Re: [RFC][Discussion] Using TidyException new type for tidy extension
Hi
Am 2025-10-26 18:09, schrieb David CARLIER:
Thank you for the RFC. I believe moving to Exceptions for error handling is the right thing, so I support the RFC in principle.
However the proposal is *very* bare-bones. It would be useful to describe which errors can currently be emitted from ext/tidy, so that we can discuss a proper Exception hierarchy. In the PR I'm seeing just 3 locations - are those all of them?
Naming-wise I wonder if we should go all the way to \Tidy\TidyException (i.e. with a namespace) right away.
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
Thread (4 messages)