rebrand from Figma-linux to Select for Figma #384
Conversation
chore: Make README prettier
|
I made README.md look prettier. |
|
w |
|
@ChugunovRoman please take a look at this |
|
WTF is "Select for Figma"? Isn't the name "Figma Linux" already a different name? |
|
Although "Select for Figma" isn't a bad alternative either. |
Flathub guidelines disallows that. There is a reason why we choose "Select for Figma" instead of "Figma Linux" |
|
^^^ my girlfriend described the issue perfectly |
|
basically the tldr is that "figma linux" sounds like an official client |
|
tbh "select for figma" is a worse name and doesnt have much meaning (compared to the current one which is straightforward - what does "select" mean in this context?) but i guess you have no choice when it comes to copyright |
|
@ChugunovRoman your changes are fine |
|
@ChugunovRoman i misunderstood how gh works and i thought it auto used your suggestions but apparently that wasn't the case anyways i did what you suggested me to do |
|
@ChugunovRoman any updates? this will be affected for Flatpak users as they are no longer find your project on Flathub |
|
more than 5 months and no changes |
pretty much the maintainer simply doesn't have time to do so. |
|
I know this doesn't solve the problem of getting the app back on Flathub, but as a temporary solution I've made a repo that builds a flatpak with the suggested changes here: https://github.com/flat-software/software.flat.Select The resulting flatpak is published on the flat.software repository: https://flat.software/repo.flatpakrepo |
8 participants
due to some copyright issues, figma-linux should move away from using the figma trademark in its name, making it look like it's the official figma app, so here's my proposal to actually do that