On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
> On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:27, Frederic Hardy wrote:
> >
> > Why not use arrayIterator::seek() ?
>
> Because the functionality isn't exactly the same.
> ArrayIterator::seek() only sets the array pointer, array_seek would
> also return the value + have fseek()-like functionality with the
> SEEK_* consts and optional negative offsets.
To be honest, I'd rather have the proposed array_seek() return a status
whether the seek worked or not. Notices are uncool and you can already
retrieve data/key with key() and current().
with kind regards,
Derick
--
http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org
Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: http://xdebug.org/donate.php
twitter: @derickr and @xdebug