ci: declare least-privilege workflow-level contents: read#150
Open
arpitjain099 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
ci: declare least-privilege workflow-level contents: read#150arpitjain099 wants to merge 1 commit into
arpitjain099 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Declares an explicit workflow-level permissions: contents: read on 1 workflow that currently inherit the default broad read-write GITHUB_TOKEN. Each file was inspected and only reads the checkout; none publish, push, or write via the GitHub API. Post-CVE-2025-30066 hardening default. Signed-off-by: Arpit Jain <arpitjain099@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a workflow-level
permissions: contents: readto 1 workflow(s) that currently have nopermissions:block (and therefore get the default broad read-write token). Each affected workflow was inspected and only reads repository contents; no publish/release/push/comment paths, so the change is non-functional in steady state and just shrinks the blast radius.GitHub's documented Actions security recommendation. Happy to split per-file or adjust naming if preferred.