Hi,
yes, we are shipping code to customers and they should not read the source.
The level of protection gained from obfuscated code is not enough, but just
delivering the opcodes would be ok.
I know that the opcode array might be dumped, this is just to raise the
bar. If I just obfuscate the code there's still the possibilty left to edit
the code directly.
Greetings
Nico
On 21 May 2014 15:52, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote:
>
> On 21 May 2014, at 14:47, Kevin Ingwersen <ingwie2000@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > There are decent obfuscators? … have not seen any.
> > And then, obfuscated code can be reversed still, whilst „sort of“
> compiled code is far harder to reverse engeneer.
>
> For languages which don’t compile down to machine code, like PHP, C#,
> Java, JavaScript, Python, Perl or Ruby, obfuscation and (if it doesn’t use
> byte code) minification is really the best you can get. Such languages
> necessarily cannot be compiled down to the metal, so if you really don’t
> want anyone to read your code, I’m not sure there’s anything you can do.
> Then again, even x86 machine code can be decompiled.
> --
> Andrea Faulds
> http://ajf.me/
>
>
>
>
>