On 5/7/14, 5:30 PM, Levi Morrison wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Lin Yo-An <cornelius.howl@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Why using an additional ":" symbol for the return type? what about
considering this:
*snip*
In the case of the colon I value being compatible with Hack more than the
small gain of omitting the colon.
^^ What Levi said. Colon vs. no colon is an easily bikesheddable discussion, and I'm happy to answer that with "follow HACK's lead to avoid confusion/incompatibility later".
--Larry Garfield