510

I've been updating some of my old code and answers with Swift 3 but when I got to Swift Strings and Indexing with substrings things got confusing.

Specifically I was trying the following:

let str = "Hello, playground"
let prefixRange = str.startIndex..<str.startIndex.advancedBy(5)
let prefix = str.substringWithRange(prefixRange)

where the second line was giving me the following error

Value of type 'String' has no member 'substringWithRange'

I see that String does have the following methods now:

str.substring(to: String.Index)
str.substring(from: String.Index)
str.substring(with: Range<String.Index>)

These were really confusing me at first so I started playing around index and range. This is a followup question and answer for substring. I am adding an answer below to show how they are used.

2

25 Answers 25

1071

enter image description here

All of the following examples use

var str = "Hello, playground"

Swift 4

Strings got a pretty big overhaul in Swift 4. When you get some substring from a String now, you get a Substring type back rather than a String. Why is this? Strings are value types in Swift. That means if you use one String to make a new one, then it has to be copied over. This is good for stability (no one else is going to change it without your knowledge) but bad for efficiency.

A Substring, on the other hand, is a reference back to the original String from which it came. Here is an image from the documentation illustrating that.

No copying is needed so it is much more efficient to use. However, imagine you got a ten character Substring from a million character String. Because the Substring is referencing the String, the system would have to hold on to the entire String for as long as the Substring is around. Thus, whenever you are done manipulating your Substring, convert it to a String.

let myString = String(mySubstring)

This will copy just the substring over and the memory holding old String can be reclaimed. Substrings (as a type) are meant to be short lived.

Another big improvement in Swift 4 is that Strings are Collections (again). That means that whatever you can do to a Collection, you can do to a String (use subscripts, iterate over the characters, filter, etc).

The following examples show how to get a substring in Swift.

Getting substrings

You can get a substring from a string by using subscripts or a number of other methods (for example, prefix, suffix, split). You still need to use String.Index and not an Int index for the range, though. (See my other answer if you need help with that.)

Beginning of a string

You can use a subscript (note the Swift 4 one-sided range):

let index = str.index(str.startIndex, offsetBy: 5)
let mySubstring = str[..<index] // Hello

or prefix:

let index = str.index(str.startIndex, offsetBy: 5)
let mySubstring = str.prefix(upTo: index) // Hello

or even easier:

let mySubstring = str.prefix(5) // Hello

End of a string

Using subscripts:

let index = str.index(str.endIndex, offsetBy: -10)
let mySubstring = str[index...] // playground

or suffix:

let index = str.index(str.endIndex, offsetBy: -10)
let mySubstring = str.suffix(from: index) // playground

or even easier:

let mySubstring = str.suffix(10) // playground

Note that when using the suffix(from: index) I had to count back from the end by using -10. That is not necessary when just using suffix(x), which just takes the last x characters of a String.

Range in a string

Again we simply use subscripts here.

let start = str.index(str.startIndex, offsetBy: 7)
let end = str.index(str.endIndex, offsetBy: -6)
let range = start..<end

let mySubstring = str[range]  // play

Converting Substring to String

Don't forget, when you are ready to save your substring, you should convert it to a String so that the old string's memory can be cleaned up.

let myString = String(mySubstring)

Using an Int index extension?

I'm hesitant to use an Int based index extension after reading the article Strings in Swift 3 by Airspeed Velocity and Ole Begemann. Although in Swift 4, Strings are collections, the Swift team purposely hasn't used Int indexes. It is still String.Index. This has to do with Swift Characters being composed of varying numbers of Unicode codepoints. The actual index has to be uniquely calculated for every string.

I have to say, I hope the Swift team finds a way to abstract away String.Index in the future. But until then, I am choosing to use their API. It helps me to remember that String manipulations are not just simple Int index lookups.

8
  • 61
    Thx for the desctription. Well deserved uprates. Apple overcomplicated this. Substring should be as easy as string.substring[from...to].
    – Teddy
    Commented May 5, 2017 at 15:53
  • 1
    Really good explanation . except one little thing garbage collected ;-) I hope people here know that there is no garbage collection in Swift. Commented Jan 16, 2020 at 16:18
  • @ChristianAnchorDampf, Thanks for taking the time to comment. I took out garbage collecting. How is the new wording?
    – Suragch
    Commented Jan 17, 2020 at 0:46
  • 1
    Thanks for the detailed explanation! Totally agree with @Teddy - unicode width should be implementation details, as most people don't care about how the bytes actually look like. The API design should be around 95% use cases, and provide low level APIs for people who needs to deal with protocol stack etc. Commented Jun 10, 2021 at 21:17
  • 7
    Apple has really made an awful mess of strings. They should not keep changing them between versions of Swift and you should not have to create extensions to do simple things like substring(). This should be built into the language.
    – Anthony.
    Commented Jul 3, 2021 at 0:12
301

I'm really frustrated at Swift's String access model: everything has to be an Index. All I want is to access the i-th character of the string using Int, not the clumsy index and advancing (which happens to change with every major release). So I made an extension to String:

extension String {
    func index(from: Int) -> Index {
        return self.index(startIndex, offsetBy: from)
    }

    func substring(from: Int) -> String {
        let fromIndex = index(from: from)
        return String(self[fromIndex...])
    }

    func substring(to: Int) -> String {
        let toIndex = index(from: to)
        return String(self[..<toIndex])
    }

    func substring(with r: Range<Int>) -> String {
        let startIndex = index(from: r.lowerBound)
        let endIndex = index(from: r.upperBound)
        return String(self[startIndex..<endIndex])
    }
}

let str = "Hello, playground"
print(str.substring(from: 7))         // playground
print(str.substring(to: 5))           // Hello
print(str.substring(with: 7..<11))    // play
25
  • 6
    The indexes are very useful because a character can be more than one byte. Try let str = "🇨🇭🇩🇪🇺🇸Hello" print(str.substring(to: 2))
    – vadian
    Commented Sep 24, 2016 at 15:15
  • 175
    Yes, I understand that a character (i.e. extended grapheme cluster) can take multiple bytes. My frustration is why we have to use the verbose index-advancing method to access the characters of a string. Why can't the Swift team just add some overloads to the Core Library to abstract it away. If I type str[5], I want to access the character at index 5, whatever that character appears to be or how many bytes it takes. Isn't Swift all about developer's productivity? Commented Sep 24, 2016 at 15:51
  • 8
    @RenniePet I believe Apple recognizes the problem and changes are coming. As per the Swift Evolution page on GitHub: "Swift 4 seeks to make strings more powerful and easier-to-use, while retaining Unicode correctness by default". It's vague but let's keep our hopes up Commented Feb 23, 2017 at 2:17
  • 3
    @CodeDifferent why apple didn't add subscript character access? So that people understand that it's bad thing to do. Basically if you would do for i in 0..string.count using subscripts that would be double loop, cause under the hood index has to go through each byte of string to find out which is the next character. If you loop using index, you iterate over string only once. Btw, hate this myself, but that's the reasoning behind subscript being not available on string in swift. Commented Nov 26, 2017 at 15:54
  • 8
    @RaimundasSakalauskas that argument doesn't fly by me. C# has both Unicode correctness and integer subscripting, which is really convenient. In Swift 1, Apple wanted developers to use countElement(str) to find the length. In Swift 3, Apple made string not conforming to Sequence and forced everyone to use str.characters instead. These guys are not afraid of making changes. Their stubbornness on integer subscripting in really hard to understand Commented Nov 26, 2017 at 16:01
193

Swift 5 Extension:

extension String {
    subscript(_ range: CountableRange<Int>) -> String {
        let start = index(startIndex, offsetBy: max(0, range.lowerBound))
        let end = index(start, offsetBy: min(self.count - range.lowerBound, 
                                             range.upperBound - range.lowerBound))
        return String(self[start..<end])
    }

    subscript(_ range: CountablePartialRangeFrom<Int>) -> String {
        let start = index(startIndex, offsetBy: max(0, range.lowerBound))
         return String(self[start...])
    }
}

Usage:

let s = "hello"
s[0..<3] // "hel"
s[3...]  // "lo"

Or unicode:

let s = "😎🤣😋"
s[0..<1] // "😎"

You may not need this extension. See this swift forum comment for an overview of built-in string operations.

13
  • 5
    So much better, thank you for posting this extension! I think coming from Python, Swift is much harder than necessary to get used to. It seems for people going in the other direction from Objective C to Swift there is more positive confirmation. Commented Mar 31, 2018 at 20:28
  • 3
    Are there any gotchas to watch out with this particular extension? Why didn't Apple do something like this?
    – Andz
    Commented Feb 7, 2019 at 16:34
  • 2
    @Andz it is very inefficient. It starts from the beginning of the string - twice - and has to parse every character from there to "range" - twice.
    – kareman
    Commented Mar 11, 2019 at 11:50
  • 4
    You'll also need to add an extension that takes a CountableClosedRange<Int> if you'd like to write e.g. s[0...2]. Commented Apr 26, 2019 at 2:05
  • 2
    @ChrisFrederick and CountablePartialRangeFrom<Int> for s[2...].
    – Míng
    Commented Oct 25, 2019 at 2:11
39

Swift 4 & 5:

extension String {
  subscript(_ i: Int) -> String {
    let idx1 = index(startIndex, offsetBy: i)
    let idx2 = index(idx1, offsetBy: 1)
    return String(self[idx1..<idx2])
  }

  subscript (r: Range<Int>) -> String {
    let start = index(startIndex, offsetBy: r.lowerBound)
    let end = index(startIndex, offsetBy: r.upperBound)
    return String(self[start ..< end])
  }

  subscript (r: CountableClosedRange<Int>) -> String {
    let startIndex =  self.index(self.startIndex, offsetBy: r.lowerBound)
    let endIndex = self.index(startIndex, offsetBy: r.upperBound - r.lowerBound)
    return String(self[startIndex...endIndex])
  }
}

How to use it:

"abcde"[0] --> "a"

"abcde"[0...2] --> "abc"

"abcde"[2..<4] --> "cd"

24

Swift 4

In swift 4 String conforms to Collection. Instead of substring, we should now use a subscript. So if you want to cut out only the word "play" from "Hello, playground", you could do it like this:

var str = "Hello, playground"
let start = str.index(str.startIndex, offsetBy: 7)
let end = str.index(str.endIndex, offsetBy: -6)
let result = str[start..<end] // The result is of type Substring

It is interesting to know, that doing so will give you a Substring instead of a String. This is fast and efficient as Substring shares its storage with the original String. However sharing memory this way can also easily lead to memory leaks.

This is why you should copy the result into a new String, once you want to clean up the original String. You can do this using the normal constructor:

let newString = String(result)

You can find more information on the new Substring class in the [Apple documentation].1

So, if you for example get a Range as the result of an NSRegularExpression, you could use the following extension:

extension String {

    subscript(_ range: NSRange) -> String {
        let start = self.index(self.startIndex, offsetBy: range.lowerBound)
        let end = self.index(self.startIndex, offsetBy: range.upperBound)
        let subString = self[start..<end]
        return String(subString)
    }

}
2
  • Your code will crash if range.upperBound is > length of string. Also, a sample usage would have been helpful as well, as I wasn't familiar with subscripts in Swift. You could include something like datePartOnly = "2018-01-04-08:00"[NSMakeRange(0, 10)]. Other than that, very nice answer, +1 :).
    – dcp
    Commented Nov 29, 2017 at 21:43
  • nowadays it is this weird thing: text[Range( nsRange , in: text)!]
    – Fattie
    Commented Jan 28, 2020 at 19:19
17

Came across this fairly short and simple way of achieving this.

var str = "Hello, World"
let arrStr = Array(str)
print(arrStr[0..<5]) //["H", "e", "l", "l", "o"]
print(arrStr[7..<12]) //["W", "o", "r", "l", "d"]
print(String(arrStr[0..<5])) //Hello
print(String(arrStr[7..<12])) //World
1
  • 2
    Thx, geeeeeeez, could Apple made substrings any more complicated?! This probably isn't the most performant solution but in my case the code will be hardly ever called so it's a good compromise for readablility.
    – soger
    Commented Sep 8, 2022 at 10:50
11

Here's a function that returns substring of a given substring when start and end indices are provided. For complete reference you can visit the links given below.

func substring(string: String, fromIndex: Int, toIndex: Int) -> String? {
    if fromIndex < toIndex && toIndex < string.count /*use string.characters.count for swift3*/{
        let startIndex = string.index(string.startIndex, offsetBy: fromIndex)
        let endIndex = string.index(string.startIndex, offsetBy: toIndex)
        return String(string[startIndex..<endIndex])
    }else{
        return nil
    }
}

Here's a link to the blog post that I have created to deal with string manipulation in swift. String manipulation in swift (Covers swift 4 as well)

Or you can see this gist on github

0
9

I had the same initial reaction. I too was frustrated at how syntax and objects change so drastically in every major release.

However, I realized from experience how I always eventually suffer the consequences of trying to fight "change" like dealing with multi-byte characters which is inevitable if you're looking at a global audience.

So I decided to recognize and respect the efforts exerted by Apple engineers and do my part by understanding their mindset when they came up with this "horrific" approach.

Instead of creating extensions which is just a workaround to make your life easier (I'm not saying they're wrong or expensive), why not figure out how Strings are now designed to work.

For instance, I had this code which was working on Swift 2.2:

let rString = cString.substringToIndex(2)
let gString = (cString.substringFromIndex(2) as NSString).substringToIndex(2)
let bString = (cString.substringFromIndex(4) as NSString).substringToIndex(2)

and after giving up trying to get the same approach working e.g. using Substrings, I finally understood the concept of treating Strings as a bidirectional collection for which I ended up with this version of the same code:

let rString = String(cString.characters.prefix(2))
cString = String(cString.characters.dropFirst(2))
let gString = String(cString.characters.prefix(2))
cString = String(cString.characters.dropFirst(2))
let bString = String(cString.characters.prefix(2))

I hope this contributes...

1
  • 1
    Well, dealing with a complex problem does not mean that the solution could be elegant. Again, I also understand the problem, but the entire String class and dealing with it is just horrible.
    – inexcitus
    Commented Apr 9, 2019 at 17:14
9

Swift 5

// imagine, need make substring from 2, length 3

let s = "abcdef"    
let subs = s.suffix(s.count-2).prefix(3) 

// now subs = "cde"

0
8

I'm quite mechanical thinking. Here are the basics...

Swift 4 Swift 5

  let t = "abracadabra"

  let start1 = t.index(t.startIndex, offsetBy:0)
  let   end1 = t.index(t.endIndex, offsetBy:-5)
  let start2 = t.index(t.endIndex, offsetBy:-5)
  let   end2 = t.index(t.endIndex, offsetBy:0)

  let t2 = t[start1 ..< end1]
  let t3 = t[start2 ..< end2]                

  //or a shorter form 

  let t4 = t[..<end1]
  let t5 = t[start2...]

  print("\(t2) \(t3) \(t)")
  print("\(t4) \(t5) \(t)")

  // result:
  // abraca dabra abracadabra

The result is a substring, meaning that it is a part of the original string. To get a full blown separate string just use e.g.

    String(t3)
    String(t4)

This is what I use:

    let mid = t.index(t.endIndex, offsetBy:-5)
    let firstHalf = t[..<mid]
    let secondHalf = t[mid...]
6

I am new in Swift 3, but looking the String (index) syntax for analogy I think that index is like a "pointer" constrained to string and Int can help as an independent object. Using the base + offset syntax , then we can get the i-th character from string with the code bellow:

let s = "abcdefghi"
let i = 2
print (s[s.index(s.startIndex, offsetBy:i)])
// print c

For a range of characters ( indexes) from string using String (range) syntax we can get from i-th to f-th characters with the code bellow:

let f = 6
print (s[s.index(s.startIndex, offsetBy:i )..<s.index(s.startIndex, offsetBy:f+1 )])
//print cdefg

For a substring (range) from a string using String.substring (range) we can get the substring using the code bellow:

print (s.substring (with:s.index(s.startIndex, offsetBy:i )..<s.index(s.startIndex, offsetBy:f+1 ) ) )
//print cdefg

Notes:

  1. The i-th and f-th begin with 0.

  2. To f-th, I use offsetBY: f + 1, because the range of subscription use ..< (half-open operator), not include the f-th position.

  3. Of course must include validate errors like invalid index.

6

I created an simple function like this:

func sliceString(str: String, start: Int, end: Int) -> String {
    let data = Array(str)
    return String(data[start..<end])
}

you can use it in following way

print(sliceString(str: "0123456789", start: 0, end: 3)) // -> prints 012
1
  • Now as an extension... Commented Oct 31, 2023 at 1:47
5

Swift 4+

extension String {
    func take(_ n: Int) -> String {
        guard n >= 0 else {
            fatalError("n should never negative")
        }
        let index = self.index(self.startIndex, offsetBy: min(n, self.count))
        return String(self[..<index])
    }
}

Returns a subsequence of the first n characters, or the entire string if the string is shorter. (inspired by: https://kotlinlang.org/api/latest/jvm/stdlib/kotlin.text/take.html)

Example:

let text = "Hello, World!"
let substring = text.take(5) //Hello
3

Swift 4

extension String {
    subscript(_ i: Int) -> String {
        let idx1 = index(startIndex, offsetBy: i)
        let idx2 = index(idx1, offsetBy: 1)
        return String(self[idx1..<idx2])
    }
}

let s = "hello"

s[0]    // h
s[1]    // e
s[2]    // l
s[3]    // l
s[4]    // o
2
  • Now try this in a string of a million characters.
    – gnasher729
    Commented Dec 7, 2020 at 19:20
  • why? what happens? Commented Dec 8, 2020 at 1:54
3

Who ever was responsible for strings in Swift made a total mess of it, and it is definitely one of the worst features of the language.

A simple work-around is the implement a function like this (or make it an extension function):

func substring(str: String, start: Int, end : Int) -> String
{
    let startIndex = str.index(str.startIndex, offsetBy: start)
    let endIndex = str.index(str.startIndex, offsetBy: end)
    return String(str[startIndex..<endIndex])
}
1
2

I created a simple extension for this (Swift 3)

extension String {
    func substring(location: Int, length: Int) -> String? {
        guard characters.count >= location + length else { return nil }
        let start = index(startIndex, offsetBy: location)
        let end = index(startIndex, offsetBy: location + length)
        return substring(with: start..<end)
    }
}
2

Heres a more generic implementation:

This technique still uses index to keep with Swift's standards, and imply a full Character.

extension String
{
    func subString <R> (_ range: R) -> String? where R : RangeExpression, String.Index == R.Bound
    {
        return String(self[range])
    }

    func index(at: Int) -> Index
    {
        return self.index(self.startIndex, offsetBy: at)
    }
}

To sub string from the 3rd character:

let item = "Fred looks funny"
item.subString(item.index(at: 2)...) // "ed looks funny"

I've used camel subString to indicate it returns a String and not a Substring.

2

Building on the above I needed to split a string at a non-printing character dropping the non-printing character. I developed two methods:

var str = "abc\u{1A}12345sdf"
let range1: Range<String.Index> = str.range(of: "\u{1A}")!
let index1: Int = str.distance(from: str.startIndex, to: range1.lowerBound)
let start = str.index(str.startIndex, offsetBy: index1)
let end = str.index(str.endIndex, offsetBy: -0)
let result = str[start..<end] // The result is of type Substring
let firstStr = str[str.startIndex..<range1.lowerBound]

which I put together using some of the answers above.

Because a String is a collection I then did the following:

var fString = String()
for (n,c) in str.enumerated(){

*if c == "\u{1A}" {
    print(fString);
    let lString = str.dropFirst(n + 1)
    print(lString)
    break
   }
 fString += String(c)
}*

Which for me was more intuitive. Which one is best? I have no way of telling They both work with Swift 5

2
  • Thanks for your answer. Is anything different about Strings in Swift 5? I haven't had time to play around with it yet.
    – Suragch
    Commented Mar 27, 2019 at 19:54
  • They say so but I have not had a chance to look into it. Commented Mar 28, 2019 at 5:27
2
var str = "VEGANISM"
print (str[str.index(str.startIndex, offsetBy:2)..<str.index(str.endIndex, offsetBy: -1)] )

//Output-> GANIS

Here, str.startIndex and str.endIndex is the starting index and ending index of your string.

Here as the offsetBy in startIndex = 2 -> str.index(str.startIndex, offsetBy:2) therefore the trimmed string will have starting from index 2 (i.e. from second character) and offsetBy in endIndex = -1 -> str.index(str.endIndex, offsetBy: -1) i.e. 1 character is being trimmed from the end.

var str = "VEGANISM"
print (str[str.index(str.startIndex, offsetBy:0)..<str.index(str.endIndex, offsetBy: 0)] )

//Output-> VEGANISM

As the offsetBy value = 0 on both sides i.e., str.index(str.startIndex, offsetBy:0) and str.index(str.endIndex, offsetBy: 0) therefore, the complete string is being printed

2

Tons of answers already, but here's a Swift 5 extension that works like substring in most other languages. length is optional, indexes are capped, and invalid selections result in an empty string (not an error or nil):

extension String {
    func substring(_ location: Int, _ length: Int? = nil) -> String {
      let start = min(max(0, location), self.count)
      let limitedLength = min(self.count - start, length ?? Int.max)
      let from = index(startIndex, offsetBy: start)
      let to = index(startIndex, offsetBy: start + limitedLength)
      return String(self[from..<to])
    }
}
1

Swift 4

"Substring" (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/swift/substring):

let greeting = "Hi there! It's nice to meet you! 👋"
let endOfSentence = greeting.index(of: "!")!
let firstSentence = greeting[...endOfSentence]
// firstSentence == "Hi there!"

Example of extension String:

private typealias HowDoYouLikeThatElonMusk = String
private extension HowDoYouLikeThatElonMusk {

    subscript(_ from: Character?, _ to: Character?, _ include: Bool) -> String? {
        if let _from: Character = from, let _to: Character = to {
            let dynamicSourceForEnd: String = (_from == _to ? String(self.reversed()) : self)
            guard let startOfSentence: String.Index = self.index(of: _from),
                let endOfSentence: String.Index = dynamicSourceForEnd.index(of: _to) else {
                return nil
            }

            let result: String = String(self[startOfSentence...endOfSentence])
            if include == false {
                guard result.count > 2 else {
                        return nil
                }
                return String(result[result.index(result.startIndex, offsetBy: 1)..<result.index(result.endIndex, offsetBy: -1)])
            }
            return result
        } else if let _from: Character = from {
            guard let startOfSentence: String.Index = self.index(of: _from) else {
                return nil
            }
            let result: String = String(self[startOfSentence...])
            if include == false {
                guard result.count > 1 else {
                    return nil
                }
                return String(result[result.index(result.startIndex, offsetBy: 1)...])
            }
            return result
        } else if let _to: Character = to {
            guard let endOfSentence: String.Index = self.index(of: _to) else {
                    return nil
            }
            let result: String = String(self[...endOfSentence])
            if include == false {
                guard result.count > 1 else {
                    return nil
                }
                return String(result[..<result.index(result.endIndex, offsetBy: -1)])
            }
            return result
        }
        return nil
    }
}

example of using the extension String:

let source =                                   ">>>01234..56789<<<"
// include = true
var from =          source["3", nil, true]  //       "34..56789<<<"
var to =            source[nil, "6", true]  // ">>>01234..56"
var fromTo =        source["3", "6", true]  //       "34..56"
let notFound =      source["a", nil, true]  // nil
// include = false
from =              source["3", nil, false] //        "4..56789<<<"
to =                source[nil, "6", false] // ">>>01234..5"
fromTo =            source["3", "6", false] //        "4..5"
let outOfBounds =   source[".", ".", false] // nil

let str = "Hello, playground"
let hello = str[nil, ",", false] // "Hello"
1

The specificity of String has mostly been addressed in other answers. To paraphrase: String has a specific Index which is not of type Int because string elements do not have the same size in the general case. Hence, String does not conform to RandomAccessCollection and accessing a specific index implies the traversal of the collection, which is not an O(1) operation.

Many answers have proposed workarounds for using ranges, but they can lead to inefficient code as they use String methods (index(from:), index(:offsetBy:), ...) that are not O(1).

To access string elements like in an array you should use an Array:

let array = Array("Hello, world!")
let letter = array[5]

This is a trade-off, the array creation is an O(n) operation but array accesses are then O(1). You can convert back to a String when you want with String(array).

2
  • This seems like it would be a good option if you are manipulating your own text. However, if it's coming from users, you run into problems with surrogate pairs and grapheme clusters.
    – Suragch
    Commented Feb 10, 2021 at 1:16
  • Sure, this should be used with caution and the user must know what he is doing.
    – Louis Lac
    Commented Feb 10, 2021 at 9:45
0

Swift 5 Solution High Performance

let fromIndex = s.index(s.startIndex, offsetBy: fromIndex)
let toIndex = s.index(s.startIndex, offsetBy: toIndex)

I used this approach to get the substring from a fromIndex to toIndex for a Leetcode problem and it timed-out it seems like this is quite in-efficient and slow and was causing the timeout.

A faster pure Swift way to get this is done is:

let fromIndex = String.Index(utf16Offset:fromIndex, in: s)
let toIndex = String.Index(utf16Offset: toIndex, in: s)
3
  • 1
    This gives unexpected results if there are any characters in the string that are made up of multiple unicode codepoints (emojis for example). The UTF16 index does not map to the character index in this case. This may be faster for situations where you know there will be no emoji input, but I would STRONGLY avoid using this in any production code.
    – Egg
    Commented Sep 25, 2023 at 14:53
  • Yes as I mentioned in the answer this was done only for a Leetcode problem, in real work applications the first approach will work just fine. Commented Sep 25, 2023 at 15:33
  • This should be deleted, it's nonsense
    – Fattie
    Commented Dec 9, 2024 at 2:13
-1

Swift 5
let desiredIndex: Int = 7 let substring = str[String.Index(encodedOffset: desiredIndex)...]
This substring variable will give you the result.
Simply here Int is converted to Index and then you can split the strings. Unless you will get errors.

1
  • 4
    This is wrong. A Character might consist of one or more bytes. It only works with ascii text.
    – Leo Dabus
    Commented Mar 13, 2020 at 18:28
-1
  extension String {
    func subString (form start : Int, to end: Int) -> String {
      guard start >= 0, end <= self.count, start <= end else {
         return "Not valid index";
      }
      let startIndex = self.index(self.startIndex, offsetBy: start);
      let endIndex = self.index(self.startIndex, offsetBy: end);
      return String(self[startIndex..<endIndex]);
    }
  }


let myString = "Hello, World!"
if let substring = myString.substring(from: 7, to: 12) {
    print(substring)  // Output: "World"
} else {
    print("Invalid range")
}

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.