Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1603.04443
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Astrophysics of Galaxies

arXiv:1603.04443 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 14 Mar 2016 (v1), last revised 21 Apr 2017 (this version, v2)]

Title:Knowing the unknowns: uncertainties in simple estimators of galactic dynamical masses

Authors:David J. R. Campbell (ICC Durham), Carlos S. Frenk (ICC Durham), Adrian Jenkins (ICC Durham), Vincent R. Eke (ICC Durham), Julio F. Navarro (Victoria, CIfAR), Till Sawala (Helsinki), Matthieu Schaller (ICC Durham), Azadeh Fattahi (Victoria), Kyle A. Oman (Victoria), Tom Theuns (ICC Durham)
View a PDF of the paper titled Knowing the unknowns: uncertainties in simple estimators of galactic dynamical masses, by David J. R. Campbell (ICC Durham) and 9 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:The observed stellar kinematics of dispersion-supported galaxies are often used to measure dynamical masses. Recently, several analytical relationships between the stellar line-of-sight velocity dispersion, the projected (2D) or deprojected (3D) half-light radius, and the total mass enclosed within the half-light radius, relying on the spherical Jeans equation, have been proposed. Here, we make use of the APOSTLE cosmological hydrodynamical simulations of the Local Group to test the validity and accuracy of such mass estimators for both dispersion and rotation-supported galaxies, for field and satellite galaxies, and for galaxies of varying masses, shapes, and velocity dispersion anisotropies. We find that the mass estimators of Walker et al. and Wolf et al. are able to recover the masses of dispersion-dominated systems with little systematic bias, but with a 1-sigma scatter of 25 and 23 percent, respectively. The error on the estimated mass is dominated by the impact of the 3D shape of the stellar mass distribution, which is difficult to constrain observationally. This intrinsic scatter becomes the dominant source of uncertainty in the masses estimated for galaxies like the dwarf spheroidal (dSph) satellites of the Milky Way, where the observational errors in their sizes and velocity dispersions are small. Such scatter may also affect the inner density slopes of dSphs derived from multiple stellar populations, relaxing the significance with which Navarro-Frenk-White profiles may be excluded, depending on the degree to which the relevant properties of the different stellar populations are correlated. Finally, we derive a new optimal mass estimator that removes the residual biases and achieves a statistically significant reduction in the scatter to 20 percent overall for dispersion-dominated galaxies, allowing more precise and accurate mass estimates.
Comments: Accepted for publication in MNRAS. 26 pages, 21 figures, 3 tables
Subjects: Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA); Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Cite as: arXiv:1603.04443 [astro-ph.GA]
  (or arXiv:1603.04443v2 [astro-ph.GA] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1603.04443
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx975
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: David Campbell [view email]
[v1] Mon, 14 Mar 2016 20:00:04 UTC (3,858 KB)
[v2] Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:29:54 UTC (4,703 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Knowing the unknowns: uncertainties in simple estimators of galactic dynamical masses, by David J. R. Campbell (ICC Durham) and 9 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.GA
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2016-03
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.CO

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • Click here to contact arXiv Contact
  • Click here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status