On 7 December 2013 14:09, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote:
> On 07/12/13 21:47, Adam Harvey wrote:
>> To be clear: I've voted -1 for exactly this reason, and this reason
>> alone. I don't think implementing this piecemeal (without the
>> E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR changes) is the right way to go — I would prefer
>> to have the whole thing as part of a 6.0 release, rather than
>> potentially confusing users with a partial implementation.
>>
>
> Maybe I'm misunderstanding you here, but if you don't want it piecemeal,
> surely just vote "Yes"? Or are you saying you want it in 6.0, and also that
> it shouldn't be piecemeal?
I guess I explained that badly. :) The latter: I want it in 6.0, and
don't think it should be piecemeal.
Adam