Re: Re: moving forward
> Oh no .. another dangerous topic. Again we have been there even before the switch. The idea is
> to keep the centralized repo on svn, because the masses know how it works, the tools are widely
> available and we have plenty of experience among us in how to keep svn running. I see little
> incentive to move the _central_ repo to a DVCS. Are the bridges to git, mercurial, bzaar etc really
> so bad that this topic is worth discussing (no sarcasm, honest question)?
I only have experience with git. The problem with something like
git-svn is that your git branch becomes an island. I can't share that
branch with anyone else. So all I really get is git syntax within an
svn environment.
I have no problem working with svn and actually prefer it for projects
that use a compiler. For PHP apps, git is great because nothing has
to be built. Bouncing between git branches means I have to recompile
PHP every time (or set up some system of symlinks).
--
Herman Radtke
hermanradtke@gmail.com | http://hermanradtke.com
Thread (10 messages)