Skip to content

Bad results of dtu data without prior #301

Description

@Anonymous772066235

Hi,
when I try to train dtu data without prior, I found that the result of bakedangelo is bad, even worse than volsdf. I want to know whether this data (without prior) is not good enough, or there is something wrong with my training command.

My bakedangelo training command is ns-train bakedangelo --machine.num-gpus 1 --pipeline.model.level-init 8 --trainer.steps-per-eval-image 5000 --pipeline.datamanager.train-num-rays-per-batch 2048 --pipeline.datamanager.eval-num-rays-per-batch 512 --pipeline.model.sdf-field.use-appearance-embedding True --trainer.save-only-latest-checkpoint False --pipeline.model.background-color white --pipeline.model.sdf-field.bias 0.1 --pipeline.model.sdf-field.inside-outside True --pipeline.model.background-model grid --vis wandb --experiment-name scan55_bakedangelo sdfstudio-data --data data/dtu/scan55,
and the results is
image
Its depth and normal results are bad.

My volsdf training command is volsdf --machine.num-gpus 1 --pipeline.model.background-color white --pipeline.model.sdf-field.inside-outside True --trainer.load-dir outputs/scan55-volsdf/volsdf/2024-03-16_115658/sdfstudio_models --trainer.max-num-iterations 100001 --vis wandb --experiment-name scan55-volsdf sdfstudio-data --data data/dtu/scan55,
and the results is
image

BTW, the meta_data.json of this dtu data(scan55) is
image

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions