On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Christian Schneider wrote:
> Derick Rethans wrote:
> > I updated the proposal:
> > http://files.derickrethans.nl/property_overloading.html
> >
> > If nobody as any better idea on how to solve it I'd like to start
> > implementing it.
>
> I seem to remember that we had some voices here stating that the current
> mechanisms are sufficient. Adding new keywords and/or new magic methods is
> something which should have a very high threshold as it complicates the
> language.
If you would have properly read the proposal you see that there are 3!
problems with it. And instead of whining about things, I actually spend
some time of contributing with patches too.
And how can you possibly argue that this more complex than all the other
OO crap that people are suggesting here....
regards,
Derick
--
Derick Rethans
http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org