Skip to content

feat(destroy): Add multitenancy bypass options to destroy actions #2477

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
zachdaniel merged 4 commits into from
Dec 24, 2025
Merged

feat(destroy): Add multitenancy bypass options to destroy actions #2477

zachdaniel merged 4 commits into from
Dec 24, 2025
+266 −22

Conversation

@shahryarjb
Copy link
Contributor

@shahryarjb shahryarjb commented Dec 17, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Based on #2380

I try to create each pull request only after the previous one has been merged. The reason is that in my current project I have around 5k tests, and many issues surface there that are not detectable by tests within Ash itself. For this reason, I think I’ll move toward using the Update action after this PR

Contributor checklist

Leave anything that you believe does not apply unchecked.

  • I accept the AI Policy, or AI was not used in the creation of this PR.
  • Bug fixes include regression tests
  • Chores
  • Documentation changes
  • Features include unit/acceptance tests
  • Refactoring
  • Update dependencies
@shahryarjb shahryarjb marked this pull request as draft December 17, 2025 19:58
@shahryarjb shahryarjb marked this pull request as ready for review December 17, 2025 22:26
@zachdaniel zachdaniel merged commit e07462d into ash-project:main Dec 24, 2025
45 checks passed
@zachdaniel
Copy link
Contributor

zachdaniel commented Dec 24, 2025

🚀 Thank you for your contribution! 🚀
@shahryarjb shahryarjb deleted the ash-destroy-bypass branch January 6, 2026 17:39
@shahryarjb shahryarjb mentioned this pull request Jan 6, 2026
Merged
7 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

2 participants

@shahryarjb @zachdaniel