On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com> wrote:
> But that is for minor tweaks and optimizations. In this case the way to
> optimize the patch is to undo the 64-bitness in a number of places where
> it doesn't make sense. Putting in a software-imposed limit on class size
> names while still keeping it a 64-bit value in the struct makes no
> sense, for example. Same goes for lineno, line_start, line_end, num_args
> and a couple more that Nikita pointed out.
That's not what we discussed.
> And as far as I am concerned this has nothing to do with phpng. I'd
> still be voting no on it as a 4% memory increase, which, by the way, you
> don't even mention in the impacts section, is still too high for me when
> I know parts of the 4% are completely unnecessary.
We answer that already, be from Nikita, Dmitry or I. And yes, we agree
on these points already.
Cheers,
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org