Talk:Economic system

This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Systems Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is not associated with a particular field. Fields are listed on the template page. Sociology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Economics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The mutualism link featured in most sidebars here goes to the article about Mutualism as an insurance movement, not Mutualism as a form of economic theory. Bismvth (talk) 04:26, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why is Einstein brought up here at all? He's not the most relevant or commonly referenced proponent and the paragraph and quote is disconnected from the rest of the article. In the context of the very short and neutral captialism and mixed market descriptions this article is very skewed. And referencing the position of a famous figures positive argument for an ideology doesnt give equal representation. I don't think I'd mind this if there were a "laymans argument" for each ideology category. That'd be interesting but I don't think that kind of sourcing is very typical of Wikipedia. 83.233.197.54 (talk) 07:56, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I agree with you; I removed the quote. This would be like asking J-Lo's opinion on the theory of relativity. JuxtaposedJacob (talk) | :) | he/him | 02:39, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Both nationalization and expropriation in the economic sidebar/category leads to the nationalization page, when the latter should go to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eminent_domain Jotungard (talk) 11:10, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Emerging conceptual models posit future economic systems driven by synthetic cognition, where artificial agents autonomously generate value, bypassing traditional human labour frameworks. Founder8 (talk) 14:27, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]