hi,
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <mls@pooteeweet.org> wrote:
>
> On 23.03.2010, at 23:04, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>
>> What about defining a release manager for the next release? I think that
>> is an important aspect of moving things forward. I also thought the dual
>> RM in PHP 5.3 worked quite well although it is not necessarily a must.
>
>
> Yeah, lets get that clarified. Derick has stepped up and seems quite committed and nobody
> seemed to oppose him RMing the next release. In case he feels he needs support he can propose a
> co-RM, after all its important that the two RM's know and trust each other well so that they
> can speak with a consistent voice.
As I think it is still a bit early to design RMs, I am still in favour
of David and you. Or David and someone else with good communication
skills. You suggested Chris and I think he could do a great job. My
only worry is his time availability. But I'm definitively not in
favour of Derick, he has been a RM already, let give newer people a
chance.
Cheers,
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org