Inco Superstack
| Inco Superstack | |
|---|---|
The Vale-Inco Superstack at the Inco Copper Cliff smelter | |
![]() Interactive map of the Inco Superstack area | |
| Alternative names | Vale Superstack |
| Record height | |
| Tallest in the world from 1971 to 1987[I] | |
| Preceded by | Mitchell Power Plant |
| Surpassed by | Ekibastuz GRES-2 Power Station |
| General information | |
| Status | Decommissioned |
| Type | Chimney |
| Location | Greater Sudbury, Canada |
| Coordinates | 46°28′48.23″N 81°3′23.43″W / 46.4800639°N 81.0565083°W |
| Construction started | 1970 |
| Completed | 1972 |
| Cost | $25 million ($160 million inflation adjusted) |
| Owner | Vale Canada |
| Height | |
| Height | 381 m (1,250 ft) |
| Dimensions | |
| Diameter | at base: 35 m (115 ft) at top: 16 m (52 ft) |
| Technical details | |
| Material | Reinforced concrete with stainless steel liner |
| References | |
| [1] | |
The Inco Superstack in Sudbury, Ontario, with a height of 381 metres (1,250 ft), is the tallest chimney in Canada and in the Western Hemisphere and the second-tallest freestanding chimney in the world, after the Ekibastuz GRES-2 Power Station, in Kazakhstan.[2] It is also the second-tallest freestanding structure of any type in Canada, behind the CN Tower but ahead of First Canadian Place. As of 2023, it is the 51st-tallest freestanding structure in the world. The Superstack has a tapered shape as it gets wider near the base reaching a width of 35 meters.[3] It is located on top of the largest nickel smelting operation in the world at Vale's Copper Cliff processing facility in the city of Greater Sudbury.
In 2018, Vale announced that the stack would be decommissioned and dismantled, beginning in 2020.[4] Two new, smaller stacks were constructed under the company's Clean Atmospheric Emissions Reduction Project.[5] In July 2020, Vale announced that the Superstack had been officially taken out of service but would remain operational in standby mode for two more months as a backup in the event of a malfunction in the new system,[6] and that the dismantling of the Superstack would then begin.[7] Although some have called for the stack to be left in place as a tourist attraction,[8] in September 2024, Vale announced an updated plan, which will see the stack dismantled by 2029.[9] Dismantling of the Superstack commenced in September of 2025 and as of October 2025 the stack height was reduced by about 35 meters, giving it a current height of approximately ~345 meters.[10][11] The current height reduction resulted in the Superstack falling from second to eighth place for the tallest chimney in the world[10]. Demolition work is currently on pause as it cannot take place during the winter months.
In addition to further reducing sulphur dioxide emissions by 85 per cent, the decommissioning of the stack was expected to cut the complex's natural gas consumption in half.[6]
History
[edit]The Superstack was built by Inco Limited (and later purchased by Vale) at an estimated cost of 25 million dollars.[12] Construction was delayed by a 13-week labour dispute.[13] Construction on the structure was underway during the Sudbury tornado of August 20, 1970; the structure swayed heavily in the wind but remained standing and suffered only minor damage.[14][15][16] Six workers were on top of the construction platform when the storm hit, all of whom survived.[14][16] The same day was the final day of construction on the stack, with the construction fully completed by the evening of August 21, 1970.[17]
The stack entered full operation in 1972.[1] From the date of its completion until the Ekibastuz GRES-2 chimney was constructed in 1987 in Kazakhstan, it was the world's tallest smokestack.[18] Until the CN Tower's completion in 1975, it was the tallest freestanding structure in Canada for just under 3 years.[19][20]
Prior to the construction of the Superstack, the waste gases had contributed to severe local ecological damage. The Copper Cliff smelter was already home to some of the world's tallest stacks, including two 500 ft (150 m) chimneys constructed in 1928-29 and 1936.[21][22] However, they proved to be insufficient and were compounded by open coke beds in the early-to-mid-20th century and by logging for fuel, which inevitably caused a near-total loss of native vegetation and soil erosion.[23][24] Of particular interest to geologists are the now-exposed rocky outcrops, which have been permanently stained charcoal black by pollution and acid rain in a layer which penetrates into the once pink-grey granite.[25]
The Superstack was built to disperse sulphur gases and other byproducts of the smelting process away from the city of Sudbury. It did so by placing the gases high in the air, where they normally blew right past the city on the prevailing winds.[26] As a result, the gases could be detected in the atmosphere around Greater Sudbury in a 240 kilometres (150 mi) radius of the Inco plant.[27] The addition of the Superstack and dispersal of sulphur dioxide helped reduce acidity of lakes, however many lakes in the surrounding areas are still highly acidic.[28] Research has shown that the long term decrease in toxic emission will result in rehabiliation for water bodies such as the lakes near Copper Cliff.[29] During the 1970s and 80s, the sulphur dioxide plume formed a permanent, opaque, cloud-like formation running across the entire horizon as seen from a distance. Periodic inversions would cause the plume to fall into the city. [28]
Construction of the Superstack was followed by an environmental reclamation project, which included rehabilitation of existing landscapes and selected water bodies such as Lake Ramsey. An ambitious regreening plan saw over three million new trees planted within the Greater Sudbury area. The application of limestone to soil and lakes was also done to increase pH levels.[30] In 1992, Inco and the city were given an award by the United Nations in honour of their environmental rehabilitation programmes.[31][32]
On November 3, 2014, Vale announced that it may decide to stop using the stack after a $1 billion project to reduce emissions by 85% negated the need for the stack. If no other use for it was found, Vale was to decommission the Superstack, demolish it, and replace it with a much smaller chimney.[33] In 2017, Vale announced plans to decommission the Superstack upon the construction of two smaller, more energy efficient stacks.[34][35] On July 28, 2020, Vale updated that news and stated that the Superstack at its Copper Cliff Complex had been taken out of service. It would remain on "hot standby" for about two months while the replacement flue connections were tested, but it would then be demolished over the years.[36]
Emissions
[edit]While the Superstack lowered the ground-level pollution in the city, it dispersed sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide gases over a much larger area. Releasing to nearly one fourth of the total sulphur dioxide produced in Canada, making it a large contributor of pollution.[37] Though not the single source of lake acidification, the heavily industrialized Ohio Valley has contributed to the ecological problem of lakes as far north as northern Ontario. Research from data gleaned up to the late 1980s demonstrated acid rain to have affected the biology of some 7,000 lakes.[38]
Prior to Vale's purchase of Inco, a major construction effort by Inco in the early 1990s dramatically scrubbed waste gases before pumping them up the Superstack. The upgrades were completed in 1994 and emissions have since been significantly reduced.[39] By comparison to the plume prior to installation, the plume now disperses quite rapidly and is often see-through, even at the stack site.
Emissions reductions and increases in thermal efficiency have reached the point that natural draught is no longer sufficient to draw flue gas up the stack and necessitate the use of induced draught fans and/or reheating of the flue gas using natural gas burners.[40]
As well as SO2 emissions, Inco's Superstack has had very high arsenic, nickel, and lead emissions to the atmosphere. In 1998, Inco emitted 146.7 tonnes of lead from Copper Cliff while producing 238,500 tonnes of nickel-copper matte. That is 150 times more lead emission than would be permitted by a US EPA-regulated lead smelter producing 238,500 tonnes of lead.[41] As a result of the excessive lead emissions from the Inco Superstack, soil tests of the surrounding community of Copper Cliff was found to have levels of lead that are sufficient to cause harm to young children.[42]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b "Vale's Iconic Superstack: History and Key Facts" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 18, 2021. Retrieved September 20, 2020.
- ^ Turner, R. J. W.; Quat, M. B.; Boiridy, M.; Debicki, R.; Thurston, P. (January 1, 2015). "Copper Cliff smelter superstack, Greater Sudbury: metals from minerals, managing environmental impacts, and historic mining". Government of Ontario, Natural Resources Canada – via GeoTours Northern Ontario.
- ^ Aelick, Lyndsay (June 23, 2025). "Once the tallest structure in the world, Sudbury landmark to be dismantled piece by piece". CTVNews. Retrieved March 26, 2026.
- ^ "Superstack dismantling will begin in 2020, Vale says". CBC Northern Ontario, September 19, 2018.
- ^ Molly Frommer, "Two new smaller stacks are ready, decommissioning of Sudbury's Superstack about to begin". CTV Northern Ontario, September 10, 2020.
- ^ a b "Sudbury's iconic Superstack operational no more". Northern Ontario Business, July 28, 2020.
- ^ Lindsay Kelly, "Slow process of demolition to start on Vale's Superstack". Northern Ontario Business, July 29, 2020.
- ^ Judith Van Boxel, "Column: Why tear down the Superstack? Turn it into a tourist attraction". Sudbury Star, May 17, 2023.
- ^ "Sudbury's Superstack slated for demolition by 2029". Northern Ontario Business, September 4, 2024.
- ^ a b Migneault, Jonathan (October 31, 2025). "Work to dismantle Sudbury's Superstack ahead of schedule". CBC News. Retrieved March 27, 2026.
- ^ https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/video/9.6960166
- ^ Scales, Marilyn (January 25, 2017). "ENVIRONMENT: Vale to decommission Superstack in Sudbury". Canadian Mining Journal. Retrieved March 30, 2026.
- ^ Ryma, Tony (June 25, 2025). "Book details strike at the former INCO in 1958". CTVNews. Retrieved March 31, 2026.
- ^ a b Migneault, Jonathan (March 14, 2023). "Reflections on the Inco Superstack". CBC News. Retrieved March 26, 2026.
- ^ "A look back in time: Sudbury's deadly Aug. 20, 1970, tornado". The Sudbury Star. August 21, 2020. Retrieved March 30, 2026.
- ^ a b "90 mile winds smash Sudbury area". Toronto Star, August 20, 1970. p. 1.
- ^ "Smokestack resisted gale to become world's tallest". Toronto Star, August 22, 1970. p. D3.
- ^ "GRES-2 Chimney (Ekibastuz, 1987)". structurae.net. Structurae. Retrieved December 28, 2020.
- ^ McFarlan, Donald (1990). 1990 Guinness book of world records. Internet Archive. New York : Bantam. p. 239. ISBN 978-0-553-28452-2.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link) - ^ "History | CN Tower". www.cntower.ca. May 18, 2021. Retrieved March 31, 2026.
- ^ "The Inco Triangle Digital Archive - Greater Sudbury Museums, September 1936 pg. 6". museums.greatersudbury.ca. September 29, 2025. Retrieved March 29, 2026.
- ^ INCO Triangle, December 1962, pp. 6–7, 14.
- ^ Freedman, B.; Hutchinson, T. C. (October 1, 1980). "Long-term effects of smelter pollution at Sudbury, Ontario, on forest community composition". Canadian Journal of Botany. 58 (19): 2123–2140. doi:10.1139/b80-245. ISSN 0008-4026.
- ^ Boerchers, Morrissa; Fitzpatrick, Patricia; Storie, Christopher; Hostetler, Glen (July 1, 2016). "Reinvention through regreening: Examining environmental change in Sudbury, Ontario". The Extractive Industries and Society. 3 (3): 793–801. Bibcode:2016ExIS....3..793B. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2016.03.005. ISSN 2214-790X.
- ^ Leverington, David; Schindler, Michael (April 2, 2016). "Detection and Mapping of Black Rock Coatings Using Hyperion Images: Sudbury, Ontario, Canada". Remote Sensing. 8 (4): 301. Bibcode:2016RemS....8..301L. doi:10.3390/rs8040301. ISSN 2072-4292.
- ^ Gunn, John M. (1995). Restoration and Recovery of an Industrial Region - Progress in Restoring the Smelter-Damaged Landscape Near Sudbury, Canada. New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 0-387-94430-3.
- ^ Millan, Millan M.; Chung, Yong S. (January 1977). "Detection of a plume 400 km from the source". Atmospheric Environment (1967). 11 (10): 939–944. doi:10.1016/0004-6981(77)90023-3.
- ^ a b Chan, Walter H.; Lusis, Maris A. (September 1, 1985). "Post-superstack sudbury smelter emissions and their fate in the atmosphere: An overview of the sudbury environment study results". Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. 26 (1): 43–58. doi:10.1007/BF00299487. ISSN 1573-2932.
- ^ Keller, W.; Pitblado, J. Roger; Conroy, N. I. (December 1, 1986). "Water quality improvements in the Sudbury, Ontario, Canada area related to reduced smelter emissions". Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. 31 (3): 765–774. doi:10.1007/BF00284223. ISSN 1573-2932.
- ^ Yan, Norman D.; Keller, W.; Gunn, John M. (1995), Gunn, John M. (ed.), "Liming of Sudbury Lakes: Lessons for Recovery of Aquatic Biota from Acidification", Restoration and Recovery of an Industrial Region: Progress in Restoring the Smelter-Damaged Landscape Near Sudbury, Canada, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 195–204, doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2520-1_15, ISBN 978-1-4612-2520-1, retrieved March 31, 2026
{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link) - ^ "Restoration and Recovery of an Industrial Region". www.greatersudbury.ca. Archived from the original on November 28, 2025. Retrieved March 30, 2026.
- ^ Gunn, John M. (December 21, 1996). "Restoring the Smelter-Damaged Landscape Near Sudbury, Canada". Ecological Restoration. 14 (2): 129–136. Bibcode:1996EcoRe..14..129G. doi:10.3368/er.14.2.129. ISSN 1543-4060.
- ^ Jonathan Migneault (November 3, 2014). "Vale examines Superstack's future". Northern Life. Retrieved November 4, 2014.
- ^ "Superstack to be decommissioned, but no immediate plans for demolition". cbc.ca. January 24, 2017. Retrieved January 25, 2017.
- ^ "Continuous Improvement: The Superstack to be taken out of service" (Press release).
- ^ "Sudbury's iconic Superstack no longer operational". TimminsToday. July 30, 2020. Retrieved July 31, 2020.
- ^ Nriagu, Jerome O.; Coker, Robert D. (August 1978). "Isotopic composition of sulphur in atmospheric precipitation around Sudbury, Ontario". Nature. 274 (5674): 883–885. doi:10.1038/274883a0. ISSN 0028-0836.
- ^ "Science and the Environment Bulletin: The Way Back: Sudbury Lakes Recovering from Acid Rain". epe.lac-bac.gc.ca. Retrieved March 31, 2026.
- ^ "Process Overview". Archived from the original on July 1, 2007. Retrieved March 14, 2007.
- ^ Northern Ontario Business
- ^ "Pollution Probe - Sulphur Dioxide and Toxic Metal Emissions from Smelters in Ontario" (PDF). p. 14. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 9, 2014. Retrieved August 23, 2012.
- ^ Risk Management - Follow Up to the Sudbury Soils Study Human Health Risk Assessment
External links
[edit]- "Emporis building ID 212441". Emporis. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015.
- "Inco Superstack". SkyscraperPage.
- Inco Air Quality Site
- CVRD Inco plugs sulphur dioxide holes
- 'A View Rarely Seen' - Aerial video footage of the Sudbury (INCO) Superstack
- 'A View Rarely Seen Part II' - Aerial video footage of the Sudbury (INCO) Superstack
