On 11.03.2010, at 17:26, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> On 03/11/2010 06:21 PM, Scott MacVicar wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 11, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/11/2010 04:41 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>>>> @jani: committing to a stable branch because you are getting a new laptop is not
>>>> really a convincing argument. :)
>>>
>>> Losing the one with the changes in it is. Doing patches will only cause endless
>>> headaches. Please move on, nothing to see here, it's all for GOOD anyway, fixing bugs USED to
>>> be okay in any branch. Besides, this is not end-of-world. If it is for someone, I suggest changing
>>> profession.
>>>
>>> I'd like to have branch for PHP_5_4, I'll also volunteer for RM on it.
>>> Perhaps it makes people wanting to get movement in HEAD to actually do something about it.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> I'm all for 5.4, I have a bunch of patches against PHP_5_3 that I want to commit such
>> a large integer support, I couldn't develop against HEAD since it's just not usable.
>>
>> I think we can officially call PHP6 stalled and should move forward with 5.4 and revisit
>> unicode support in the future.
>
>
> PHP_5_4 is now there. Feel free. Merging the PHP_5_3_FPM might be a good idea too.
could you maybe use your own svn server if you want your own private php project?
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
mls@pooteeweet.org