-1

Correct me if I am wrong, but as far as I know, Azure Logic Apps Consumption workflows are stateful workflows. If I am wrong, please inform me about this by sharing the link to the documentation that states otherwise.

So, I decided to compare execution time of Azure Logic Apps Consumption (stateful) workflow vs Standard (also stateful) workflow.

My example flow gets all blobs from a specific container, calculates a specific property, let's say, totalAmount, and sends an email message with this totalAmount. Then it moves all the processed blobs to the archive container.

Below are my execution time testing results in seconds depending on the amount of blobs to be processed in the Blob storage:

Consumption / Standard

1.93 / 7.04 (1 blob)

7.91 / 10.19 (10 blob)

10.71 / 21.52 (50 blobs)

15.32 / 34.5 (100 blobs)

My expectations were that Consumption one would be slower, but it turned out that Standard one was slower. Can someone explain to me possible reasons I have observed such testing results? Thanks in advance!

1
  • What SKU are you on for standard? If you're on WS1, you're on the lowest SKU and may need to scale up.
    – Skin
    Commented 20 hours ago

0

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.