On 2013-03-07, Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com> wrote:
> On 03/07/2013 09:01 AM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
>
>> So my proposal is to slow down for a minute and not call this RFC
>> accepted or not until we can come to some consensus as to if it
>> classifies as a language change or not... Better to clarify for the
>> health of the project than to plow through and risk causing further
>> strife...
>
> And how do you propose we do that? Vote on it? Will that vote need 2/3
> as well? I think most of us accepted that language-level changes meant
> syntax changes. Things that add new features to the language itself.
I think the only thing requiring a 2/3 vote would be the decision on
wheather to enable it by default or not. As long as it's in ext/
and not enabled a 50% should be sufficient.