Skip to content

ci: add crates-release.yml workflow to publish to crates.io#1860

Merged
cgwalters merged 1 commit intobootc-dev:mainfrom
HuijingHei:crates-release
Dec 18, 2025
Merged

ci: add crates-release.yml workflow to publish to crates.io#1860
cgwalters merged 1 commit intobootc-dev:mainfrom
HuijingHei:crates-release

Conversation

@HuijingHei
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@HuijingHei HuijingHei commented Dec 17, 2025

Publish two crates:
bootc-internal-utils and bootc-internal-blockdev

Part of bootc-dev/infra#20

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Note

Gemini is unable to generate a review for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported.

@bootc-bot bootc-bot bot requested a review from ckyrouac December 17, 2025 01:54
@HuijingHei HuijingHei force-pushed the crates-release branch 2 times, most recently from ad72237 to 8f1ac0a Compare December 17, 2025 08:27
@HuijingHei HuijingHei force-pushed the crates-release branch 3 times, most recently from 47f8e3d to 946c002 Compare December 18, 2025 01:41
@henrywang
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Failure has been fixed by PR #1867. This PR needs a rebase. Thanks.

@HuijingHei
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Updated, thank you!

Publish two crates:
`bootc-internal-utils` and `bootc-internal-blockdev`

Part of	bootc-dev/infra#20

Signed-off-by: Huijing Hei <hhei@redhat.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@ckyrouac ckyrouac left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, thanks!

- uses: rust-lang/crates-io-auth-action@v1
id: auth
- run: |
for crate in bootc-internal-utils bootc-internal-blockdev; do
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we also need to add a step to our release workflow which bumps the versions of these crates right?

@cgwalters cgwalters merged commit 40dafdb into bootc-dev:main Dec 18, 2025
57 of 65 checks passed
@cgwalters
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Overall though I will say...we have huge amounts of mechanical overhead from keeping bootc and bootupd separate and I think coreos/bootupd#432 is still very relevant.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

4 participants