-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
Update help message for 'path' argument to match user's environment #13937
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
hunterhogan
wants to merge
1
commit into
python:main
Choose a base branch
from
hunterhogan:path_help_text
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ | |||||
import subprocess | ||||||
import sys | ||||||
from importlib.util import find_spec | ||||||
from pathlib import Path | ||||||
from pathlib import Path, PurePath | ||||||
|
||||||
from ts_utils.paths import TEST_CASES_DIR, test_cases_path | ||||||
from ts_utils.utils import colored | ||||||
|
@@ -58,15 +58,17 @@ def main() -> None: | |||||
choices=("3.9", "3.10", "3.11", "3.12", "3.13"), | ||||||
help="Target Python version for the test (default: %(default)s).", | ||||||
) | ||||||
parser.add_argument("path", help="Path of the stub to test in format <folder>/<stub>, from the root of the project.") | ||||||
parser.add_argument( | ||||||
"path", help=f"Path of the stub to test in format {PurePath('<folder>', '<stub>')}, from the root of the project." | ||||||
) | ||||||
args = parser.parse_args() | ||||||
path: str = args.path | ||||||
run_stubtest: bool = args.run_stubtest | ||||||
python_version: str = args.python_version | ||||||
|
||||||
path_tokens = Path(path).parts | ||||||
if len(path_tokens) != 2: | ||||||
parser.error("'path' argument should be in format <folder>/<stub>.") | ||||||
parser.error(f"'path' argument should be in format {PurePath('<folder>', '<stub>')}.") | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Isn't
Suggested change
>>> from pathlib import Path
>>> path = Path('<folder>', '<stub>')
>>> print(path, type(path))
<folder>\<stub> <class 'pathlib._local.WindowsPath'> I still would prefer fixing the support for forward-slashes. As that's intended to work. |
||||||
folder, stub = path_tokens | ||||||
if folder not in {"stdlib", "stubs"}: | ||||||
parser.error("Only the 'stdlib' and 'stubs' folders are supported.") | ||||||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same comment/question as below
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't have enough knowledge to say whether Path or PurePath is better or if they are the same. PurePath lacks the logic that interacts with the filesystem, and in this case, the
<
and>
characters are illegal in Windows. So, I would balk at using Path because I would be worried that Path might try to validate the "path" and throw an error.That same logic could be extended to suggest that
os.path.sep
is safer thanPurePath
.Nevertheless, I don't know: I am speculating.
Path does work on my Windows system, though.