Commons:Phạm vi dự án/Cập nhật 2013/Chính
 | This page is presently inactive and retained primarily for historical interest.
If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you may try using the talk page (though your voice may not be heard) or start a discussion at the Village pump. |
According to existing policy, the formal aim of Wikimedia Commons is to provide a media file repository:
- that makes available public domain and freely-licensed educational media content to all, and
- that acts as a common repository for the various projects of the Wikimedia Foundation.
The expression "educational" is to be understood according to its broad meaning of "providing knowledge; instructional or informative".
Discuss stage 2 of this review
Dịch thuật
Tổng quan
Liên kết tới quy định hiện tại
Thảo luận: Câu ngữ giới thiệu phạm vi
Nội dung: Tập tin
- Phải là một tập tin phương tiện
- Phải có định dạng tập tin tự do được cho phép
- Phải được cấp phép tự do hoặc thuộc phạm vi công cộng
Discussion: Pages, galleries and categories
Discussion: Areas of particular concern
Discussion: Identifiable people
Các đề xuất khác
A discussion is happening now at Commons talk:Project scope/Update 2013/Stage 2 on how part 2 of this review should be structured. Please comment there.
Rationale
Over the last few months there has been a lot of discussion within Commons as well as outside about what the scope of Wikimedia Commons should be. Discussions have largely but not entirely focused on issues concerning the small proportion of holdings that relate to sexual imagery and to privacy/the rights of the subject. Both have complex moral and legal dimensions, and neither has yet been fully resolved. More generally, some of our polices have been in place for some time, and are overdue for a review.
Quy trình kiểm tra
- Part 1 (completing now)
The intention initially is simply to gather a wide range of views from the wider Wikimedia community and to encourage constructive discussion. Plenty of time should be allowed for that - no specific deadline is envisaged.
- Part 2 (not yet started)
Beyond that, we will need to see how the community wants to take things forward. There may be one or two suggestions, perhaps, that rapidly gain wide support and which could be adopted quickly. More contentious issues may need collaborative work on a proposal that has gained support during this initial phase. Finally, we may need to run some formal polls.
See Commons talk:Project scope/Update 2013/Stage 2 for the current discussion on how best to structure part 2.
Nội dung tổng quan và đọc thêm
- The tragedy of Wikipedia's commons, a Signpost Op-ed by Gigs
- A response to The Tragedy of Wikipedia’s commons, two Signpost Op-eds by MichaelMaggs and Mattbuck in response
- A recent Request for comment regarding Commons' scope
- A 2009 proposal to tighten up on photographs of identifiable people. No clear consensus at the time.
- Issues involving living people in the WMF's BLP board resolution
- The WMF's 2011 board resolution regarding subject consent for images of identifiable living people
- The 2010 Wikimedia Study of Controversial Content. Click through to read sections 1, 2 and 3.
- 2010 Commons discussion of sexual content policy (not adopted) and the non-policy help file Help:Sexual content.
- A proposal of April 2013 regarding the content of User pages on Commons
- Commons:Deletion_requests/NASA_images_of_User:Huntster Example of "the reasonable doubt" term interpretation resulting in an extremely narrow project scope.