Re: [VOTE] CI tests RFC
Hi!
> Then why do you have as an option in your voting "Revert immediately"?
> That should never be happening.
Because it is an option, and if we need any of the options then the
build is already broken, despite the fact it should not normally happen.
Note also "immediately" has built-in delay of 2 days. But if you really
don't like the option, don't vote for it - if it has less than 50% of
votes, it will not be accepted. However, in that case, the question
remains what to do with such commits. Having RM fix everything may not
be an option - the RM may not have time, and may not have expertise or
platform to fix a particular part. So what would we do instead?
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227
Thread (18 messages)