Re: Allow (...)->foo() expressions not only for `new`

From: Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:20:16 +0000
Subject: Re: Allow (...)->foo() expressions not only for `new`
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-66221@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message 
Am 25.2.2013 um 23:07 schrieb Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net>:

>> (For me, it's changes like Sara's trailing comma proposal that are too
>> small to have needed an RFC)
>> 
> When it comes to changing syntax, there is no such thing as too small
> of an RFC IMO.  Runtime changes can occasionally be hand-waved, but
> syntax changes are serious business.
> 
> -Sara


Don't consider it as a syntax change, only as a bugfix. It must have been a
bug, that this degree of conformity was not yet reached. :-P

It's only stupid to vote about such microscopic changes as long as there are
no real arguments against it in the discussion preceding the implementation.


Bob

Thread (32 messages)

« previous php.internals (#66221) next »