Hi!
The patch, and vote, is only for automatic property initialization, not
methodless constructors.
If so, the RFC should be cleaned up to reflect what is being voted. I
shouldn't have to apply diffs to RFC to understand what the vote is
about, it should say so in the RFC. If something is not a part of it,
then drop it from the RFC or put it in "Future developments" section.
Sorry, but I think it's pretty clear what is being voted on. Others seem to understand it and I don't know how to make it any clearer than it already is now. It certainly doesn't need a diff to understand it. But feel free to improve it yourself. Thanks.
-Gordon