Re: [RFC] Clarify discussion and voting period rules
From: Tim Düsterhus Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 14:24:22 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC] Clarify discussion and voting period rules References: 1 2 3 4 5 Groups: php.internals Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-128880@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi Am 2025-10-17 10:40, schrieb Tim Düsterhus:I have now made the change: https://github.com/php/policies/pull/23/commits/3311f2e72402b456aff78de4e4d8f8b8ccbcd05c Given the previous reasoning of “the policy doesn't disallow this” and all the Errata policy being a SHOULD (including the new bits), I'm treating this change as a Minor Change. Best regards Tim DüsterhusRegarding the errata section: If the original text or examples may not be altered, it would be useful to at least allow adding info boxes to examples whose semantics have changed (for the same reason as mentioned above, examples are frequently the only thing people pay attention to).That makes sense to me. I don't think the proposed policy text disallows this, but I'll look if I can spell it out more explicitly that this is encouraged.
Thread (40 messages)
| « previous | php.internals (#128880) | next » |
|---|