Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade urllib3 from 2.0.7 to 2.6.0#2

Open
KB01111 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
snyk-fix-5cc7270f5ca79f1f2e7de9e12db0bf66
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade urllib3 from 2.0.7 to 2.6.0#2
KB01111 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
snyk-fix-5cc7270f5ca79f1f2e7de9e12db0bf66

Conversation

@KB01111

@KB01111 KB01111 commented Dec 13, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

User description

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • tools/requirements.txt
⚠️ Warning
equests 2.31.0 requires urllib3, which is not installed.

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling


CodeAnt-AI Description

Pin urllib3 to 2.6.0 in tooling requirements to fix security vulnerabilities

What Changed

  • Added urllib3>=2.6.0 to tools/requirements.txt so the project's tooling dependencies no longer install vulnerable urllib3 versions
  • Prevents two known urllib3 vulnerabilities from being pulled into development and CI environments

Impact

✅ Fewer security scan findings in CI
✅ Safer development and tooling environments
✅ Prevents known urllib3 CVEs from being introduced by tools

💡 Usage Guide

Checking Your Pull Request

Every time you make a pull request, our system automatically looks through it. We check for security issues, mistakes in how you're setting up your infrastructure, and common code problems. We do this to make sure your changes are solid and won't cause any trouble later.

Talking to CodeAnt AI

Got a question or need a hand with something in your pull request? You can easily get in touch with CodeAnt AI right here. Just type the following in a comment on your pull request, and replace "Your question here" with whatever you want to ask:

@codeant-ai ask: Your question here

This lets you have a chat with CodeAnt AI about your pull request, making it easier to understand and improve your code.

Example

@codeant-ai ask: Can you suggest a safer alternative to storing this secret?

Preserve Org Learnings with CodeAnt

You can record team preferences so CodeAnt AI applies them in future reviews. Reply directly to the specific CodeAnt AI suggestion (in the same thread) and replace "Your feedback here" with your input:

@codeant-ai: Your feedback here

This helps CodeAnt AI learn and adapt to your team's coding style and standards.

Example

@codeant-ai: Do not flag unused imports.

Retrigger review

Ask CodeAnt AI to review the PR again, by typing:

@codeant-ai: review

Check Your Repository Health

To analyze the health of your code repository, visit our dashboard at https://app.codeant.ai. This tool helps you identify potential issues and areas for improvement in your codebase, ensuring your repository maintains high standards of code health.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 13, 2025 04:26
@codemetrics-ai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Your Codemetrics free trial has expired. To continue using AI based pull request reviews, please subscribe to premium in team settings.

@codeant-ai

codeant-ai Bot commented Dec 13, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CodeAnt AI is reviewing your PR.


Thanks for using CodeAnt! 🎉

We're free for open-source projects. if you're enjoying it, help us grow by sharing.

Share on X ·
Reddit ·
LinkedIn

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Dec 13, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Ignore keyword(s) in the title.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch snyk-fix-5cc7270f5ca79f1f2e7de9e12db0bf66

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary of Changes

Hello @KB01111, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, focuses on enhancing the project's security posture by upgrading the urllib3 dependency. The update addresses two specific vulnerabilities by pinning urllib3 to version 2.6.0 in the tools/requirements.txt file, ensuring the project utilizes a more secure version of this critical library.

Highlights

  • Dependency Upgrade: The urllib3 package has been upgraded from version 2.0.7 to 2.6.0 to address two identified security vulnerabilities.
  • Automated Security Fix: This pull request was automatically generated by Snyk to apply the necessary security patch for the urllib3 dependency.
  • Requirements Update: The tools/requirements.txt file was updated to pin the urllib3 version, explicitly noting it's not a direct requirement but a security-driven pin.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@codeant-ai codeant-ai Bot added the size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files label Dec 13, 2025

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, aims to upgrade urllib3 to fix security vulnerabilities. However, the proposed change to version 2.6.0 is problematic. Firstly, this version of urllib3 does not appear to exist. Secondly, and more critically, pinning to a urllib3 v2.x version will likely cause a dependency conflict with the requests package, which is also a dependency in this file. Older versions of requests (pre-2.32.0) require urllib3<2.1. To resolve the security issue without breaking the dependencies, I've suggested pinning urllib3 to a secure version from the 1.x branch that maintains compatibility.

Comment thread tools/requirements.txt
requests
tqdm
xmltodict
urllib3>=2.6.0 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

The proposed change introduces a potential dependency conflict and uses a non-existent version of urllib3.

  1. Non-existent version: urllib3 version 2.6.0 does not seem to be a valid published version. The latest version in the v2 series is 2.2.1 as of this review.
  2. Dependency Conflict: The requests library, especially versions older than 2.32.0 (like 2.31.0 which is mentioned in the PR description), has a dependency on urllib3<2.1. Pinning urllib3 to a 2.x version will break the installation if an older version of requests is resolved.

To fix the security vulnerability while maintaining compatibility, I suggest pinning to the latest secure version of the 1.x series of urllib3, which is 1.26.18.

urllib3>=1.26.18,<2 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
@codeant-ai

codeant-ai Bot commented Dec 13, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CodeAnt AI finished reviewing your PR.

@codeant-ai

codeant-ai Bot commented Dec 13, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

💡 Enhance Your PR Reviews

We noticed that 3 feature(s) are not configured for this repository. Enabling these features can help improve your code quality and workflow:

🚦 Quality Gates

Status: Quality Gates are not enabled at the organization level
Learn more about Quality Gates

🎫 Jira Ticket Compliance

Status: Jira credentials file not found. Please configure Jira integration in your settings
Learn more about Jira Integration

⚙️ Custom Rules

Status: No custom rules configured. Add rules via organization settings or .codeant/review.json in your repository
Learn more about Custom Rules


Want to enable these features? Contact your organization admin or check our documentation for setup instructions.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR upgrades urllib3 from version 2.0.7 to 2.6.0 to address two security vulnerabilities (SNYK-PYTHON-URLLIB3-14192442 and SNYK-PYTHON-URLLIB3-14192443) identified by Snyk. urllib3 is a transitive dependency of the requests library, which is used extensively in the repository's auxiliary Python tools for documentation maintenance and API validation.

Key changes:

  • Adds urllib3>=2.6.0 as an explicit pinned dependency to tools/requirements.txt with a Snyk security comment

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread tools/requirements.txt
requests
tqdm
xmltodict
urllib3>=2.6.0 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The version constraint >=2.6.0 is inconsistent with the existing pattern in this file. All other dependencies in this file (argh, beautifulsoup4, emoji, requests, tqdm, xmltodict) are specified without version constraints. For consistency, consider either:

  1. Using just urllib3 without a version constraint (relying on pip to resolve compatible versions with requests)
  2. Adding version constraints to all dependencies in this file

The inconsistent approach may lead to confusion during future dependency management.

Suggested change
urllib3>=2.6.0 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
urllib3 # not directly required, previously pinned to avoid a vulnerability
Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files

3 participants