what should be an uncontroversial cleanup. TNstingray (talk) 22:01, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- Assuming that you are a member of the WikiProject, and have noted on the WikiProject talk page that you are doing cleanup? SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:30, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- Keep, was once useful. The history is brief but I consider, say, this edit to be meaningful. Graham87 (talk) 08:04, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KylieTastic (talk) 19:51, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
- Mark Historical as per Graham87 and KylieTastic. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:22, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.